File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/anae.16078
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85163678022
- WOS: WOS:001018522300001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Aerosol generation with the use of positive pressure ventilation via supraglottic airway devices: an observational study
Title | Aerosol generation with the use of positive pressure ventilation via supraglottic airway devices: an observational study |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | aerosol anaesthesia COVID-19 respiratory infectious disease supraglottic airway device |
Issue Date | 28-Jun-2023 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Citation | Anaesthesia, 2023, v. 78, n. 9, p. 1112-1119 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The amount of aerosol generation associated with the use of positive pressure ventilation via a supraglottic airway device has not been quantified. We conducted a two-group, two-centre, prospective cohort study in which we recruited 21 low-risk adult patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia with second-generation supraglottic airway devices. An optical particle sizer and an isokinetic sampling probe were used to record particle concentrations per second at different size distributions (0.3–10 μm) during use as well as baseline levels during two common activities (conversation and coughing). There was a median (IQR [range]) peak increase of 2.8 (1.5–4.5 [1–28.1]) and 4.1 (2.0–7.1 [1–18.2]) times background concentrations during SAD insertion and removal. Most of the particles generated during supraglottic airway insertion (85.0%) and removal (85.3%) were < 3 μm diameter. Median (IQR [range]) aerosol concentration generated by insertion (1.1 (0.6–5.1 [0.2–22.3]) particles.cm−3) and removal (2.1 (0.5–3.0 [0.1–18.9]) particles.cm−3) of SADs were significantly lower than those produced during continuous talking (44.5 (28.3–70.5 [2.0–134.5]) particles.cm−3) and coughing (141.0 (98.3–202.8 [4.0–296.5]) particles.cm−3) (p < 0.001). The aerosol levels produced were similar with the two devices. The proportion of easily inhaled and small particles (<1 μm) produced during insertion (57.5%) and removal (57.5%) was much lower than during talking (99.1%) and coughing (99.6%). These results suggest that the use of supraglottic airway devices in low-risk patients, even with positive pressure ventilation, generates fewer aerosols than speaking and coughing in awake patients. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/337040 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 7.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.400 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Deng, W | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nestor, CC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Leung, KMM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chew, J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, H | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, S | - |
dc.contributor.author | Irwin, MG | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-11T10:17:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-11T10:17:36Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-06-28 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Anaesthesia, 2023, v. 78, n. 9, p. 1112-1119 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0003-2409 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/337040 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>The amount of aerosol generation associated with the use of positive pressure ventilation via a supraglottic airway device has not been quantified. We conducted a two-group, two-centre, prospective cohort study in which we recruited 21 low-risk adult patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia with second-generation supraglottic airway devices. An optical particle sizer and an isokinetic sampling probe were used to record particle concentrations per second at different size distributions (0.3–10 μm) during use as well as baseline levels during two common activities (conversation and coughing). There was a median (IQR [range]) peak increase of 2.8 (1.5–4.5 [1–28.1]) and 4.1 (2.0–7.1 [1–18.2]) times background concentrations during SAD insertion and removal. Most of the particles generated during supraglottic airway insertion (85.0%) and removal (85.3%) were < 3 μm diameter. Median (IQR [range]) aerosol concentration generated by insertion (1.1 (0.6–5.1 [0.2–22.3]) particles.cm<sup>−3</sup>) and removal (2.1 (0.5–3.0 [0.1–18.9]) particles.cm<sup>−3</sup>) of SADs were significantly lower than those produced during continuous talking (44.5 (28.3–70.5 [2.0–134.5]) particles.cm<sup>−3</sup>) and coughing (141.0 (98.3–202.8 [4.0–296.5]) particles.cm<sup>−3</sup>) (p < 0.001). The aerosol levels produced were similar with the two devices. The proportion of easily inhaled and small particles (<1 μm) produced during insertion (57.5%) and removal (57.5%) was much lower than during talking (99.1%) and coughing (99.6%). These results suggest that the use of supraglottic airway devices in low-risk patients, even with positive pressure ventilation, generates fewer aerosols than speaking and coughing in awake patients.</p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Wiley | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Anaesthesia | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | aerosol | - |
dc.subject | anaesthesia | - |
dc.subject | COVID-19 | - |
dc.subject | respiratory infectious disease | - |
dc.subject | supraglottic airway device | - |
dc.title | Aerosol generation with the use of positive pressure ventilation via supraglottic airway devices: an observational study | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/anae.16078 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85163678022 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 78 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 9 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1112 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 1119 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1365-2044 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:001018522300001 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0003-2409 | - |