File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Adaptability analysis methods of demand responsive transit: a review and future directions

TitleAdaptability analysis methods of demand responsive transit: a review and future directions
Authors
Keywordsadaptability analysis
agent-based models
boundary condition decision models
case studies
Demand-responsive transit
evaluation models
Issue Date8-Jan-2023
PublisherTaylor and Francis Group
Citation
Transport Reviews, 2023, v. 43, n. 4, p. 676-697 How to Cite?
Abstract

Demand responsive transit (DRT) echoes the new requirements of modern travel on flexibility and carbon reduction, as well as achieving a better match between demand and supply. However, many DRTs still failed. An important step named adaptability analysis helps to understand the context, desirability, and feasibility of introducing DRT. An adaptability analysis includes three sub-questions. Question 1 focuses on policy, regulation, funding, and technologies. Question 2 looks at the interactions of travel demand with operation parameters such as fare and fleet size. Question 3 tries to figure out the impacts of DRT on mobility, society, and the environment. To answer Question 1, macro-level methods collect information and generalise from empirical knowledge, including experience and barriers from real-world operation cases. To answer Question 2, meso-level methods determine the operation mode of DRT by quantifying related factors and establishing evaluation models or boundary condition decision models. To answer Question 3, micro-level methods use microscopic models for simulating the interaction between passengers and vehicles under different scenarios. This paper further discusses the advantages, disadvantages, and future directions of adaptability analysis methods of DRT. Overall, DRT presents great potential and future adaptability analysis should be developed by considering new trends in DRT and more complex and practical-oriented scenarios.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/337424
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 9.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.016
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hui-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Jinyang-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Pengling-
dc.contributor.authorTeng, Jing-
dc.contributor.authorLoo, Becky Pui Ying-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:20:46Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:20:46Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01-08-
dc.identifier.citationTransport Reviews, 2023, v. 43, n. 4, p. 676-697-
dc.identifier.issn0144-1647-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/337424-
dc.description.abstract<p>Demand responsive transit (DRT) echoes the new requirements of modern travel on flexibility and carbon reduction, as well as achieving a better match between demand and supply. However, many DRTs still failed. An important step named adaptability analysis helps to understand the context, desirability, and feasibility of introducing DRT. An adaptability analysis includes three sub-questions. Question 1 focuses on policy, regulation, funding, and technologies. Question 2 looks at the interactions of travel demand with operation parameters such as fare and fleet size. Question 3 tries to figure out the impacts of DRT on mobility, society, and the environment. To answer Question 1, macro-level methods collect information and generalise from empirical knowledge, including experience and barriers from real-world operation cases. To answer Question 2, meso-level methods determine the operation mode of DRT by quantifying related factors and establishing evaluation models or boundary condition decision models. To answer Question 3, micro-level methods use microscopic models for simulating the interaction between passengers and vehicles under different scenarios. This paper further discusses the advantages, disadvantages, and future directions of adaptability analysis methods of DRT. Overall, DRT presents great potential and future adaptability analysis should be developed by considering new trends in DRT and more complex and practical-oriented scenarios.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Group-
dc.relation.ispartofTransport Reviews-
dc.subjectadaptability analysis-
dc.subjectagent-based models-
dc.subjectboundary condition decision models-
dc.subjectcase studies-
dc.subjectDemand-responsive transit-
dc.subjectevaluation models-
dc.titleAdaptability analysis methods of demand responsive transit: a review and future directions-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01441647.2023.2165574-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85146723197-
dc.identifier.volume43-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage676-
dc.identifier.epage697-
dc.identifier.eissn1464-5327-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000909504000001-
dc.identifier.issnl0144-1647-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats