File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL

Article: Enforcing Global Health Law in Domestic Legal Systems: A Case Study of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region

TitleEnforcing Global Health Law in Domestic Legal Systems: A Case Study of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
Authors
Issue Date9-May-2023
PublisherTsinghua Law School, Tsinghua University
Citation
Tsinghua China Law Review, 2023, v. 14, n. 1, p. 99-124 How to Cite?
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has sparked considerable interest in global health law, the scholarship of which, focused on the global level, typically neglects the careful study of how global health law is enforced on the ground in municipal legal systems, without which most global legal and regulatory norms promoting and protecting health remain empty promises, no matter how flawlessly they may have been drafted. This Article contributes to supplying this gap with a detailed case study of global health law as it is enforced in the legal system of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, a vibrant common law jurisdiction deeply engaged in global health governance while being part of the People’s Republic of China, the world’s most populous country. Drawing on the International Health Regulations (2005), the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, the international right to health, and soft law instruments related to global health as examples of implementation, it is revealed that the enforcement of global health law even in Hong Kong, an economically and legally advanced jurisdiction, is uneven, and too often implicit, a phenomenon that reflects global health law’s own fragmentation. That being said, global health law, which embodies the collective wisdom and consensus of the international community over matters of health policy, should still be taken seriously at the domestic level, despite Hong Kong’s public health achievements had been more or less attained prior to its domestication of the abovementioned global health legal instruments. Notwithstanding the usual consequentialness of case law in a common law system, Hong Kong courts have played a marginal role in the domestication of global health law. This state of affairs calls for the development of principles to govern the coherent implementation of global health law in the local legal system, during which the courts can play a constructive role.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/337710
ISSN
2022 Impact Factor: 0.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.101

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIp, Chi Yeung Eric-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:23:16Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:23:16Z-
dc.date.issued2023-05-09-
dc.identifier.citationTsinghua China Law Review, 2023, v. 14, n. 1, p. 99-124-
dc.identifier.issn2151-8904-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/337710-
dc.description.abstract<p>The COVID-19 pandemic has sparked considerable interest in global health law, the scholarship of which, focused on the global level, typically neglects the careful study of how global health law is enforced on the ground in municipal legal systems, without which most global legal and regulatory norms promoting and protecting health remain empty promises, no matter how flawlessly they may have been drafted. This Article contributes to supplying this gap with a detailed case study of global health law as it is enforced in the legal system of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, a vibrant common law jurisdiction deeply engaged in global health governance while being part of the People’s Republic of China, the world’s most populous country. Drawing on the International Health Regulations (2005), the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, the international right to health, and soft law instruments related to global health as examples of implementation, it is revealed that the enforcement of global health law even in Hong Kong, an economically and legally advanced jurisdiction, is uneven, and too often implicit, a phenomenon that reflects global health law’s own fragmentation. That being said, global health law, which embodies the collective wisdom and consensus of the international community over matters of health policy, should still be taken seriously at the domestic level, despite Hong Kong’s public health achievements had been more or less attained prior to its domestication of the abovementioned global health legal instruments. Notwithstanding the usual consequentialness of case law in a common law system, Hong Kong courts have played a marginal role in the domestication of global health law. This state of affairs calls for the development of principles to govern the coherent implementation of global health law in the local legal system, during which the courts can play a constructive role.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherTsinghua Law School, Tsinghua University-
dc.relation.ispartofTsinghua China Law Review-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleEnforcing Global Health Law in Domestic Legal Systems: A Case Study of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.volume14-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage99-
dc.identifier.epage124-
dc.identifier.issnl2151-8904-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats