File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A Dual-Chamber Leadless Pacemaker

TitleA Dual-Chamber Leadless Pacemaker
Authors
KeywordsArrhythmias/Pacemakers/Defibrillators
Cardiology
Cardiology General
Issue Date20-May-2023
PublisherMassachusetts Medical Society
Citation
New England Journal of Medicine, 2023, v. 388, n. 25, p. 2360-2370 How to Cite?
Abstract

BackgroundSingle-chamber ventricular leadless pacemakers do not support atrial pacing or consistent atrioventricular synchrony. A dual-chamber leadless pacemaker system consisting of two devices implanted percutaneously, one in the right atrium and one in the right ventricle, would make leadless pacemaker therapy a treatment option for a wider range of indications.MethodsWe conducted a prospective, multicenter, single-group study to evaluate the safety and performance of a dual-chamber leadless pacemaker system. Patients with a conventional indication for dual-chamber pacing were eligible for participation. The primary safety end point was freedom from complications (i.e., device- or procedure-related serious adverse events) at 90 days. The first primary performance end point was a combination of adequate atrial capture threshold and sensing amplitude at 3 months. The second primary performance end point was at least 70% atrioventricular synchrony at 3 months while the patient was sitting.ResultsAmong the 300 patients enrolled, 190 (63.3%) had sinus-node dysfunction and 100 (33.3%) had atrioventricular block as the primary pacing indication. The implantation procedure was successful (i.e., two functioning leadless pacemakers were implanted and had established implant-to-implant communication) in 295 patients (98.3%). A total of 35 device- or procedure-related serious adverse events occurred in 29 patients. The primary safety end point was met in 271 patients (90.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 87.0 to 93.7), which exceeded the performance goal of 78% (P<0.001). The first primary performance end point was met in 90.2% of the patients (95% CI, 86.8 to 93.6), which exceeded the performance goal of 82.5% (P<0.001). The mean (+/- SD) atrial capture threshold was 0.82 +/- 0.70 V, and the mean P-wave amplitude was 3.58 +/- 1.88 mV. Of the 21 patients (7%) with a P-wave amplitude of less than 1.0 mV, none required device revision for inadequate sensing. At least 70% atrioventricular synchrony was achieved in 97.3% of the patients (95% CI, 95.4 to 99.3), which exceeded the performance goal of 83% (P<0.001).ConclusionsThe dual-chamber leadless pacemaker system met the primary safety end point and provided atrial pacing and reliable atrioventricular synchrony for 3 months after implantation. (Funded by Abbott Medical; Aveir DR i2i ClinicalTrials.gov number, .)


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338216
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 176.079
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 19.889
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKnops, RE-
dc.contributor.authorReddy, VY-
dc.contributor.authorIp, JE-
dc.contributor.authorDoshi, R-
dc.contributor.authorExner, DV-
dc.contributor.authorDefaye, P-
dc.contributor.authorCanby, R-
dc.contributor.authorBongiorni, MG-
dc.contributor.authorShoda, M-
dc.contributor.authorHindricks, G-
dc.contributor.authorNeuzil, P-
dc.contributor.authorRashtian, M-
dc.contributor.authorBreeman, KTN-
dc.contributor.authorNevo, JR-
dc.contributor.authorGanz, L-
dc.contributor.authorHubbard, C-
dc.contributor.authorCantillon, DJ-
dc.contributor.authorTse, Hung Fat-
dc.contributor.authorAveir DR i2i Study Investigators-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:27:08Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:27:08Z-
dc.date.issued2023-05-20-
dc.identifier.citationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2023, v. 388, n. 25, p. 2360-2370-
dc.identifier.issn0028-4793-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338216-
dc.description.abstract<p>BackgroundSingle-chamber ventricular leadless pacemakers do not support atrial pacing or consistent atrioventricular synchrony. A dual-chamber leadless pacemaker system consisting of two devices implanted percutaneously, one in the right atrium and one in the right ventricle, would make leadless pacemaker therapy a treatment option for a wider range of indications.MethodsWe conducted a prospective, multicenter, single-group study to evaluate the safety and performance of a dual-chamber leadless pacemaker system. Patients with a conventional indication for dual-chamber pacing were eligible for participation. The primary safety end point was freedom from complications (i.e., device- or procedure-related serious adverse events) at 90 days. The first primary performance end point was a combination of adequate atrial capture threshold and sensing amplitude at 3 months. The second primary performance end point was at least 70% atrioventricular synchrony at 3 months while the patient was sitting.ResultsAmong the 300 patients enrolled, 190 (63.3%) had sinus-node dysfunction and 100 (33.3%) had atrioventricular block as the primary pacing indication. The implantation procedure was successful (i.e., two functioning leadless pacemakers were implanted and had established implant-to-implant communication) in 295 patients (98.3%). A total of 35 device- or procedure-related serious adverse events occurred in 29 patients. The primary safety end point was met in 271 patients (90.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 87.0 to 93.7), which exceeded the performance goal of 78% (P<0.001). The first primary performance end point was met in 90.2% of the patients (95% CI, 86.8 to 93.6), which exceeded the performance goal of 82.5% (P<0.001). The mean (+/- SD) atrial capture threshold was 0.82 +/- 0.70 V, and the mean P-wave amplitude was 3.58 +/- 1.88 mV. Of the 21 patients (7%) with a P-wave amplitude of less than 1.0 mV, none required device revision for inadequate sensing. At least 70% atrioventricular synchrony was achieved in 97.3% of the patients (95% CI, 95.4 to 99.3), which exceeded the performance goal of 83% (P<0.001).ConclusionsThe dual-chamber leadless pacemaker system met the primary safety end point and provided atrial pacing and reliable atrioventricular synchrony for 3 months after implantation. (Funded by Abbott Medical; Aveir DR i2i ClinicalTrials.gov number, .)<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherMassachusetts Medical Society-
dc.relation.ispartofNew England Journal of Medicine-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectArrhythmias/Pacemakers/Defibrillators-
dc.subjectCardiology-
dc.subjectCardiology General-
dc.titleA Dual-Chamber Leadless Pacemaker-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1056/NEJMoa2300080-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85163919700-
dc.identifier.volume388-
dc.identifier.issue25-
dc.identifier.spage2360-
dc.identifier.epage2370-
dc.identifier.eissn1533-4406-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000992862900001-
dc.identifier.issnl0028-4793-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats