File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Between the Prerogative and the Normative States: The Evolving Power to Detain in China's Political-Legal System

TitleBetween the Prerogative and the Normative States: The Evolving Power to Detain in China's Political-Legal System
Authors
Keywordscriminal justice
detention
dual state
judicial review
legality
normative state
prerogative state
rights
Issue Date25-May-2022
PublisherDe Gruyter
Citation
Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 2022, v. 16, n. 1, p. 61-97 How to Cite?
AbstractThis article uses Ernst Fraenkel's dual-state framework as an analytical tool to study those conflicting imperatives and constitutional tensions with a focus on the power to detain. This article makes the argument that China has emerged as a dual state with a normal state that functions increasingly with a rule-based government in inter-personal matters and a prerogative state that solidifies control in areas that are regarded as political sensitive. Overall, while the equilibrium between the normative and prerogative states has been evolving in China, it has remained stable. The Party has been able to build a relatively self-defined and self-referencing legal system to provide the certainty and order that the Chinese political economy demands while maintaining a zone of exception, expansive and continuing to evolve, for the prerogative state to safeguard authoritarian rule.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338229
ISSN
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.372

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFu, H-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:27:14Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:27:14Z-
dc.date.issued2022-05-25-
dc.identifier.citationLaw & Ethics of Human Rights, 2022, v. 16, n. 1, p. 61-97-
dc.identifier.issn2194-6531-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338229-
dc.description.abstractThis article uses Ernst Fraenkel's dual-state framework as an analytical tool to study those conflicting imperatives and constitutional tensions with a focus on the power to detain. This article makes the argument that China has emerged as a dual state with a normal state that functions increasingly with a rule-based government in inter-personal matters and a prerogative state that solidifies control in areas that are regarded as political sensitive. Overall, while the equilibrium between the normative and prerogative states has been evolving in China, it has remained stable. The Party has been able to build a relatively self-defined and self-referencing legal system to provide the certainty and order that the Chinese political economy demands while maintaining a zone of exception, expansive and continuing to evolve, for the prerogative state to safeguard authoritarian rule.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherDe Gruyter-
dc.relation.ispartofLaw & Ethics of Human Rights-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectcriminal justice-
dc.subjectdetention-
dc.subjectdual state-
dc.subjectjudicial review-
dc.subjectlegality-
dc.subjectnormative state-
dc.subjectprerogative state-
dc.subjectrights-
dc.titleBetween the Prerogative and the Normative States: The Evolving Power to Detain in China's Political-Legal System-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/lehr-2022-2006-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85134767405-
dc.identifier.volume16-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage61-
dc.identifier.epage97-
dc.identifier.eissn1938-2545-
dc.identifier.issnl1938-2545-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats