File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1515/lehr-2022-2006
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85134767405
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Between the Prerogative and the Normative States: The Evolving Power to Detain in China's Political-Legal System
Title | Between the Prerogative and the Normative States: The Evolving Power to Detain in China's Political-Legal System |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | criminal justice detention dual state judicial review legality normative state prerogative state rights |
Issue Date | 25-May-2022 |
Publisher | De Gruyter |
Citation | Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 2022, v. 16, n. 1, p. 61-97 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This article uses Ernst Fraenkel's dual-state framework as an analytical tool to study those conflicting imperatives and constitutional tensions with a focus on the power to detain. This article makes the argument that China has emerged as a dual state with a normal state that functions increasingly with a rule-based government in inter-personal matters and a prerogative state that solidifies control in areas that are regarded as political sensitive. Overall, while the equilibrium between the normative and prerogative states has been evolving in China, it has remained stable. The Party has been able to build a relatively self-defined and self-referencing legal system to provide the certainty and order that the Chinese political economy demands while maintaining a zone of exception, expansive and continuing to evolve, for the prerogative state to safeguard authoritarian rule. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/338229 |
ISSN | 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.372 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Fu, H | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-11T10:27:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-11T10:27:14Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-05-25 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 2022, v. 16, n. 1, p. 61-97 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2194-6531 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/338229 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article uses Ernst Fraenkel's dual-state framework as an analytical tool to study those conflicting imperatives and constitutional tensions with a focus on the power to detain. This article makes the argument that China has emerged as a dual state with a normal state that functions increasingly with a rule-based government in inter-personal matters and a prerogative state that solidifies control in areas that are regarded as political sensitive. Overall, while the equilibrium between the normative and prerogative states has been evolving in China, it has remained stable. The Party has been able to build a relatively self-defined and self-referencing legal system to provide the certainty and order that the Chinese political economy demands while maintaining a zone of exception, expansive and continuing to evolve, for the prerogative state to safeguard authoritarian rule. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | De Gruyter | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Law & Ethics of Human Rights | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | criminal justice | - |
dc.subject | detention | - |
dc.subject | dual state | - |
dc.subject | judicial review | - |
dc.subject | legality | - |
dc.subject | normative state | - |
dc.subject | prerogative state | - |
dc.subject | rights | - |
dc.title | Between the Prerogative and the Normative States: The Evolving Power to Detain in China's Political-Legal System | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1515/lehr-2022-2006 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85134767405 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 16 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 61 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 97 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1938-2545 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1938-2545 | - |