File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Intellectual Property Protection in Outer Space: Conflict in Theory and Application in Practice

TitleIntellectual Property Protection in Outer Space: Conflict in Theory and Application in Practice
Authors
KeywordsIntellectual property
Outer space
Quasi-territorial jurisdiction
Space commercialization
Territoriality
Issue Date1-Aug-2022
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Space Policy, 2022, v. 61 How to Cite?
Abstract

The granting of intellectual property protection to space activities plays a significant role in promoting the sustainable development of space commercialization. However, the international intellectual property treaties have not explicitly stated in their provisions the issue of intellectual property protection in outer space, neither the provisions of the five outer space treaties explicitly address the legal issue. Such legal uncertainty may discourage States and non-governmental entities from actively participating in commercial space activities. One concerned rationale resulting in such legal status is the territoriality conflict in theory between the legal regimes of outer space and intellectual property. This article purports to illustrate territoriality conflict in theory between legal regimes of outer space and intellectual property. It then moves to argue that the conflict is proved to be a problem that exists purely in legal theory rather than legal practice because the legal value of Article VIII of the Outer Space Treaty elaborately reconciled the territoriality conflict in theory and offers a self-contained mechanism that would allow guaranteed levels of intellectual property protection in outer space. This mechanism employs space objects as a connecting factor to link space activities with the existing laws of the State of registry to realize the purpose of intellectual property protection in outer space.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338450
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.668
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, Z-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Y-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:28:59Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:28:59Z-
dc.date.issued2022-08-01-
dc.identifier.citationSpace Policy, 2022, v. 61-
dc.identifier.issn0265-9646-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338450-
dc.description.abstract<p>The granting of intellectual property protection to space activities plays a significant role in promoting the sustainable development of space commercialization. However, the international intellectual property treaties have not explicitly stated in their provisions the issue of intellectual property protection in outer space, neither the provisions of the five outer space treaties explicitly address the legal issue. Such legal uncertainty may discourage States and non-governmental entities from actively participating in commercial space activities. One concerned rationale resulting in such legal status is the territoriality conflict in theory between the legal regimes of outer space and intellectual property. This article purports to illustrate territoriality conflict in theory between legal regimes of outer space and intellectual property. It then moves to argue that the conflict is proved to be a problem that exists purely in legal theory rather than legal practice because the legal value of Article VIII of the Outer Space Treaty elaborately reconciled the territoriality conflict in theory and offers a self-contained mechanism that would allow guaranteed levels of intellectual property protection in outer space. This mechanism employs space objects as a connecting factor to link space activities with the existing laws of the State of registry to realize the purpose of intellectual property protection in outer space.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofSpace Policy-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectIntellectual property-
dc.subjectOuter space-
dc.subjectQuasi-territorial jurisdiction-
dc.subjectSpace commercialization-
dc.subjectTerritoriality-
dc.titleIntellectual Property Protection in Outer Space: Conflict in Theory and Application in Practice-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.spacepol.2022.101484-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85127329061-
dc.identifier.volume61-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-338X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000848219200008-
dc.identifier.issnl0265-9646-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats