File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Minimum 3-year experience with vertebral body tethering for treating scoliosis: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

TitleMinimum 3-year experience with vertebral body tethering for treating scoliosis: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis
Authors
Keywordseffectiveness
meta-analysis
safety
scoliosis
systematic review
Vertebral body tethering
Issue Date24-Nov-2022
PublisherSAGE Publications
Citation
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 2022, v. 30, n. 3 How to Cite?
Abstract

Purpose

Over the past 12 years, vertebral body tethering (VBT) has been gradually promoted for treating scoliosis, but there are few published studies, with only short-term follow-up. This study aimed to systematically review VBT efficacy and safety for treating scoliosis.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on VBT treatment of scoliosis published up to November 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in included studies. Data on clinical efficacy, unplanned reoperations, and complications were extracted. The meta-analysis was performed with R 4.1.0.

Results

Twenty-six studies involving 1045 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The correction rate of major curve immediately post-operation was 46.6% ± 13.8% (16%–69%) and that at final follow-up was 53.2% ± 17.9% (16%–79%). The single-arm meta-analysis results of all included studies showed that VBT was effective in general. The overall clinical success rate was 73.02% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 68.31%–78.05%). The pooled overall unplanned reoperation rate was 8.66% (95% CI: 5.53%–13.31%). The overall incidence rate of complications was 36.8% (95% CI: 23.9%–49.7%). The subgroup analysis based on follow-up time indicated that patients with follow-up time >36 months had increased clinical success rate, unplanned reoperation rate, and incidence rate of complications compared with those with <36 months’ follow-up time. The preliminary results showed that after 36 months of follow-up, only 7.17% (95% CI: 4.81%–10.55%) of patients required posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery and nearly 93% of patients avoided spinal fusion surgeries.

Conclusions

The current evidence from at least 3-year follow-up in different countries indicates that VBT is an effective surgical approach for treating scoliosis, with 73.88% of patients achieving clinical success. Nevertheless, about one in seven patients (15.8%) required unplanned reoperations, but only 7.17% required PSF. About half (52.17%) of the patients experienced complications. Due to the limitation of the study number and quality, our conclusion may be biased and requires verification by further studies with longer follow-up times.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338658
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.557
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhu, F-
dc.contributor.authorQiu, X-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, S-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, K Man-Chee-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:30:32Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:30:32Z-
dc.date.issued2022-11-24-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 2022, v. 30, n. 3-
dc.identifier.issn1022-5536-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338658-
dc.description.abstract<h3>Purpose</h3><p>Over the past 12 years, vertebral body tethering (VBT) has been gradually promoted for treating scoliosis, but there are few published studies, with only short-term follow-up. This study aimed to systematically review VBT efficacy and safety for treating scoliosis.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on VBT treatment of scoliosis published up to November 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in included studies. Data on clinical efficacy, unplanned reoperations, and complications were extracted. The meta-analysis was performed with R 4.1.0.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-six studies involving 1045 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The correction rate of major curve immediately post-operation was 46.6% ± 13.8% (16%–69%) and that at final follow-up was 53.2% ± 17.9% (16%–79%). The single-arm meta-analysis results of all included studies showed that VBT was effective in general. The overall clinical success rate was 73.02% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 68.31%–78.05%). The pooled overall unplanned reoperation rate was 8.66% (95% CI: 5.53%–13.31%). The overall incidence rate of complications was 36.8% (95% CI: 23.9%–49.7%). The subgroup analysis based on follow-up time indicated that patients with follow-up time >36 months had increased clinical success rate, unplanned reoperation rate, and incidence rate of complications compared with those with <36 months’ follow-up time. The preliminary results showed that after 36 months of follow-up, only 7.17% (95% CI: 4.81%–10.55%) of patients required posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery and nearly 93% of patients avoided spinal fusion surgeries.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The current evidence from at least 3-year follow-up in different countries indicates that VBT is an effective surgical approach for treating scoliosis, with 73.88% of patients achieving clinical success. Nevertheless, about one in seven patients (15.8%) required unplanned reoperations, but only 7.17% required PSF. About half (52.17%) of the patients experienced complications. Due to the limitation of the study number and quality, our conclusion may be biased and requires verification by further studies with longer follow-up times.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSAGE Publications-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjecteffectiveness-
dc.subjectmeta-analysis-
dc.subjectsafety-
dc.subjectscoliosis-
dc.subjectsystematic review-
dc.subjectVertebral body tethering-
dc.titleMinimum 3-year experience with vertebral body tethering for treating scoliosis: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/10225536221137753-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85142893111-
dc.identifier.volume30-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.eissn2309-4990-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000928089500001-
dc.identifier.issnl1022-5536-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats