File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1177/10225536221137753
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85142893111
- WOS: WOS:000928089500001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Minimum 3-year experience with vertebral body tethering for treating scoliosis: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis
Title | Minimum 3-year experience with vertebral body tethering for treating scoliosis: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | effectiveness meta-analysis safety scoliosis systematic review Vertebral body tethering |
Issue Date | 24-Nov-2022 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Citation | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 2022, v. 30, n. 3 How to Cite? |
Abstract | PurposeOver the past 12 years, vertebral body tethering (VBT) has been gradually promoted for treating scoliosis, but there are few published studies, with only short-term follow-up. This study aimed to systematically review VBT efficacy and safety for treating scoliosis. MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on VBT treatment of scoliosis published up to November 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in included studies. Data on clinical efficacy, unplanned reoperations, and complications were extracted. The meta-analysis was performed with R 4.1.0. ResultsTwenty-six studies involving 1045 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The correction rate of major curve immediately post-operation was 46.6% ± 13.8% (16%–69%) and that at final follow-up was 53.2% ± 17.9% (16%–79%). The single-arm meta-analysis results of all included studies showed that VBT was effective in general. The overall clinical success rate was 73.02% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 68.31%–78.05%). The pooled overall unplanned reoperation rate was 8.66% (95% CI: 5.53%–13.31%). The overall incidence rate of complications was 36.8% (95% CI: 23.9%–49.7%). The subgroup analysis based on follow-up time indicated that patients with follow-up time >36 months had increased clinical success rate, unplanned reoperation rate, and incidence rate of complications compared with those with <36 months’ follow-up time. The preliminary results showed that after 36 months of follow-up, only 7.17% (95% CI: 4.81%–10.55%) of patients required posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery and nearly 93% of patients avoided spinal fusion surgeries. ConclusionsThe current evidence from at least 3-year follow-up in different countries indicates that VBT is an effective surgical approach for treating scoliosis, with 73.88% of patients achieving clinical success. Nevertheless, about one in seven patients (15.8%) required unplanned reoperations, but only 7.17% required PSF. About half (52.17%) of the patients experienced complications. Due to the limitation of the study number and quality, our conclusion may be biased and requires verification by further studies with longer follow-up times. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/338658 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.557 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Zhu, F | - |
dc.contributor.author | Qiu, X | - |
dc.contributor.author | Liu, S | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, K Man-Chee | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-11T10:30:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-11T10:30:32Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-11-24 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 2022, v. 30, n. 3 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1022-5536 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/338658 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <h3>Purpose</h3><p>Over the past 12 years, vertebral body tethering (VBT) has been gradually promoted for treating scoliosis, but there are few published studies, with only short-term follow-up. This study aimed to systematically review VBT efficacy and safety for treating scoliosis.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on VBT treatment of scoliosis published up to November 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in included studies. Data on clinical efficacy, unplanned reoperations, and complications were extracted. The meta-analysis was performed with R 4.1.0.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-six studies involving 1045 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The correction rate of major curve immediately post-operation was 46.6% ± 13.8% (16%–69%) and that at final follow-up was 53.2% ± 17.9% (16%–79%). The single-arm meta-analysis results of all included studies showed that VBT was effective in general. The overall clinical success rate was 73.02% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 68.31%–78.05%). The pooled overall unplanned reoperation rate was 8.66% (95% CI: 5.53%–13.31%). The overall incidence rate of complications was 36.8% (95% CI: 23.9%–49.7%). The subgroup analysis based on follow-up time indicated that patients with follow-up time >36 months had increased clinical success rate, unplanned reoperation rate, and incidence rate of complications compared with those with <36 months’ follow-up time. The preliminary results showed that after 36 months of follow-up, only 7.17% (95% CI: 4.81%–10.55%) of patients required posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery and nearly 93% of patients avoided spinal fusion surgeries.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The current evidence from at least 3-year follow-up in different countries indicates that VBT is an effective surgical approach for treating scoliosis, with 73.88% of patients achieving clinical success. Nevertheless, about one in seven patients (15.8%) required unplanned reoperations, but only 7.17% required PSF. About half (52.17%) of the patients experienced complications. Due to the limitation of the study number and quality, our conclusion may be biased and requires verification by further studies with longer follow-up times.</p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | SAGE Publications | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | effectiveness | - |
dc.subject | meta-analysis | - |
dc.subject | safety | - |
dc.subject | scoliosis | - |
dc.subject | systematic review | - |
dc.subject | Vertebral body tethering | - |
dc.title | Minimum 3-year experience with vertebral body tethering for treating scoliosis: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/10225536221137753 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85142893111 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 30 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2309-4990 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000928089500001 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1022-5536 | - |