File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The aquaculture supply chain in the time of covid-19 pandemic: Vulnerability, resilience, solutions and priorities at the global scale

TitleThe aquaculture supply chain in the time of covid-19 pandemic: Vulnerability, resilience, solutions and priorities at the global scale
Authors
KeywordsCOVID-19 effects
Disruption
Economic distress
Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture
Mitigation measures
Perishable food supply chain
Rapid assessment
Stakeholder perceptions
Issue Date27-Oct-2021
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Environmental Science and Policy, 2021, v. 127, p. 98-110 How to Cite?
AbstractThe COVID-19 global pandemic has had severe, unpredictable and synchronous impacts on all levels of perishable food supply chains (PFSC), across multiple sectors and spatial scales. Aquaculture plays a vital and rapidly expanding role in food security, in some cases overtaking wild caught fisheries in the production of high-quality animal protein in this PFSC. We performed a rapid global assessment to evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and related emerging control measures on the aquaculture supply chain. Socio-economic effects of the pandemic were analysed by surveying the perceptions of stakeholders, who were asked to describe potential supply-side disruption, vulnerabilities and resilience patterns along the production pipeline with four main supply chain components: a) hatchery, b) production/processing, c) distribution/logistics and d) market. We also assessed different farming strategies, comparing land- vs. sea-based systems; extensive vs. intensive methods; and with and without integrated multi-trophic aquaculture, IMTA. In addition to evaluating levels and sources of economic distress, interviewees were asked to identify mitigation solutions adopted at local / internal (i.e., farm-site) scales, and to express their preference on national / external scale mitigation measures among a set of a priori options. Survey responses identified the potential causes of disruption, ripple effects, sources of food insecurity, and socio-economic conflicts. They also pointed to various levels of mitigation strategies. The collated evidence represents a first baseline useful to address future disaster-driven responses, to reinforce the resilience of the sector and to facilitate the design reconstruction plans and mitigation measures, such as financial aid strategies.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338690
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 6.424
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.716

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMangano, MC-
dc.contributor.authorBerlino, M-
dc.contributor.authorCorbari, L-
dc.contributor.authorMilisenda, G-
dc.contributor.authorLucchese, M-
dc.contributor.authorTerzo, S-
dc.contributor.authorBosch-Belmar, M-
dc.contributor.authorAzaza, MS-
dc.contributor.authorBabarro, JMF-
dc.contributor.authorBakiu, R-
dc.contributor.authorBroitman, BR-
dc.contributor.authorBuschmann, AH-
dc.contributor.authorChristofoletti, R-
dc.contributor.authorDong, Y-
dc.contributor.authorGlamuzina, B-
dc.contributor.authorLuthman, O-
dc.contributor.authorMakridis, P-
dc.contributor.authorNogueira, AJA-
dc.contributor.authorPalomo, MG-
dc.contributor.authorDineshram, R-
dc.contributor.authorSanchez-Jerez, P-
dc.contributor.authorSevgili, H-
dc.contributor.authorTroell, M-
dc.contributor.authorAbouelFadl, KY-
dc.contributor.authorAzra, MN-
dc.contributor.authorBritz, P-
dc.contributor.authorCarrington, E-
dc.contributor.authorCelić, I-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, F-
dc.contributor.authorQin, C-
dc.contributor.authorDionísio, MA-
dc.contributor.authorDobroslavić, T-
dc.contributor.authorGalli, P-
dc.contributor.authorGiannetto, D-
dc.contributor.authorGrabowski, JH-
dc.contributor.authorHelmuth, B-
dc.contributor.authorLebata-Ramos, MJH-
dc.contributor.authorLim, PT-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Y-
dc.contributor.authorLlorens, SM-
dc.contributor.authorMirto, S-
dc.contributor.authorPećarević, M-
dc.contributor.authorPita, C-
dc.contributor.authorRagg, N-
dc.contributor.authorRavagnan, E-
dc.contributor.authorSaidi, D-
dc.contributor.authorSchultz, K-
dc.contributor.authorShaltout, M-
dc.contributor.authorTan, SH-
dc.contributor.authorThiyagarajan, V-
dc.contributor.authorSarà, G-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:30:48Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:30:48Z-
dc.date.issued2021-10-27-
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Science and Policy, 2021, v. 127, p. 98-110-
dc.identifier.issn1462-9011-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338690-
dc.description.abstractThe COVID-19 global pandemic has had severe, unpredictable and synchronous impacts on all levels of perishable food supply chains (PFSC), across multiple sectors and spatial scales. Aquaculture plays a vital and rapidly expanding role in food security, in some cases overtaking wild caught fisheries in the production of high-quality animal protein in this PFSC. We performed a rapid global assessment to evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and related emerging control measures on the aquaculture supply chain. Socio-economic effects of the pandemic were analysed by surveying the perceptions of stakeholders, who were asked to describe potential supply-side disruption, vulnerabilities and resilience patterns along the production pipeline with four main supply chain components: a) hatchery, b) production/processing, c) distribution/logistics and d) market. We also assessed different farming strategies, comparing land- vs. sea-based systems; extensive vs. intensive methods; and with and without integrated multi-trophic aquaculture, IMTA. In addition to evaluating levels and sources of economic distress, interviewees were asked to identify mitigation solutions adopted at local / internal (i.e., farm-site) scales, and to express their preference on national / external scale mitigation measures among a set of a priori options. Survey responses identified the potential causes of disruption, ripple effects, sources of food insecurity, and socio-economic conflicts. They also pointed to various levels of mitigation strategies. The collated evidence represents a first baseline useful to address future disaster-driven responses, to reinforce the resilience of the sector and to facilitate the design reconstruction plans and mitigation measures, such as financial aid strategies.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Science and Policy-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectCOVID-19 effects-
dc.subjectDisruption-
dc.subjectEconomic distress-
dc.subjectIntegrated multi-trophic aquaculture-
dc.subjectMitigation measures-
dc.subjectPerishable food supply chain-
dc.subjectRapid assessment-
dc.subjectStakeholder perceptions-
dc.titleThe aquaculture supply chain in the time of covid-19 pandemic: Vulnerability, resilience, solutions and priorities at the global scale-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.envsci.2021.10.014-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85118163556-
dc.identifier.volume127-
dc.identifier.spage98-
dc.identifier.epage110-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-6416-
dc.identifier.issnl1462-9011-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats