File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Assessment on the declining degree of farmland shelter forest in a desert oasis based on LiDAR and hyperspectrum imagery

TitleAssessment on the declining degree of farmland shelter forest in a desert oasis based on LiDAR and hyperspectrum imagery
基于激光雷达与高光谱的荒漠绿洲农田防护林衰退程度评估
Authors
Keywordsdegree of recession
hyperspectrum
LiDAR
random forest model
Issue Date1-Apr-2023
PublisherBeijing : Science Press
Citation
Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, v. 34, n. 4, p. 1043-1050 How to Cite?
Abstract

We examined the growth decline and health status of farmland protective forest belt (Populus alba var. pyramidalis and Populus simonii shelterbelts) in Ulanbuh Desert Oasis by using airborne hyperspectral and ground-based LiDAR to collect the hyperspectral images and point cloud data of the whole forest belt respectively. Through correlation analysis and stepwise regression analysis, we constructed the evaluation model of the decline degree of farmland protection forest with the spectral differential value, vegetation index, and forest structure parameters as independent variables and the tree canopy dead branch index of the field survey as dependent variables. We further tested the accuracy of the model. The results showed that the evaluation accuracy of the decline degree of P. alba var. pyramidalis and P. simonii by LiDAR method was better than that by hyperspectral method, and that the evaluation accuracy of the combined LiDAR and hyperspectral method was the highest. Using the LiDAR method, hyperspectral method, the combined method, the optimal model of P. alba var. pyramidalis was all light gradient boosting machine model, with the overall classification accuracy being 0.75, 0.68, 0.80, and Kappa coefficient being 0.58, 0.43, 0.66, respectively. The optimal model of P. simonii was random forest model, random forest model, and multilayer perceptron model, with the overall classification accuracy being 0.76, 0.62, 0.81, and Kappa coefficient being 0.60, 0.34, 0.71, respectively. This research method could accurately check and monitor the decline of plantations.


为准确检测荒漠绿洲区农田防护林带衰退和健康状况,本研究以乌兰布和荒漠绿洲新疆杨林带和小美旱杨林带为对象,使用机载高光谱与地基式激光雷达分别采集整体林带的高光谱影像和点云数据,通过相关性分析、逐步回归分析筛选的光谱微分值、植被指数、林木结构参数为自变量,以实地调查的林木冠层枯枝指数为因变量,构建农田防护林衰退程度评估模型,并对模型进行精度检验。结果表明:采用激光雷达方法对新疆杨和小美旱杨衰退程度的评估精度优于高光谱方法,激光雷达和高光谱相结合方法的评估精度最高。分别采用激光雷达方法、高光谱方法、两者结合方法,新疆杨最优模型均为轻量级梯度提升模型,总体分类准确度分别为0.75、0.68、0.80,Kappa系数分别为0.58、0.43、0.66;小美旱杨最优模型分别为随机森林模型、随机森林模型、多层感知机模型,总体分类准确度分别为0.76、0.62、0.81,Kappa系数分别为0.60、0.34、0.71。本研究方法可对人工林衰退状况进行精确的清查和监测。
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338799
ISSN
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.304

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYang, Yuli-
dc.contributor.authorXiao, Huijie-
dc.contributor.authorXin, Zhiming-
dc.contributor.authorFan, Guangpeng-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Junran-
dc.contributor.authorJia, Xiaoxiao-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Litao-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:31:37Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:31:37Z-
dc.date.issued2023-04-01-
dc.identifier.citationChinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, v. 34, n. 4, p. 1043-1050-
dc.identifier.issn1001-9332-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338799-
dc.description.abstract<p>We examined the growth decline and health status of farmland protective forest belt (Populus alba var. pyramidalis and Populus simonii shelterbelts) in Ulanbuh Desert Oasis by using airborne hyperspectral and ground-based LiDAR to collect the hyperspectral images and point cloud data of the whole forest belt respectively. Through correlation analysis and stepwise regression analysis, we constructed the evaluation model of the decline degree of farmland protection forest with the spectral differential value, vegetation index, and forest structure parameters as independent variables and the tree canopy dead branch index of the field survey as dependent variables. We further tested the accuracy of the model. The results showed that the evaluation accuracy of the decline degree of P. alba var. pyramidalis and P. simonii by LiDAR method was better than that by hyperspectral method, and that the evaluation accuracy of the combined LiDAR and hyperspectral method was the highest. Using the LiDAR method, hyperspectral method, the combined method, the optimal model of P. alba var. pyramidalis was all light gradient boosting machine model, with the overall classification accuracy being 0.75, 0.68, 0.80, and Kappa coefficient being 0.58, 0.43, 0.66, respectively. The optimal model of P. simonii was random forest model, random forest model, and multilayer perceptron model, with the overall classification accuracy being 0.76, 0.62, 0.81, and Kappa coefficient being 0.60, 0.34, 0.71, respectively. This research method could accurately check and monitor the decline of plantations.</p>-
dc.description.abstract为准确检测荒漠绿洲区农田防护林带衰退和健康状况,本研究以乌兰布和荒漠绿洲新疆杨林带和小美旱杨林带为对象,使用机载高光谱与地基式激光雷达分别采集整体林带的高光谱影像和点云数据,通过相关性分析、逐步回归分析筛选的光谱微分值、植被指数、林木结构参数为自变量,以实地调查的林木冠层枯枝指数为因变量,构建农田防护林衰退程度评估模型,并对模型进行精度检验。结果表明:采用激光雷达方法对新疆杨和小美旱杨衰退程度的评估精度优于高光谱方法,激光雷达和高光谱相结合方法的评估精度最高。分别采用激光雷达方法、高光谱方法、两者结合方法,新疆杨最优模型均为轻量级梯度提升模型,总体分类准确度分别为0.75、0.68、0.80,Kappa系数分别为0.58、0.43、0.66;小美旱杨最优模型分别为随机森林模型、随机森林模型、多层感知机模型,总体分类准确度分别为0.76、0.62、0.81,Kappa系数分别为0.60、0.34、0.71。本研究方法可对人工林衰退状况进行精确的清查和监测。-
dc.languagechi-
dc.publisherBeijing : Science Press-
dc.relation.ispartofChinese Journal of Applied Ecology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectdegree of recession-
dc.subjecthyperspectrum-
dc.subjectLiDAR-
dc.subjectrandom forest model-
dc.titleAssessment on the declining degree of farmland shelter forest in a desert oasis based on LiDAR and hyperspectrum imagery-
dc.title基于激光雷达与高光谱的荒漠绿洲农田防护林衰退程度评估-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.13287/j.1001-9332.202304.026-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85152978779-
dc.identifier.volume34-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage1043-
dc.identifier.epage1050-
dc.identifier.issnl1001-9332-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats