File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s43390-023-00794-8
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85177771673
- WOS: WOS:001108121200001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Incidence of back pain from initial presentation to 3 years of follow-up in subjects with untreated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Title | Incidence of back pain from initial presentation to 3 years of follow-up in subjects with untreated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Back pain Conservative treatment Incidence Natural history |
Issue Date | 28-Nov-2023 |
Publisher | Springer |
Citation | Spine Deformity, 2023, v. 12, p. 357-365 How to Cite? |
Abstract | BackgroundIntercoder reliability is a statistic commonly reported by researchers to demonstrate the rigour of coding procedures during data analysis. Its importance is debatable in the analysis of qualitative interview data. It raises a question on whether researchers should identify the same codes and themes in a transcript or they should produce different accounts in analyzing the transcript. PurposeThis study reports how articles in four science education journals, International Journal of Science Education, Research in Science Education, Journal of Research in Science Teaching and Science Education report intercoder reliability in their analysis of interview data. MethodsThis article explores whether 103 papers published in these science education journals in a single year (2019) have reported intercoder reliability test when the authors analyse their interview data. It was found that 19 papers have reported the test results. FindingsThe authors of these studies have different interpretation towards a similar value of intercoder reliability. Moreover, the percentage of data used in the intercoder reliability test and the identity of intercoder vary across the studies. As a result, this paper aims to raise an issue on whether a replicability of coding can show the reliability of the results when researchers analyze interview data. ConclusionWe propose two major principles when authors report the reliability of the analysis of interview data: transparency and explanatory. We also argue that only when the authors report intercoder reliability test results that are based on these two principles, the reliability statistics of studies are convincing to readers. Some suggestions are offered to authors regarding how to carry out, analyze and report the intercoder reliability test. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/339433 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.798 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lau, Kenney Ki Lee | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kwan, Kenny Yat Hong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, Jason Pui Yin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, Janus Siu Him | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shea, Graham Ka Hon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Law, Karlen Ka Pui | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, Kenneth Man Chee | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-11T10:36:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-11T10:36:34Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-11-28 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Spine Deformity, 2023, v. 12, p. 357-365 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2212-134X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/339433 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <h3>Background</h3><p>Intercoder reliability is a statistic commonly reported by researchers to demonstrate the rigour of coding procedures during data analysis. Its importance is debatable in the analysis of qualitative interview data. It raises a question on whether researchers should identify the same codes and themes in a transcript or they should produce different accounts in analyzing the transcript.</p><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study reports how articles in four science education journals, <em>International Journal of Science Education, Research in Science Education, Journal of Research in Science Teaching</em> and <em>Science Education</em> report intercoder reliability in their analysis of interview data.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This article explores whether 103 papers published in these science education journals in a single year (2019) have reported intercoder reliability test when the authors analyse their interview data. It was found that 19 papers have reported the test results.</p><h3>Findings</h3><p>The authors of these studies have different interpretation towards a similar value of intercoder reliability. Moreover, the percentage of data used in the intercoder reliability test and the identity of intercoder vary across the studies. As a result, this paper aims to raise an issue on whether a replicability of coding can show the reliability of the results when researchers analyze interview data.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We propose two major principles when authors report the reliability of the analysis of interview data: <em>transparency</em> and <em>explanatory</em>. We also argue that only when the authors report intercoder reliability test results that are based on these two principles, the reliability statistics of studies are convincing to readers. Some suggestions are offered to authors regarding how to carry out, analyze and report the intercoder reliability test.</p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Springer | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Spine Deformity | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis | - |
dc.subject | Back pain | - |
dc.subject | Conservative treatment | - |
dc.subject | Incidence | - |
dc.subject | Natural history | - |
dc.title | Incidence of back pain from initial presentation to 3 years of follow-up in subjects with untreated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s43390-023-00794-8 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85177771673 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 12 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 357 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 365 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2212-1358 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:001108121200001 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 2212-134X | - |