File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL

Article: Comparing the mental health effects of different social assistance programmes in Hong Kong

TitleComparing the mental health effects of different social assistance programmes in Hong Kong
Other Titles10.1080/17516234.2022.2144162
Authors
Issue Date15-Nov-2022
PublisherTaylor and Francis Group
Citation
Journal of Asian Public Policy, 2022 How to Cite?
Abstract

This study compares the mental health effects of different social assistance programmes. We proposed a theoretical framework to explain how social assistance programmes may affect recipients’ mental health through positive resource effect and negative stigma effect. We examined the mental health of people participating in one of three social assistance programmes in Hong Kong: Comprehensive Social Security Assistance (CSSA), Social Security Allowance (SSA) and education subsidies. We analysed two waves of data from the Hong Kong Panel Survey for Poverty Alleviation (2015, 2017). SSA and education subsidies had no impact on recipients’ mental health. SSA targets vulnerable groups such as people with disabilities and imposes minimal (or no) means tests. Education subsidies target families with school-age children and impose moderate means tests. The programme that exerted positive mental health effects on recipients was CSSA, the public assistance scheme that serves as the last resort for those who cannot financially support themselves. The positive relationship was largely driven by old-age recipients who were viewed as ‘deserving poor,’ and thus experienced less stigma. Our findings demonstrated that social assistance programmes can enhance the mental health of their beneficiaries, particularly when positive mental health effects associated with economic security override negative stigma effects.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/339503
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.525

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPeng, CH-
dc.contributor.authorYip, P S-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:37:09Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:37:09Z-
dc.date.issued2022-11-15-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Asian Public Policy, 2022-
dc.identifier.issn1751-6234-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/339503-
dc.description.abstract<p>This study compares the mental health effects of different social assistance programmes. We proposed a theoretical framework to explain how social assistance programmes may affect recipients’ mental health through positive resource effect and negative stigma effect. We examined the mental health of people participating in one of three social assistance programmes in Hong Kong: Comprehensive Social Security Assistance (CSSA), Social Security Allowance (SSA) and education subsidies. We analysed two waves of data from the Hong Kong Panel Survey for Poverty Alleviation (2015, 2017). SSA and education subsidies had no impact on recipients’ mental health. SSA targets vulnerable groups such as people with disabilities and imposes minimal (or no) means tests. Education subsidies target families with school-age children and impose moderate means tests. The programme that exerted positive mental health effects on recipients was CSSA, the public assistance scheme that serves as the last resort for those who cannot financially support themselves. The positive relationship was largely driven by old-age recipients who were viewed as ‘deserving poor,’ and thus experienced less stigma. Our findings demonstrated that social assistance programmes can enhance the mental health of their beneficiaries, particularly when positive mental health effects associated with economic security override negative stigma effects.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Group-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Asian Public Policy-
dc.titleComparing the mental health effects of different social assistance programmes in Hong Kong-
dc.title.alternative10.1080/17516234.2022.2144162-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.eissn1751-6242-
dc.identifier.issnl1751-6242-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats