File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Book Chapter: No Challenge Clauses in the Pharmaceutical Industry in Japan

TitleNo Challenge Clauses in the Pharmaceutical Industry in Japan
Authors
Issue Date8-Feb-2022
Abstract

This chapter focuses on the use and regulation of no challenge clauses in the pharmaceutical industry in Japan. Licensing activities are prevalent in this industry. Although no direct evidence has been found on the prevalence of no challenge clauses, there are reasons to believe that these clauses are common in the licensing agreements in the industry. This gives rise to the question of whether these clauses should be regulated under competition law, and if so, how. The chapter concludes that no challenge clauses should be subject to the purview of competition law due to their potential to inflict consumer harm. There are, however, two preconditions for such harm: that the underlying patent is invalid and that the patentee possesses market power over a patented technology or product. This result indicates that no challenge clauses should only be illegal when both preconditions are met. The Japan Fair Trade Commission’s approach to these clauses is largely consistent with these important theoretical insights.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/339518

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Thomas Kin Hon-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:37:17Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:37:17Z-
dc.date.issued2022-02-08-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/339518-
dc.description.abstract<p> <span>This chapter focuses on the use and regulation of no challenge clauses in the pharmaceutical industry in Japan. Licensing activities are prevalent in this industry. Although no direct evidence has been found on the prevalence of no challenge clauses, there are reasons to believe that these clauses are common in the licensing agreements in the industry. This gives rise to the question of whether these clauses should be regulated under competition law, and if so, how. The chapter concludes that no challenge clauses should be subject to the purview of competition law due to their potential to inflict consumer harm. There are, however, two preconditions for such harm: that the underlying patent is invalid and that the patentee possesses market power over a patented technology or product. This result indicates that no challenge clauses should only be illegal when both preconditions are met. The Japan Fair Trade Commission’s approach to these clauses is largely consistent with these important theoretical insights.</span> <br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofCompetition Law and Policy in the Japanese Pharmaceutical Sector-
dc.titleNo Challenge Clauses in the Pharmaceutical Industry in Japan-
dc.typeBook_Chapter-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-981-16-7814-1_10-
dc.identifier.spage159-
dc.identifier.epage179-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats