File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/1471-0528.17704
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85176089627
- WOS: WOS:001100232700001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Global impacts of COVID‐19 pandemic on sexual and reproductive health services: An international comparative study on primary care from the INTRePID Consortium
Title | Global impacts of COVID‐19 pandemic on sexual and reproductive health services: An international comparative study on primary care from the INTRePID Consortium |
---|---|
Authors | Peng, KangningTu, KarenLi, ZhuoHallinan, Christine MaryLaughlin, AdrianManski‐Nankervis, Jo‐AnneApajee, JemishaLapadula, María CarlaOrtigoza, AngelaDa Roza, Cecilia ClaraBaste, ValborgFlottorp, SigneWensaas, Knut‐ArneGoh, Lay HoonLing, Zheng JyeKristiansson, RobertGaona, GabrielaPace, Wilson DWestfall, John MNg, Amy Pui PuiWong, William Chi‐Wai |
Keywords | COVID-19 pandemic sexual and reproductive health |
Issue Date | 1-Mar-2024 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Citation | BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2024, v. 131, n. 4, p. 508-517 How to Cite? |
Abstract | ObjectiveTo understand how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted sexual and reproductive health (SRH) visits. DesignAn ecological study comparing SRH services volume in different countries before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. SettingSeven countries from the INTernational ConsoRtium of Primary Care BIg Data Researchers (INTRePID) across four continents. PopulationOver 3.8 million SRH visits to primary care physicians in Australia, China, Canada, Norway, Singapore, Sweden and the USA. MethodsDifference in average SRH monthly visits before and during the pandemic, with negative binomial regression modelling to compare predicted and observed number of visits during the pandemic for SRH visits. Main outcome measuresMonthly number of visits to primary care physicians from 2018 to 2021. ResultsDuring the pandemic, the average volume of monthly SRH visits increased in Canada (15.6%, 99% CI 8.1–23.0%) where virtual care was pronounced. China, Singapore, Sweden and the USA experienced a decline (−56.5%, 99% CI −74.5 to −38.5%; −22.7%, 99% CI −38.8 to −6.5%; −19.4%, 99% CI −28.3 to −10.6%; and −22.7%, 99% CI −38.8 to −6.5%, respectively); while Australia and Norway showed insignificant changes (6.5%, 99% CI −0.7 to –13.8% and 1.7%, 99% CI −6.4 to –9.8%). The countries that maintained (Australia, Norway) or surpassed (Canada) pre-pandemic visit rates had the greatest use of virtual care. ConclusionsIn-person SRH visits to primary care decreased during the pandemic. Virtual care seemed to counterbalance that decline. Although cervical cancer screening appeared insensitive to virtual care, strategies such as incorporating self-collected samples for HPV testing may provide a solution in a future pandemic. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/339680 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.858 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Peng, Kangning | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tu, Karen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Li, Zhuo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hallinan, Christine Mary | - |
dc.contributor.author | Laughlin, Adrian | - |
dc.contributor.author | Manski‐Nankervis, Jo‐Anne | - |
dc.contributor.author | Apajee, Jemisha | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lapadula, María Carla | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ortigoza, Angela | - |
dc.contributor.author | Da Roza, Cecilia Clara | - |
dc.contributor.author | Baste, Valborg | - |
dc.contributor.author | Flottorp, Signe | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wensaas, Knut‐Arne | - |
dc.contributor.author | Goh, Lay Hoon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ling, Zheng Jye | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kristiansson, Robert | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gaona, Gabriela | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pace, Wilson D | - |
dc.contributor.author | Westfall, John M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ng, Amy Pui Pui | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, William Chi‐Wai | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-11T10:38:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-11T10:38:32Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-03-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2024, v. 131, n. 4, p. 508-517 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1470-0328 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/339680 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <h3>Objective</h3><p>To understand how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted sexual and reproductive health (SRH) visits.</p><h3>Design</h3><p>An ecological study comparing SRH services volume in different countries before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><h3>Setting</h3><p>Seven countries from the <strong>INT</strong>ernational Conso<strong>R</strong>tium of <strong>P</strong>rimary Care B<strong>I</strong>g <strong>D</strong>ata Researchers (INTRePID) across four continents.</p><h3>Population</h3><p>Over 3.8 million SRH visits to primary care physicians in Australia, China, Canada, Norway, Singapore, Sweden and the USA.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Difference in average SRH monthly visits before and during the pandemic, with negative binomial regression modelling to compare predicted and observed number of visits during the pandemic for SRH visits.</p><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>Monthly number of visits to primary care physicians from 2018 to 2021.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>During the pandemic, the average volume of monthly SRH visits increased in Canada (15.6%, 99% CI 8.1–23.0%) where virtual care was pronounced. China, Singapore, Sweden and the USA experienced a decline (−56.5%, 99% CI −74.5 to −38.5%; −22.7%, 99% CI −38.8 to −6.5%; −19.4%, 99% CI −28.3 to −10.6%; and −22.7%, 99% CI −38.8 to −6.5%, respectively); while Australia and Norway showed insignificant changes (6.5%, 99% CI −0.7 to –13.8% and 1.7%, 99% CI −6.4 to –9.8%). The countries that maintained (Australia, Norway) or surpassed (Canada) pre-pandemic visit rates had the greatest use of virtual care.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In-person SRH visits to primary care decreased during the pandemic. Virtual care seemed to counterbalance that decline. Although cervical cancer screening appeared insensitive to virtual care, strategies such as incorporating self-collected samples for HPV testing may provide a solution in a future pandemic.</p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Wiley | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | COVID-19 pandemic | - |
dc.subject | sexual and reproductive health | - |
dc.title | Global impacts of COVID‐19 pandemic on sexual and reproductive health services: An international comparative study on primary care from the INTRePID Consortium | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/1471-0528.17704 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85176089627 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 131 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 508 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 517 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1471-0528 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:001100232700001 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1470-0328 | - |