File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: From Reliability to Resilience: More Than Just Taking One Step Further

TitleFrom Reliability to Resilience: More Than Just Taking One Step Further
Authors
KeywordsFault tolerance
Hazards
Maintenance engineering
Measurement
Multihazard
reliability
Reliability
Resilience
resilience
resilience metric
System performance
Issue Date21-Nov-2023
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Citation
IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2023, p. 1-5 How to Cite?
Abstract

Critical systems, such as telecommunication networks, power grids, transportation networks, and supply chains, have been dramatically expanded over the past decades. To avoid significant interruptions of their services, failure-prevention technologies and strategies have been explored extensively. However, in addition to inherent faults and expected failures, such systems are subject to natural and man-made hazards. The frequent occurrences of these hazards result in an increase in the systems’ operational uncertainty as well as significant disruptions of their services. Unfortunately, the traditional reliability metrics do not adequately describe a system's performance under such hazards. There is a need for assessing the resilience of a system, which characterizes the system's performance deterioration and restoration under hazards. To date, substantial effort has been devoted to describing and quantifying system resilience from different perspectives. However, conceptual understanding and visionary transition from traditional reliability to resilience are more than just taking one step further. In this article, we briefly review approaches that qualitatively and quantitatively assess system resilience and discuss their applicable scenarios and limitations. Challenges and opportunities in system resilience modeling and enhancement, such as multihazard resilience modeling and restoration sequence optimization, are also presented so that more reliability researchers and practitioners may dive into and contribute to this important area.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/339998
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.511
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Yao-
dc.contributor.authorLiao, Haitao-
dc.contributor.authorElsayed, Elsayed A-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:40:54Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:40:54Z-
dc.date.issued2023-11-21-
dc.identifier.citationIEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2023, p. 1-5-
dc.identifier.issn0018-9529-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/339998-
dc.description.abstract<p>Critical systems, such as telecommunication networks, power grids, transportation networks, and supply chains, have been dramatically expanded over the past decades. To avoid significant interruptions of their services, failure-prevention technologies and strategies have been explored extensively. However, in addition to inherent faults and expected failures, such systems are subject to natural and man-made hazards. The frequent occurrences of these hazards result in an increase in the systems’ operational uncertainty as well as significant disruptions of their services. Unfortunately, the traditional reliability metrics do not adequately describe a system's performance under such hazards. There is a need for assessing the resilience of a system, which characterizes the system's performance deterioration and restoration under hazards. To date, substantial effort has been devoted to describing and quantifying system resilience from different perspectives. However, conceptual understanding and visionary transition from traditional reliability to resilience are more than just taking one step further. In this article, we briefly review approaches that qualitatively and quantitatively assess system resilience and discuss their applicable scenarios and limitations. Challenges and opportunities in system resilience modeling and enhancement, such as multihazard resilience modeling and restoration sequence optimization, are also presented so that more reliability researchers and practitioners may dive into and contribute to this important area.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers-
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Transactions on Reliability-
dc.subjectFault tolerance-
dc.subjectHazards-
dc.subjectMaintenance engineering-
dc.subjectMeasurement-
dc.subjectMultihazard-
dc.subjectreliability-
dc.subjectReliability-
dc.subjectResilience-
dc.subjectresilience-
dc.subjectresilience metric-
dc.subjectSystem performance-
dc.titleFrom Reliability to Resilience: More Than Just Taking One Step Further-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/TR.2023.3330960-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85178042999-
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.epage5-
dc.identifier.eissn1558-1721-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001122761800001-
dc.identifier.issnl0018-9529-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats