File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The role of defeatist performance beliefs on cognitive effort-cost decision-making in schizophrenia

TitleThe role of defeatist performance beliefs on cognitive effort-cost decision-making in schizophrenia
Authors
KeywordsCognitive effort
Discounting
Negative symptoms
Reward processing
Schizophrenia
Issue Date1-Nov-2023
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Schizophrenia Research, 2023, v. 261, p. 216-224 How to Cite?
Abstract

Impairments in effort-cost decision-making have been consistently observed in people with schizophrenia (SZ) and may be an important mechanism of negative symptoms. However, the processes that give rise to impairments in effort-cost decision-making are unclear, leading to limited progress in identifying the most relevant treatment targets. Drawing from cognitive models of negative symptoms and goal-directed behavior, this study aimed to examine how and under what type of task conditions defeatist performance beliefs contribute to these decision-making processes. Outpatients with SZ (n = 30) and healthy controls (CN; n = 28) completed a cognitive effort allocation task, the Cognitive Effort-Discounting (COGED) task, which assesses participants' willingness to exert cognitive effort for monetary rewards based on parametrically varied working memory demands (completing N-back levels). Results showed that although participants with SZ demonstrated reduced willingness to work for rewards across N-back levels compared to CN participants, they showed less choice modulation across different N-back conditions. However, among SZ participants with greater defeatist performance beliefs, there was a reduced willingness to choose the high effort option at higher N-back levels (N-back levels 3, 4, and 5 versus 2-back). Results suggest that compared to CN, the SZ group's subjective willingness to expend effort largely did not dynamically adjust as cognitive load increased. However, defeatist beliefs may undermine willingness to expend cognitive effort, especially when cognitive task demands are high. These beliefs may be a viable treatment target to improve effort-cost decision-making impairments in people with SZ.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/340137
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.374
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLuther, L-
dc.contributor.authorWestbrook, A-
dc.contributor.authorAyawvi, G-
dc.contributor.authorRuiz, I-
dc.contributor.authorRaugh, IM-
dc.contributor.authorChu, AOK-
dc.contributor.authorChang, WC-
dc.contributor.authorStrauss, GP-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:41:56Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:41:56Z-
dc.date.issued2023-11-01-
dc.identifier.citationSchizophrenia Research, 2023, v. 261, p. 216-224-
dc.identifier.issn0920-9964-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/340137-
dc.description.abstract<p>Impairments in effort-cost decision-making have been consistently observed in people with schizophrenia (SZ) and may be an important mechanism of negative symptoms. However, the processes that give rise to impairments in effort-cost decision-making are unclear, leading to limited progress in identifying the most relevant treatment targets. Drawing from cognitive models of negative symptoms and goal-directed behavior, this study aimed to examine how and under what type of task conditions defeatist performance beliefs contribute to these decision-making processes. Outpatients with SZ (n = 30) and healthy controls (CN; n = 28) completed a cognitive effort allocation task, the Cognitive Effort-Discounting (COGED) task, which assesses participants' willingness to exert cognitive effort for monetary rewards based on parametrically varied working memory demands (completing N-back levels). Results showed that although participants with SZ demonstrated reduced willingness to work for rewards across N-back levels compared to CN participants, they showed less choice modulation across different N-back conditions. However, among SZ participants with greater defeatist performance beliefs, there was a reduced willingness to choose the high effort option at higher N-back levels (N-back levels 3, 4, and 5 versus 2-back). Results suggest that compared to CN, the SZ group's subjective willingness to expend effort largely did not dynamically adjust as cognitive load increased. However, defeatist beliefs may undermine willingness to expend cognitive effort, especially when cognitive task demands are high. These beliefs may be a viable treatment target to improve effort-cost decision-making impairments in people with SZ.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofSchizophrenia Research-
dc.subjectCognitive effort-
dc.subjectDiscounting-
dc.subjectNegative symptoms-
dc.subjectReward processing-
dc.subjectSchizophrenia-
dc.titleThe role of defeatist performance beliefs on cognitive effort-cost decision-making in schizophrenia-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.schres.2023.09.035-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85173045540-
dc.identifier.volume261-
dc.identifier.spage216-
dc.identifier.epage224-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001087352800001-
dc.identifier.issnl0920-9964-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats