File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: Building robustness for rural revitalization: A social-ecological system perspective

TitleBuilding robustness for rural revitalization: A social-ecological system perspective
Authors
KeywordsCollaborative governance
Institutions
Robustness
Rural revitalization
social-ecological systems
Issue Date3-Jun-2023
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Journal of Rural Studies, 2023, v. 101 How to Cite?
Abstract

Collaborative governance has the potential to foster co-creative solutions to rural issues. Many rural areas have deteriorated due to rapid and encroaching urbanization and globalization. By building institutions to support and convey collaborative governance processes, rural areas can be revitalized and equipped with the ability to cope and evolve in the face of unexpected shocks and disturbances, they can be made robust. Concepts and arguments developed in a social-ecological systems framework are drawn on to flesh out a theoretical logic to aid understandings of how institutional design can enhance the robustness of a rural social-ecological system through fostering collaboration. A critical instance case study of a rural revitalization project undertaken at a traditional village in Hong Kong, Lai Chi Wo, allows for in-depth analysis of the relationship between intuitional design, collaborative governance and robustness. Through this case study, we show how institutions can be designed and built to foster collaborative processes and, hence, enhance the system's robustness. The demonstration of this logic extends theoretical understandings regarding the identification of mechanisms through which institutional variables can impact and condition collaborative processes and so outcomes. While demonstrated here in the case of rural revitalization, these findings contribute to wider understandings of how collaborative endeavors can be fostered and enhanced and how robustness in social-ecological systems can be better supported.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/340200
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.542
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChu, V-
dc.contributor.authorLam, W-
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, J-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:42:25Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:42:25Z-
dc.date.issued2023-06-03-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Rural Studies, 2023, v. 101-
dc.identifier.issn0743-0167-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/340200-
dc.description.abstract<p><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/collaborative-governance" title="Learn more about Collaborative governance from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages">Collaborative governance</a> has the potential to foster co-creative solutions to rural issues. Many rural areas have deteriorated due to rapid and encroaching urbanization and globalization. By building institutions to support and convey collaborative governance processes, rural areas can be revitalized and equipped with the ability to cope and evolve in the face of unexpected shocks and disturbances, they can be made robust. Concepts and arguments developed in a social-ecological systems framework are drawn on to flesh out a theoretical logic to aid understandings of how institutional design can enhance the robustness of a rural social-ecological system through fostering collaboration. A critical instance case study of a rural <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/revitalization" title="Learn more about revitalization from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages">revitalization</a> project undertaken at a traditional village in Hong Kong, Lai Chi Wo, allows for in-depth analysis of the relationship between intuitional design, collaborative governance and robustness. Through this case study, we show how institutions can be designed and built to foster collaborative processes and, hence, enhance the system's robustness. The demonstration of this logic extends theoretical understandings regarding the identification of mechanisms through which institutional variables can impact and condition collaborative processes and so outcomes. While demonstrated here in the case of rural <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/revitalization" title="Learn more about revitalization from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages">revitalization</a>, these findings contribute to wider understandings of how collaborative endeavors can be fostered and enhanced and how robustness in social-ecological systems can be better supported.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Rural Studies-
dc.subjectCollaborative governance-
dc.subjectInstitutions-
dc.subjectRobustness-
dc.subjectRural revitalization-
dc.subjectsocial-ecological systems-
dc.titleBuilding robustness for rural revitalization: A social-ecological system perspective-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103042-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85160721511-
dc.identifier.volume101-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-1392-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001016198600001-
dc.identifier.issnl0743-0167-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats