File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Clinical performance of implant-supported single hybrid abutment crown restoration: A systematic review and meta-analysis

TitleClinical performance of implant-supported single hybrid abutment crown restoration: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
KeywordsHybrid abutment crown
Implant-supported crown
Survival
Systematic review
Technical
Issue Date13-Jun-2023
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 2023, v. 68, n. 1, p. 63-77 How to Cite?
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate survival rates and technical and biological complications of one-piece screw-retained hybrid abutments in implant-supported single crowns (SCs).

Study Selection: An electronic search was performed on five databases for clinical studies involving implant-supported single hybrid abutment crowns constructed using titanium-base (Ti base) abutments, with at least 12 months of follow-up. The RoB 2, Robins-I, and JBI tools were used to assess the risk of bias for the different study types. Success, survival, and complication rates were calculated, and a meta-analysis was performed to obtain a pooled estimate. Peri-implant health parameters were extracted and analyzed.

Results: 22 records (20 studies) were included in this analysis. Direct comparisons between screw-retained hybrid abutment SCs and cemented SCs showed no significant differences in the 1-year survival and success rates. For SCs using a hybrid abutment crown design, their 1-year survival rate was 100% (95% CI: 100%-100%, I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.984), and a success rate of 99% (95% CI: 97%-100%, I2 = 50.3%, P = 0.023) was calculated. No confounding variables significantly affected the estimates. The individual technical complication rate was low at 1-year follow-up. The estimated incidence of all types of complications in hybrid abutment SCs is less than 1%.

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, implant-supported SCs using a hybrid abutment crown design showed favorable short-term clinical outcomes. Additional well-designed clinical trials with at least a 5-year observation period are required to confirm their long-term clinical performance.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/340840
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.135
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang, MZ-
dc.contributor.authorHo, DKL-
dc.contributor.authorPelekos, G-
dc.contributor.authorFok, MR-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:47:41Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:47:41Z-
dc.date.issued2023-06-13-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Prosthodontic Research, 2023, v. 68, n. 1, p. 63-77-
dc.identifier.issn1883-1958-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/340840-
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Purpose:</strong> To investigate survival rates and technical and biological complications of one-piece screw-retained hybrid abutments in implant-supported single crowns (SCs).</p><p><strong>Study Selection:</strong> An electronic search was performed on five databases for clinical studies involving implant-supported single hybrid abutment crowns constructed using titanium-base (Ti base) abutments, with at least 12 months of follow-up. The RoB 2, Robins-I, and JBI tools were used to assess the risk of bias for the different study types. Success, survival, and complication rates were calculated, and a meta-analysis was performed to obtain a pooled estimate. Peri-implant health parameters were extracted and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> 22 records (20 studies) were included in this analysis. Direct comparisons between screw-retained hybrid abutment SCs and cemented SCs showed no significant differences in the 1-year survival and success rates. For SCs using a hybrid abutment crown design, their 1-year survival rate was 100% (95% CI: 100%-100%, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.984), and a success rate of 99% (95% CI: 97%-100%, I<sup>2</sup> = 50.3%, <em>P</em> = 0.023) was calculated. No confounding variables significantly affected the estimates. The individual technical complication rate was low at 1-year follow-up. The estimated incidence of all types of complications in hybrid abutment SCs is less than 1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Within the limitations of this study, implant-supported SCs using a hybrid abutment crown design showed favorable short-term clinical outcomes. Additional well-designed clinical trials with at least a 5-year observation period are required to confirm their long-term clinical performance.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthodontic Research-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectHybrid abutment crown-
dc.subjectImplant-supported crown-
dc.subjectSurvival-
dc.subjectSystematic review-
dc.subjectTechnical-
dc.titleClinical performance of implant-supported single hybrid abutment crown restoration: A systematic review and meta-analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_22_00279-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85182954675-
dc.identifier.volume68-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage63-
dc.identifier.epage77-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001011988100001-
dc.identifier.issnl1883-1958-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats