File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_22_00279
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85182954675
- WOS: WOS:001011988100001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Clinical performance of implant-supported single hybrid abutment crown restoration: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Title | Clinical performance of implant-supported single hybrid abutment crown restoration: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Hybrid abutment crown Implant-supported crown Survival Systematic review Technical |
Issue Date | 13-Jun-2023 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Citation | Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 2023, v. 68, n. 1, p. 63-77 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Purpose: To investigate survival rates and technical and biological complications of one-piece screw-retained hybrid abutments in implant-supported single crowns (SCs). Study Selection: An electronic search was performed on five databases for clinical studies involving implant-supported single hybrid abutment crowns constructed using titanium-base (Ti base) abutments, with at least 12 months of follow-up. The RoB 2, Robins-I, and JBI tools were used to assess the risk of bias for the different study types. Success, survival, and complication rates were calculated, and a meta-analysis was performed to obtain a pooled estimate. Peri-implant health parameters were extracted and analyzed. Results: 22 records (20 studies) were included in this analysis. Direct comparisons between screw-retained hybrid abutment SCs and cemented SCs showed no significant differences in the 1-year survival and success rates. For SCs using a hybrid abutment crown design, their 1-year survival rate was 100% (95% CI: 100%-100%, I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.984), and a success rate of 99% (95% CI: 97%-100%, I2 = 50.3%, P = 0.023) was calculated. No confounding variables significantly affected the estimates. The individual technical complication rate was low at 1-year follow-up. The estimated incidence of all types of complications in hybrid abutment SCs is less than 1%. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, implant-supported SCs using a hybrid abutment crown design showed favorable short-term clinical outcomes. Additional well-designed clinical trials with at least a 5-year observation period are required to confirm their long-term clinical performance. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/340840 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.135 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, MZ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, DKL | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pelekos, G | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fok, MR | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-11T10:47:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-11T10:47:41Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-06-13 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 2023, v. 68, n. 1, p. 63-77 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1883-1958 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/340840 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p><strong>Purpose:</strong> To investigate survival rates and technical and biological complications of one-piece screw-retained hybrid abutments in implant-supported single crowns (SCs).</p><p><strong>Study Selection:</strong> An electronic search was performed on five databases for clinical studies involving implant-supported single hybrid abutment crowns constructed using titanium-base (Ti base) abutments, with at least 12 months of follow-up. The RoB 2, Robins-I, and JBI tools were used to assess the risk of bias for the different study types. Success, survival, and complication rates were calculated, and a meta-analysis was performed to obtain a pooled estimate. Peri-implant health parameters were extracted and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> 22 records (20 studies) were included in this analysis. Direct comparisons between screw-retained hybrid abutment SCs and cemented SCs showed no significant differences in the 1-year survival and success rates. For SCs using a hybrid abutment crown design, their 1-year survival rate was 100% (95% CI: 100%-100%, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.984), and a success rate of 99% (95% CI: 97%-100%, I<sup>2</sup> = 50.3%, <em>P</em> = 0.023) was calculated. No confounding variables significantly affected the estimates. The individual technical complication rate was low at 1-year follow-up. The estimated incidence of all types of complications in hybrid abutment SCs is less than 1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Within the limitations of this study, implant-supported SCs using a hybrid abutment crown design showed favorable short-term clinical outcomes. Additional well-designed clinical trials with at least a 5-year observation period are required to confirm their long-term clinical performance.</p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Prosthodontic Research | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | Hybrid abutment crown | - |
dc.subject | Implant-supported crown | - |
dc.subject | Survival | - |
dc.subject | Systematic review | - |
dc.subject | Technical | - |
dc.title | Clinical performance of implant-supported single hybrid abutment crown restoration: A systematic review and meta-analysis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_22_00279 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85182954675 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 68 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 63 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 77 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:001011988100001 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1883-1958 | - |