File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1275
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Book Chapter: LGBT Movements in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China
Title | LGBT Movements in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 27-Jul-2021 |
Abstract | Although Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China broadly share common social and cultural norms rooted in Confucian values and culturally Chinese family ideals, they have developed distinct political and economic trajectories since 1949 that have created very different possibilities for LGBT movements. Coming from the conservative political, social, and moral milieu of the 1950s through the 1970s, in the 1980s and 1990s, these societies witnessed a blooming of sexually alternative, even queer, cultural productions, commercial venues, and political activism, together with distinctive “gay,” “lesbian,” or tongzhi identities, among other self-identification labels. By the late 20th century, flows of people, ideas, concepts, and relationships had grown increasingly salient for emerging terms of identification and modes of organizing in all three societies. The diverse combinations of democracy, socialism, authoritarianism, and postcolonialism have shaped the content and direction of sexuality-based identities and sexual rights movements in these three societies. How explicitly these communities pursued visibility and claimed sexually specific identities, however, varied significantly both internally and in comparison across the three societies. The shared histories have created significant commonalities across the region; yet the different degrees of physical and societal openness and the extent of access to domestic and foreign interlocutors in these three societies have produced striking differences in LGBT citizens’ ability to claim diverse rights and protections under multifaceted forms of sexual citizenship. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/340896 |
ISBN |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kong, Travis Shiu-ki | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kuan, Hsiao-wei | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lau, Sky Hoi-leung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Friedman, Sara L | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-11T10:48:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-11T10:48:06Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-07-27 | - |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9780190677923 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/340896 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>Although Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China broadly share common social and cultural norms rooted in Confucian values and culturally Chinese family ideals, they have developed distinct political and economic trajectories since 1949 that have created very different possibilities for LGBT movements. Coming from the conservative political, social, and moral milieu of the 1950s through the 1970s, in the 1980s and 1990s, these societies witnessed a blooming of sexually alternative, even queer, cultural productions, commercial venues, and political activism, together with distinctive “gay,” “lesbian,” or <em>tongzhi</em> identities, among other self-identification labels. By the late 20th century, flows of people, ideas, concepts, and relationships had grown increasingly salient for emerging terms of identification and modes of organizing in all three societies. The diverse combinations of democracy, socialism, authoritarianism, and postcolonialism have shaped the content and direction of sexuality-based identities and sexual rights movements in these three societies. How explicitly these communities pursued visibility and claimed sexually specific identities, however, varied significantly both internally and in comparison across the three societies. The shared histories have created significant commonalities across the region; yet the different degrees of physical and societal openness and the extent of access to domestic and foreign interlocutors in these three societies have produced striking differences in LGBT citizens’ ability to claim diverse rights and protections under multifaceted forms of sexual citizenship.<br></p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Oxford Encyclopedia of LGBT Politics and Policy | - |
dc.title | LGBT Movements in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China | - |
dc.type | Book_Chapter | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1275 | - |