File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107024
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85149734053
- WOS: WOS:000929767100001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: New unsaturated erosion model for landslide: Effects of flow particle size and debunking the importance of frictional stress
| Title | New unsaturated erosion model for landslide: Effects of flow particle size and debunking the importance of frictional stress |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Landslides Physical modelling Soil bed erosion Unsaturated soil |
| Issue Date | 20-Mar-2023 |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Citation | Engineering Geology, 2023, v. 315 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Flow-type landslides, such as debris flows and rock avalanches, erode soil bed material as they flow downslope. The eroded material increases the volume of a landslide, and thus, its destructive potential. Field reports of debris flow show that collisional stresses generally occur at the flow front while frictional stresses generally occur at the base of the flow body. However, it remains unclear which of these competing effects is more dominant in terms of soil bed erosion. Moreover, existing theories do not consider the flow basal slip condition on the erosion dynamics at the flow-bed interface, nor do they consider the effects of volumetric response on the shear strength of unsaturated soil beds. In this study, an erosion model that considers the effects of basal slip condition and the volumetric response of unsaturated soil beds is proposed and evaluated with a unique set of experiments. Boundary collisional stresses drive soil bed erosion, while boundary frictional shear stresses are counteracted by the soil strength mobilized by overburden induced by volume contraction. The flow particle size and Froude number are shown to be adequate indicators of the boundary collisional stresses that govern the soil bed erosion rate. Findings from this study hint at the conjecture that existing erosion models may not be equipped with the necessary physics to provide realistic hazard assessments of flow-type landslides eroding soil beds. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/341708 |
| ISSN | 2021 Impact Factor: 6.902 2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.441 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Choi, CE | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Song, P | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-20T06:58:28Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-03-20T06:58:28Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-03-20 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Engineering Geology, 2023, v. 315 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0013-7952 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/341708 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | <p>Flow-type landslides, such as debris flows and <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/rock-avalanche" title="Learn more about rock avalanches from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages">rock avalanches</a>, erode soil bed material as they flow downslope. The eroded material increases the volume of a landslide, and thus, its destructive potential. Field reports of debris flow show that collisional stresses generally occur at the flow front while frictional stresses generally occur at the base of the flow body. However, it remains unclear which of these competing effects is more dominant in terms of soil bed erosion. Moreover, existing theories do not consider the <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/basal-flow" title="Learn more about flow basal from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages">flow basal</a> slip condition on the erosion dynamics at the flow-bed interface, nor do they consider the effects of volumetric response on the shear strength of <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/unsaturated-soil" title="Learn more about unsaturated soil from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages">unsaturated soil</a> beds. In this study, an erosion model that considers the effects of basal slip condition and the volumetric response of <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/unsaturated-soil" title="Learn more about unsaturated soil from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages">unsaturated soil</a> beds is proposed and evaluated with a unique set of experiments. Boundary collisional stresses drive soil bed erosion, while boundary frictional shear stresses are counteracted by the soil strength mobilized by overburden induced by volume contraction. The flow particle size and <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/froude-number" title="Learn more about Froude number from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages">Froude number</a> are shown to be adequate indicators of the boundary collisional stresses that govern the soil bed <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/erosion-rate" title="Learn more about erosion rate from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages">erosion rate</a>. Findings from this study hint at the conjecture that existing erosion models may not be equipped with the necessary physics to provide realistic hazard assessments of flow-type landslides eroding soil beds.</p> | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Engineering Geology | - |
| dc.subject | Landslides | - |
| dc.subject | Physical modelling | - |
| dc.subject | Soil bed erosion | - |
| dc.subject | Unsaturated soil | - |
| dc.title | New unsaturated erosion model for landslide: Effects of flow particle size and debunking the importance of frictional stress | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107024 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85149734053 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 315 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1872-6917 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000929767100001 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 0013-7952 | - |