File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for pulmonary valve intervention after tetralogy of Fallot repair: A nationwide cohort study

TitleAdherence to clinical practice guidelines for pulmonary valve intervention after tetralogy of Fallot repair: A nationwide cohort study
Authors
Keywordscardiac MRI
guidelines
pulmonary valve replacement
tetralogy of Fallot
Issue Date1-Feb-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
JTCVS Open, 2024, v. 17, p. 215-228 How to Cite?
Abstract

Objectives To determine guideline adherence pertaining to pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) referral after tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair. Methods Children and adults with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging scans and at least moderate pulmonary regurgitation were prospectively enrolled in the Comprehensive Outcomes Registry Late After TOF Repair (CORRELATE). Individuals with previous PVR were excluded. Patients were classified according to presence (+) versus absence (−) of PVR and presence (+) versus absence (−) of contemporaneous guideline satisfaction. A validated score (specific activity scale [SAS]) classified adult symptom status. Results In total, 498 participants (57% male, mean age 32 ± 14 years) were enrolled from 14 Canadian centers (2013-2020). Mean follow-up was 3.8 ± 1.8 years. Guideline criteria for PVR were satisfied for the majority (n = 422/498, 85%), although referral for PVR occurred only in a minority (n = 167/498, 34%). At PVR referral, most were asymptomatic (75% in SAS class 1). One participant (0.6%) received PVR without meeting criteria (PVR+/indication–). The remainder (n = 75/498, 15%) did not meet criteria for and did not receive PVR (PVR–/indication–). Abnormal cardiovascular imaging was the most commonly cited indication for PVR (n = 61/123, 50%). The SAS class and ratio of right to left end-diastolic volumes were independent predictors of PVR in a multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 3.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.92-5.8, P < .0001; hazard ratio, 2.78; 95% confidence interval, 2.18-3.55, P < .0001). Conclusions Although a majority of patients met guideline criteria for PVR, only a minority were referred for intervention. Abnormal cardiovascular imaging was the most common indication for referral. Further research will be necessary to establish the longer-term clinical impact of varying PVR referral strategies.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/341726

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMassarella, Danielle-
dc.contributor.authorMcCrindle, Brian W-
dc.contributor.authorRuneckles, Kyle-
dc.contributor.authorFan, Steve-
dc.contributor.authorDahdah, Nagib-
dc.contributor.authorDallaire, Frédéric-
dc.contributor.authorDrolet, Christian-
dc.contributor.authorGrewal, Jasmine-
dc.contributor.authorHancock-Friesen, Camille L-
dc.contributor.authorHickey, Edward-
dc.contributor.authorKarur, Gauri Rani-
dc.contributor.authorKhairy, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorLeonardi, Benedetta-
dc.contributor.authorKeir, Michelle-
dc.contributor.authorNadeem, Syed Najaf-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Ming-Yen-
dc.contributor.authorShah, Ashish-
dc.contributor.authorTham, Edythe B-
dc.contributor.authorTherrien, Judith-
dc.contributor.authorWarren, Andrew E-
dc.contributor.authorVonder Muhll, Isabelle F-
dc.contributor.authorVan de Bruane, Alexander-
dc.contributor.authorYamamura, Kenichiro-
dc.contributor.authorFarkouh, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorWald, Rachel M-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-20T06:58:35Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-20T06:58:35Z-
dc.date.issued2024-02-01-
dc.identifier.citationJTCVS Open, 2024, v. 17, p. 215-228-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/341726-
dc.description.abstract<p>Objectives To determine guideline adherence pertaining to pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) referral after tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair. Methods Children and adults with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging scans and at least moderate pulmonary regurgitation were prospectively enrolled in the Comprehensive Outcomes Registry Late After TOF Repair (CORRELATE). Individuals with previous PVR were excluded. Patients were classified according to presence (+) versus absence (−) of PVR and presence (+) versus absence (−) of contemporaneous guideline satisfaction. A validated score (specific activity scale [SAS]) classified adult symptom status. Results In total, 498 participants (57% male, mean age 32 ± 14 years) were enrolled from 14 Canadian centers (2013-2020). Mean follow-up was 3.8 ± 1.8 years. Guideline criteria for PVR were satisfied for the majority (n = 422/498, 85%), although referral for PVR occurred only in a minority (n = 167/498, 34%). At PVR referral, most were asymptomatic (75% in SAS class 1). One participant (0.6%) received PVR without meeting criteria (PVR+/indication–). The remainder (n = 75/498, 15%) did not meet criteria for and did not receive PVR (PVR–/indication–). Abnormal cardiovascular imaging was the most commonly cited indication for PVR (n = 61/123, 50%). The SAS class and ratio of right to left end-diastolic volumes were independent predictors of PVR in a multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 3.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.92-5.8, P < .0001; hazard ratio, 2.78; 95% confidence interval, 2.18-3.55, P < .0001). Conclusions Although a majority of patients met guideline criteria for PVR, only a minority were referred for intervention. Abnormal cardiovascular imaging was the most common indication for referral. Further research will be necessary to establish the longer-term clinical impact of varying PVR referral strategies.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofJTCVS Open-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectcardiac MRI-
dc.subjectguidelines-
dc.subjectpulmonary valve replacement-
dc.subjecttetralogy of Fallot-
dc.titleAdherence to clinical practice guidelines for pulmonary valve intervention after tetralogy of Fallot repair: A nationwide cohort study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.xjon.2023.11.013-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85181835274-
dc.identifier.volume17-
dc.identifier.spage215-
dc.identifier.epage228-
dc.identifier.eissn2666-2736-
dc.identifier.issnl2666-2736-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats