File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Assessing student learning in work-integrated learning (WIL): A systematic review on assessment methods and purposes

TitleAssessing student learning in work-integrated learning (WIL): A systematic review on assessment methods and purposes
Authors
KeywordsAssessment
Higher education
Lifelong learning
Self-regulated learning
Work-integrated learning
Issue Date26-Feb-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2024, v. 81 How to Cite?
Abstract

Under increasing pressure from quality assurance and other accountability concerns, it is easy to fall into the trap of assessing students only for the sake of assessment. This review aims to help educators rethink assessment in work-integrated learning (WIL) courses with purpose in mind by identifying the assessment methods used to assess student learning in such courses over the last 20 years, together with the underlying purposes of assessment. Based on the analysis of 103 selected articles from four databases and additional searching, 22 assessment methods and seven broad categories of assessment purposes were identified. One key finding is that the assessment of student learning in WIL courses outlined in the results was mainly implemented as assessment for learning to support students’ development as self-regulated, lifelong learners. Based on this finding, we propose three assessment design principles for self-regulated learning with recommendations on how to utilize different assessment methods to their fullest potential in preparing students for their futures.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/341731
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.084

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLuk, Lillian Yun Yung-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Cecilia KY-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-20T06:58:37Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-20T06:58:37Z-
dc.date.issued2024-02-26-
dc.identifier.citationStudies in Educational Evaluation, 2024, v. 81-
dc.identifier.issn0191-491X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/341731-
dc.description.abstract<p>Under increasing pressure from quality assurance and other accountability concerns, it is easy to fall into the trap of assessing students only for the sake of assessment. This review aims to help educators rethink assessment in work-integrated learning (WIL) courses with purpose in mind by identifying the assessment methods used to assess student learning in such courses over the last 20 years, together with the underlying purposes of assessment. Based on the analysis of 103 selected articles from four databases and additional searching, 22 assessment methods and seven broad categories of assessment purposes were identified. One key finding is that the assessment of student learning in WIL courses outlined in the results was mainly implemented as assessment for learning to support students’ development as self-regulated, lifelong learners. Based on this finding, we propose three assessment design principles for self-regulated learning with recommendations on how to utilize different assessment methods to their fullest potential in preparing students for their futures.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofStudies in Educational Evaluation-
dc.subjectAssessment-
dc.subjectHigher education-
dc.subjectLifelong learning-
dc.subjectSelf-regulated learning-
dc.subjectWork-integrated learning-
dc.titleAssessing student learning in work-integrated learning (WIL): A systematic review on assessment methods and purposes-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101345-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85186531420-
dc.identifier.volume81-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-2529-
dc.identifier.issnl0191-491X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats