File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s00520-024-08402-9
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85186840552
- WOS: WOS:001176465900001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Prevalence and assessment tools of cancer-related cognitive impairment in lung cancer survivors: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis
Title | Prevalence and assessment tools of cancer-related cognitive impairment in lung cancer survivors: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Cancer nursing Cancer-related cognitive impairment Meta-analysis Prevalence |
Issue Date | 5-Mar-2024 |
Publisher | Springer |
Citation | Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024, v. 32, n. 4 How to Cite? |
Abstract | PurposeCancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a significant risk factor influencing the quality of life in lung cancer survivors. No absolute assessment tool has been confirmed to assess CRCI in lung cancer survivors. This review was undertaken to pool the overall prevalence of CRCI and to summarize the assessment tools in assessing CRCI among lung cancer survivors. MethodsPubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, and CNKI were searched to retrieve articles reported CRCI prevalence. Summary prevalence estimates were pooled using a random effects model, along with corresponding 95% prediction intervals (PIs). The Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation of proportions was incorporated in the analysis. Additionally, subgroup analysis, meta-regression, and leave-one-out analysis were performed. ResultsA total of 12 studies, involving 1934 survivors, were included in the review. All of these studies were found to have a low risk of bias in terms of their methodological quality. Four studies (33.3%) utilized the International Cognition and Cancer Task Force (ICCTF) criteria to identify CRCI through neuropsychological tests. The pooled prevalence rate of CRCI was found to be 26% (95% PI, 16–37%), I2 = 95.97%. The region in which the studies were conducted was identified as a significant factor contributing to this heterogeneity (p = 0.013). No indication of small-study effects was found (Egger’s test: p = 0.9191). ConclusionThis review provides an overview of CRCI prevalence and assessment tools in lung cancer survivors. The findings can serve as epidemiological evidence to enhance clinicians’ and researchers’ understanding of early detection and assessment. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/341736 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.007 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ho, Mu-Hsing | - |
dc.contributor.author | So, Tsz Wei | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fan, Chun Lun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chung, Yiu Tak | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lin, Chia-Chin | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-20T06:58:39Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-20T06:58:39Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-03-05 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024, v. 32, n. 4 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0941-4355 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/341736 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <h3>Purpose</h3><p>Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a significant risk factor influencing the quality of life in lung cancer survivors. No absolute assessment tool has been confirmed to assess CRCI in lung cancer survivors. This review was undertaken to pool the overall prevalence of CRCI and to summarize the assessment tools in assessing CRCI among lung cancer survivors.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, and CNKI were searched to retrieve articles reported CRCI prevalence. Summary prevalence estimates were pooled using a random effects model, along with corresponding 95% prediction intervals (PIs). The Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation of proportions was incorporated in the analysis. Additionally, subgroup analysis, meta-regression, and leave-one-out analysis were performed.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 12 studies, involving 1934 survivors, were included in the review. All of these studies were found to have a low risk of bias in terms of their methodological quality. Four studies (33.3%) utilized the International Cognition and Cancer Task Force (ICCTF) criteria to identify CRCI through neuropsychological tests. The pooled prevalence rate of CRCI was found to be 26% (95% PI, 16–37%), <em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 95.97%. The region in which the studies were conducted was identified as a significant factor contributing to this heterogeneity (<em>p</em> = 0.013). No indication of small-study effects was found (Egger’s test: <em>p</em> = 0.9191).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This review provides an overview of CRCI prevalence and assessment tools in lung cancer survivors. The findings can serve as epidemiological evidence to enhance clinicians’ and researchers’ understanding of early detection and assessment.</p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Springer | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Supportive Care in Cancer | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | Cancer nursing | - |
dc.subject | Cancer-related cognitive impairment | - |
dc.subject | Meta-analysis | - |
dc.subject | Prevalence | - |
dc.title | Prevalence and assessment tools of cancer-related cognitive impairment in lung cancer survivors: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00520-024-08402-9 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85186840552 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 32 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1433-7339 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:001176465900001 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0941-4355 | - |