File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.07.041
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85051120305
- PMID: 30100397
- WOS: WOS:000445436400026
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Clinical prediction of HBV and HCV related hepatic fibrosis using machine learning
Title | Clinical prediction of HBV and HCV related hepatic fibrosis using machine learning |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | FIB-4 Gradient boosting Hepatic fibrosis Hepatitis B Hepatitis C Machine learning |
Issue Date | 2018 |
Citation | EBioMedicine, 2018, v. 35, p. 124-132 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Clinical prediction of advanced hepatic fibrosis (HF) and cirrhosis has long been challenging due to the gold standard, liver biopsy, being an invasive approach with certain limitations. Less invasive blood test tandem with a cutting-edge machine learning algorithm shows promising diagnostic potential. In this study, we constructed and compared machine learning methods with the FIB-4 score in a discovery dataset (n = 490) of hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients. Models were validated in an independent HBV dataset (n = 86). We further employed these models on two independent hepatitis C virus (HCV) datasets (n = 254 and 230) to examine their applicability. In the discovery data, gradient boosting (GB) stably outperformed other methods as well as FIB-4 scores (p <.001) in the prediction of advanced HF and cirrhosis. In the HBV validation dataset, for classification between early and advanced HF, the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) of GB model was 0.918, while FIB-4 was 0.841; for classification between non-cirrhosis and cirrhosis, GB showed AUROC of 0.871, while FIB-4 was 0.830. Additionally, GB-based prediction demonstrated good classification capacity on two HCV datasets while higher cutoffs for both GB and FIB-4 scores were required to achieve comparable specificity and sensitivity. Using the same parameters as FIB-4, the GB-based prediction system demonstrated steady improvements relative to FIB-4 in HBV and HCV cohorts with different cutoff values required in different etiological groups. A user-friendly web tool, LiveBoost, makes our prediction models freely accessible for further clinical studies and applications. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/342573 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wei, Runmin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Jingye | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Xiaoning | - |
dc.contributor.author | Xie, Guoxiang | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Yixing | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Hua | - |
dc.contributor.author | Peng, Cheng Yuan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Rajani, Cynthia | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kwee, Sandi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Liu, Ping | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jia, Wei | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-17T07:04:45Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-04-17T07:04:45Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | EBioMedicine, 2018, v. 35, p. 124-132 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/342573 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Clinical prediction of advanced hepatic fibrosis (HF) and cirrhosis has long been challenging due to the gold standard, liver biopsy, being an invasive approach with certain limitations. Less invasive blood test tandem with a cutting-edge machine learning algorithm shows promising diagnostic potential. In this study, we constructed and compared machine learning methods with the FIB-4 score in a discovery dataset (n = 490) of hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients. Models were validated in an independent HBV dataset (n = 86). We further employed these models on two independent hepatitis C virus (HCV) datasets (n = 254 and 230) to examine their applicability. In the discovery data, gradient boosting (GB) stably outperformed other methods as well as FIB-4 scores (p <.001) in the prediction of advanced HF and cirrhosis. In the HBV validation dataset, for classification between early and advanced HF, the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) of GB model was 0.918, while FIB-4 was 0.841; for classification between non-cirrhosis and cirrhosis, GB showed AUROC of 0.871, while FIB-4 was 0.830. Additionally, GB-based prediction demonstrated good classification capacity on two HCV datasets while higher cutoffs for both GB and FIB-4 scores were required to achieve comparable specificity and sensitivity. Using the same parameters as FIB-4, the GB-based prediction system demonstrated steady improvements relative to FIB-4 in HBV and HCV cohorts with different cutoff values required in different etiological groups. A user-friendly web tool, LiveBoost, makes our prediction models freely accessible for further clinical studies and applications. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | EBioMedicine | - |
dc.subject | FIB-4 | - |
dc.subject | Gradient boosting | - |
dc.subject | Hepatic fibrosis | - |
dc.subject | Hepatitis B | - |
dc.subject | Hepatitis C | - |
dc.subject | Machine learning | - |
dc.title | Clinical prediction of HBV and HCV related hepatic fibrosis using machine learning | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.07.041 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 30100397 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85051120305 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 35 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 124 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 132 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2352-3964 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000445436400026 | - |