File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Predictors of an informative or actionable cytological diagnosis on repeat breast aspiration after an insufficient aspirate: A multicentre retrospective review

TitlePredictors of an informative or actionable cytological diagnosis on repeat breast aspiration after an insufficient aspirate: A multicentre retrospective review
Authors
KeywordsBREAST
Cytological Techniques
DIAGNOSIS
Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
Issue Date2024
Citation
Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2024, article no. jcp-2023-209250 How to Cite?
AbstractAn insufficient/inadequate diagnosis on fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of the breast is not an uncommon diagnostic dilemma. This study aims to review the rate and clinical features predicting an informative or actionable diagnosis on repeating breast aspiration after an insufficient aspirate. Methods: Unsatisfactory/insufficient/inadequate or equivalent breast aspirates were retrieved from the involved institutions, and those with a repeat aspiration performed within 365 days were included. Clinical and radiological information were retrieved. Available cytological slides were reviewed. Results: Totally 539 paired aspirates were retrieved, with 61.2% (n=330/539) and 10.9% (n=59/539) cytological diagnosis being informative (not insufficient) and actionable (not insufficient nor benign) on repeat aspiration. Younger age (p=0.005) was associated with an informative diagnosis and prior radiotherapy (p=0.097) and insufficient aspirates performed under free-hand (p=0.097) trended with an actionable diagnosis. Radiological findings of calcification (p=0.026) and hyperechogenicity (p=0.045), a small lesion size on initial (p=0.037) and repeat (p=0.059) radiological assessment and interval size increment (p=0.019) correlated with informative/actionable diagnoses. Cytomorphological parameters, except for a trend with crushing artefact (p=0.063), do not correlate with the cytologic diagnosis of the repeat aspirate. Conclusions: Repeating breast FNAC on patients after an insufficient diagnosis yields an informative ( € sufficient') result in over 60% of cases. Small lesions with calcification, hyperechogenicity and/or interval size increment are more likely to yield diagnostic results on repeat aspiration and indicate select patients suitable for repeat FNAC over more invasive procedures. The lack of associations with cytomorphological parameters cautions against overinterpretation of insufficient breast aspirates.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/343452
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.934

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, Joshua-
dc.contributor.authorLai, Billy S.W.-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Joanna K.M.-
dc.contributor.authorTsang, Julia Y.S.-
dc.contributor.authorTse, Gary M.K.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-10T09:08:15Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-10T09:08:15Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Pathology, 2024, article no. jcp-2023-209250-
dc.identifier.issn0021-9746-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/343452-
dc.description.abstractAn insufficient/inadequate diagnosis on fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of the breast is not an uncommon diagnostic dilemma. This study aims to review the rate and clinical features predicting an informative or actionable diagnosis on repeating breast aspiration after an insufficient aspirate. Methods: Unsatisfactory/insufficient/inadequate or equivalent breast aspirates were retrieved from the involved institutions, and those with a repeat aspiration performed within 365 days were included. Clinical and radiological information were retrieved. Available cytological slides were reviewed. Results: Totally 539 paired aspirates were retrieved, with 61.2% (n=330/539) and 10.9% (n=59/539) cytological diagnosis being informative (not insufficient) and actionable (not insufficient nor benign) on repeat aspiration. Younger age (p=0.005) was associated with an informative diagnosis and prior radiotherapy (p=0.097) and insufficient aspirates performed under free-hand (p=0.097) trended with an actionable diagnosis. Radiological findings of calcification (p=0.026) and hyperechogenicity (p=0.045), a small lesion size on initial (p=0.037) and repeat (p=0.059) radiological assessment and interval size increment (p=0.019) correlated with informative/actionable diagnoses. Cytomorphological parameters, except for a trend with crushing artefact (p=0.063), do not correlate with the cytologic diagnosis of the repeat aspirate. Conclusions: Repeating breast FNAC on patients after an insufficient diagnosis yields an informative ( € sufficient') result in over 60% of cases. Small lesions with calcification, hyperechogenicity and/or interval size increment are more likely to yield diagnostic results on repeat aspiration and indicate select patients suitable for repeat FNAC over more invasive procedures. The lack of associations with cytomorphological parameters cautions against overinterpretation of insufficient breast aspirates.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Pathology-
dc.subjectBREAST-
dc.subjectCytological Techniques-
dc.subjectDIAGNOSIS-
dc.subjectDiagnostic Techniques and Procedures-
dc.titlePredictors of an informative or actionable cytological diagnosis on repeat breast aspiration after an insufficient aspirate: A multicentre retrospective review-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/jcp-2023-209250-
dc.identifier.pmid38191269-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85183436031-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. jcp-2023-209250-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. jcp-2023-209250-
dc.identifier.eissn1472-4146-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats