File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Real-World Practice of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Patients With Invasive Breast Cancer

TitleReal-World Practice of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Patients With Invasive Breast Cancer
Authors
Keywordsbreast cancer
conventionally fractionated radiotherapy
hypofractionated radiotherapy
molecular subtype
real-world practice
Issue Date3-Feb-2022
PublisherFrontiers Media
Citation
Frontiers in Oncology, 2022, v. 12 How to Cite?
Abstract

Purpose: Application of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) is growing in patients with breast cancer (BC). This study aimed to explore a real-world practice of HFRT in early and locally advanced BC.

Methods: Patients with invasive BC between 2015 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Radiotherapy (RT) was delivered by HFRT and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT). Locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated by Kaplan–Meier curve and compared by Log-rank test. The effect of treatment modality on DFS was estimated by univariate and multivariable analyses.

Results: A total of 1,010 patients were included in this study, and 903 (89.4%) were treated with HFRT. At a median follow-up of 49.5 months, there was no significant difference in a 4-year cumulative incidence of LRRFS in HFRT group (1.5%) and in CFRT group (3.8%) (p = 0.23), neither in different nodal stages nor in N2–3 patients with different molecular subtypes. The 4-year DFS was 93.5% in HFRT group compared with 89.9% in CFRT group with no significant difference either (p = 0.17). Univariate and multivariable analyses also showed no significant difference in DFS between HFRT and CFRT group. However, DFS of HFRT group tended to be lower in N2–3 patients with triple negative BC compared with that of CFRT group (76.2% versus 100%).

Conclusion: HFRT can achieve similar cumulative incidence of LRRFS and DFS in patients with BC after lumpectomy or mastectomy, and also in different nodal stage, and in locally advanced stage with different molecular subtypes.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/343817
ISSN
2022 Impact Factor: 4.7
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.834

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, Fang-
dc.contributor.authorHui, Timothy SK-
dc.contributor.authorMa, Lingyu-
dc.contributor.authorNong, Yaqing-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Ying-
dc.contributor.authorJing, Haiman-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Eric KW-
dc.contributor.authorXu, Zhiyuan-
dc.contributor.authorFu, Pingfu-
dc.contributor.authorChang, Amy Tien Yee-
dc.contributor.authorHsue, Victor-
dc.contributor.authorKong, Feng-Ming Spring-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-11T07:51:50Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-11T07:51:50Z-
dc.date.issued2022-02-03-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Oncology, 2022, v. 12-
dc.identifier.issn2234-943X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/343817-
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Purpose:</strong> Application of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) is growing in patients with breast cancer (BC). This study aimed to explore a real-world practice of HFRT in early and locally advanced BC.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> Patients with invasive BC between 2015 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Radiotherapy (RT) was delivered by HFRT and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT). Locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated by Kaplan–Meier curve and compared by Log-rank test. The effect of treatment modality on DFS was estimated by univariate and multivariable analyses.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> A total of 1,010 patients were included in this study, and 903 (89.4%) were treated with HFRT. At a median follow-up of 49.5 months, there was no significant difference in a 4-year cumulative incidence of LRRFS in HFRT group (1.5%) and in CFRT group (3.8%) (p = 0.23), neither in different nodal stages nor in N2–3 patients with different molecular subtypes. The 4-year DFS was 93.5% in HFRT group compared with 89.9% in CFRT group with no significant difference either (p = 0.17). Univariate and multivariable analyses also showed no significant difference in DFS between HFRT and CFRT group. However, DFS of HFRT group tended to be lower in N2–3 patients with triple negative BC compared with that of CFRT group (76.2% versus 100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> HFRT can achieve similar cumulative incidence of LRRFS and DFS in patients with BC after lumpectomy or mastectomy, and also in different nodal stage, and in locally advanced stage with different molecular subtypes.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherFrontiers Media-
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Oncology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectbreast cancer-
dc.subjectconventionally fractionated radiotherapy-
dc.subjecthypofractionated radiotherapy-
dc.subjectmolecular subtype-
dc.subjectreal-world practice-
dc.titleReal-World Practice of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Patients With Invasive Breast Cancer-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fonc.2022.811794-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85124991941-
dc.identifier.volume12-
dc.identifier.eissn2234-943X-
dc.identifier.issnl2234-943X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats