File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110023
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85178331755
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Dosimetric analysis of brachial plexopathy after stereotactic body radiotherapy: Significance of organ delineation
Title | Dosimetric analysis of brachial plexopathy after stereotactic body radiotherapy: Significance of organ delineation |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Brachial plexopathy Delineation Dosimetric analysis Stereotactic body radiotherapy |
Issue Date | 1-Jan-2024 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Citation | Radiotherapy & Oncology, 2024, v. 190 How to Cite? |
Abstract | ObjectivesExamine the significance of contouring the brachial plexus (BP) for toxicity estimation and select metrics for predicting radiation-induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP) after stereotactic body radiotherapy. Materials and MethodsPatients with planning target volume (PTV) ≤ 2 cm from the BP were eligible. The BP was contoured primarily according to the RTOG 1106 atlas, while subclavian-axillary veins (SAV) were contoured according to RTOG 0236. Apical PTVs were classified as anterior (PTV-A) or posterior (PTV-B) PTVs. Variables predicting grade 2 or higher RIBP (RIBP2) were selected through least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and logistic regression. ResultsAmong 137 patients with 140 BPs (median follow-up, 32.1 months), 11 experienced RIBP2. For patients with RIBP2, the maximum physical dose to the BP (BP-Dmax) was 46.5 Gy (median; range, 35.7 to 60.7 Gy). Of these patients, 54.5 % (6/11) satisfied the RTOG limits when using SAV delineation; among them, 83.3 % (5/6) had PTV-B. For patients with PTV-B, the maximum physical dose to SAV (SAV-Dmax) was 11.2 Gy (median) lower than BP-Dmax. Maximum and 0.3 cc biologically effective doses to the BP based on the linear-quadratic-linear model (BP-BEDmax LQL and BP-BED0.3cc LQL, α/β = 3) were selected as predictive variables with thresholds of 118 and 73 Gy, respectively. ConclusionContouring SAV may significantly underestimate the RIBP2 risk in dosimetry, especially for patients with PTV-B. BP contouring indicated BP-BED0.3cc LQL and BP-BEDmax LQL as potential predictors of RIBP2. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/343934 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.9 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.702 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Niu, Geng-Min | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gao, Miao-Miao | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Xiao-Feng | - |
dc.contributor.author | Dong, Yang | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Yi-Fan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Huan-Huan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Guan, Yong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng, Ze-Yuan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhao, Shu-Zhou | - |
dc.contributor.author | Song, Yong-Chun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tao, Zhen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhao, Lu-Jun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Meng, Mao-Bin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kong Feng-Ming Spring | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yuan, Zhi-Yong | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-18T03:42:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-18T03:42:56Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-01-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Radiotherapy & Oncology, 2024, v. 190 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0167-8140 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/343934 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <h3>Objectives</h3><p>Examine the significance of contouring the brachial plexus (BP) for toxicity estimation and select metrics for predicting radiation-induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP) after stereotactic body radiotherapy.</p><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Patients with planning target volume (PTV) ≤ 2 cm from the BP were eligible. The BP was contoured primarily according to the RTOG 1106 atlas, while subclavian-axillary veins (SAV) were contoured according to RTOG 0236. Apical PTVs were classified as anterior (PTV-A) or posterior (PTV-B) PTVs. Variables predicting grade 2 or higher RIBP (RIBP2) were selected through least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and logistic regression.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 137 patients with 140 BPs (median follow-up, 32.1 months), 11 experienced RIBP2. For patients with RIBP2, the maximum physical dose to the BP (BP-D<sub>max</sub>) was 46.5 Gy (median; range, 35.7 to 60.7 Gy). Of these patients, 54.5 % (6/11) satisfied the RTOG limits when using SAV delineation; among them, 83.3 % (5/6) had PTV-B. For patients with PTV-B, the maximum physical dose to SAV (SAV-D<sub>max</sub>) was 11.2 Gy (median) lower than BP-D<sub>max</sub>. Maximum and 0.3 cc biologically effective doses to the BP based on the linear-quadratic-linear model (BP-BED<sub>max LQL</sub> and BP-BED<sub>0.3cc LQL</sub>, α/β = 3) were selected as predictive variables with thresholds of 118 and 73 Gy, respectively.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Contouring SAV may significantly underestimate the RIBP2 risk in dosimetry, especially for patients with PTV-B. BP contouring indicated BP-BED<sub>0.3cc LQL</sub> and BP-BED<sub>max LQL</sub> as potential predictors of RIBP2.</p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Radiotherapy & Oncology | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | Brachial plexopathy | - |
dc.subject | Delineation | - |
dc.subject | Dosimetric analysis | - |
dc.subject | Stereotactic body radiotherapy | - |
dc.title | Dosimetric analysis of brachial plexopathy after stereotactic body radiotherapy: Significance of organ delineation | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110023 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85178331755 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 190 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0167-8140 | - |