File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/02602938.2023.2271188
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85174231866
- WOS: WOS:001085729500001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Conceptualisation of teaching excellence: an analysis of teaching excellence schemes
Title | Conceptualisation of teaching excellence: an analysis of teaching excellence schemes |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | awards and recognition conceptualisation organisational culture Teaching excellence |
Issue Date | 18-May-2024 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Citation | Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024, v. 49, n. 4, p. 485-498 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Recognition of teaching excellence has become a global trend in higher education as various schemes and awards are established as a way to assure stakeholders of the quality of teaching in universities. At present, there is a lack of research into what teaching excellence means from an institutional perspective. This study explores the conceptualisation of teaching excellence in 95 award documents from research-intensive and non-research-intensive higher education institutions as well as national and regional-level teaching excellence schemes. Data were collected from official institution websites and analysed using thematic analysis. The findings show that teaching excellence is defined by five dimensions of excellence (impact, innovation, inclusivity, scholarship of teaching and learning, and student-centredness) in six aspects of teaching (pedagogy, curriculum planning and design, assessment, student support, service to communities and professional development). A matrix is constructed based on the findings to explicate the concept of teaching excellence, and potential contradictions and tensions concerning the values emphasised in the dimensions of excellence are highlighted. The findings of this study have theoretical and practical implications for researchers, policy makers, staff development personnel and practitioners. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/343946 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.738 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chan, Cecilia Ka Yuk | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Siaw Wee | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-18T03:43:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-18T03:43:01Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-05-18 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024, v. 49, n. 4, p. 485-498 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0260-2938 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/343946 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p> <span>Recognition of teaching excellence has become a global trend in higher education as various schemes and awards are established as a way to assure stakeholders of the quality of teaching in universities. At present, there is a lack of research into what teaching excellence means from an institutional perspective. This study explores the conceptualisation of teaching excellence in 95 award documents from research-intensive and non-research-intensive higher education institutions as well as national and regional-level teaching excellence schemes. Data were collected from official institution websites and analysed using thematic analysis. The findings show that teaching excellence is defined by five dimensions of excellence (impact, innovation, inclusivity, scholarship of teaching and learning, and student-centredness) in six aspects of teaching (pedagogy, curriculum planning and design, assessment, student support, service to communities and professional development). A matrix is constructed based on the findings to explicate the concept of teaching excellence, and potential contradictions and tensions concerning the values emphasised in the dimensions of excellence are highlighted. The findings of this study have theoretical and practical implications for researchers, policy makers, staff development personnel and practitioners.</span> <br></p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Taylor and Francis Group | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education | - |
dc.subject | awards and recognition | - |
dc.subject | conceptualisation | - |
dc.subject | organisational culture | - |
dc.subject | Teaching excellence | - |
dc.title | Conceptualisation of teaching excellence: an analysis of teaching excellence schemes | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/02602938.2023.2271188 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85174231866 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 49 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 485 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 498 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1469-297X | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:001085729500001 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0260-2938 | - |