File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Hybridizing Motivational Strains: How Integrative Models Are Crucial for Advancing Motivation Science

TitleHybridizing Motivational Strains: How Integrative Models Are Crucial for Advancing Motivation Science
Authors
KeywordsIntegration
Motivation science
Theoretical integration
Issue Date26-Mar-2024
PublisherSpringer
Citation
Educational Psychology Review, 2024, v. 36, n. 2 How to Cite?
Abstract

This special issue was motivated by the realization that student motivation is inherently complex and no single framework can capture it in its full richness. However, the current zeitgeist in educational psychology seems to explicitly discourage attempts at integration as researchers are incentivized to stay within their own theoretical camps. In this special issue, we asked seven research teams to revisit their theoretical assumptions and cross-fertilize their own theories with other frameworks. We also invited three distinguished luminaries to critique and comment on this undertaking. We highlighted key issues that prevent cross-fertilization of ideas across theoretical borders, surfaced potential dangers associated with naïve integration, and proffered future directions that could nudge motivation science towards a more cumulative and integrative approach.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344064
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 10.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 4.321
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKing, Ronnel B-
dc.contributor.authorFryer, Luke K-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-27T01:07:05Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-27T01:07:05Z-
dc.date.issued2024-03-26-
dc.identifier.citationEducational Psychology Review, 2024, v. 36, n. 2-
dc.identifier.issn1040-726X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344064-
dc.description.abstract<p>This special issue was motivated by the realization that student motivation is inherently complex and no single framework can capture it in its full richness. However, the current zeitgeist in educational psychology seems to explicitly discourage attempts at integration as researchers are incentivized to stay within their own theoretical camps. In this special issue, we asked seven research teams to revisit their theoretical assumptions and cross-fertilize their own theories with other frameworks. We also invited three distinguished luminaries to critique and comment on this undertaking. We highlighted key issues that prevent cross-fertilization of ideas across theoretical borders, surfaced potential dangers associated with naïve integration, and proffered future directions that could nudge motivation science towards a more cumulative and integrative approach.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.ispartofEducational Psychology Review-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectIntegration-
dc.subjectMotivation science-
dc.subjectTheoretical integration-
dc.titleHybridizing Motivational Strains: How Integrative Models Are Crucial for Advancing Motivation Science-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10648-024-09850-9-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85188614937-
dc.identifier.volume36-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.eissn1573-336X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001191258100001-
dc.identifier.issnl1040-726X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats