File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A global survey on the use of the international classification of diseases codes for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease

TitleA global survey on the use of the international classification of diseases codes for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease
Authors
KeywordsGlobal survey
ICD-11
MAFLD
Issue Date15-Jun-2024
PublisherSpringer
Citation
Hepatology International, 2024 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background: With the implementation of the 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) and the publication of the metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) nomenclature in 2020, it is important to establish consensus for the coding of MAFLD in ICD-11. This will inform subsequent revisions of ICD-11.

Methods: Using the Qualtrics XM and WJX platforms, questionnaires were sent online to MAFLD-ICD-11 coding collaborators, authors of papers, and relevant association members.

Results: A total of 890 international experts in various fields from 61 countries responded to the survey. We also achieved full coverage of provincial-level administrative regions in China. 77.1% of respondents agreed that MAFLD should be represented in ICD-11 by updating NAFLD, with no significant regional differences (77.3% in Asia and 76.6% in non-Asia, p = 0.819). Over 80% of respondents agreed or somewhat agreed with the need to assign specific codes for progressive stages of MAFLD (i.e. steatohepatitis) (92.2%), MAFLD combined with comorbidities (84.1%), or MAFLD subtypes (i.e., lean, overweight/obese, and diabetic) (86.1%).

Conclusions: This global survey by a collaborative panel of clinical, coding, health management and policy experts, indicates agreement that MAFLD should be coded in ICD-11. The data serves as a foundation for corresponding adjustments in the ICD-11 revision.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344067
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.813

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang, H-
dc.contributor.authorTargher, G-
dc.contributor.authorByrne, CD-
dc.contributor.authorKim, SU-
dc.contributor.authorWong, VW-
dc.contributor.authorValenti, L-
dc.contributor.authorGlickman, M-
dc.contributor.authorPonce, J-
dc.contributor.authorMantzoros, CS-
dc.contributor.authorCrespo, J-
dc.contributor.authorGronbaek, H-
dc.contributor.authorYang, W-
dc.contributor.authorEslam, M-
dc.contributor.authorWong, RJ-
dc.contributor.authorMachado, MV-
dc.contributor.authorYu, ML-
dc.contributor.authorGhanem, OM-
dc.contributor.authorOkanoue, T-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, JF-
dc.contributor.authorLee, YH-
dc.contributor.authorXu, XY-
dc.contributor.authorPan, Q-
dc.contributor.authorSui, M-
dc.contributor.authorLonardo, A-
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Y-
dc.contributor.authorZhu, LY-
dc.contributor.authorMoreno, C-
dc.contributor.authorMiele, L-
dc.contributor.authorLupsor-Platon, M-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, L-
dc.contributor.authorLaMasters, TL-
dc.contributor.authorGish, RG-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, H-
dc.contributor.authorNedelcu, M-
dc.contributor.authorChan, WK-
dc.contributor.authorXia, MF-
dc.contributor.authorBril, F-
dc.contributor.authorShi, JP-
dc.contributor.authorDatz, C-
dc.contributor.authorRomeo, S-
dc.contributor.authorSun, J-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, D-
dc.contributor.authorSookoian, S-
dc.contributor.authorMao, YM-
dc.contributor.authorMéndez-Sánchez, N-
dc.contributor.authorWang, XY-
dc.contributor.authorPyrsopoulos, NT-
dc.contributor.authorFan, JG-
dc.contributor.authorFouad, Y-
dc.contributor.authorSun, DQ-
dc.contributor.authorGiannini, C-
dc.contributor.authorChai, J-
dc.contributor.authorXia, ZF-
dc.contributor.authorJun, DW-
dc.contributor.authorLi, GJ-
dc.contributor.authorTreeprasertsuk, S-
dc.contributor.authorLi, YX-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, TT-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, F-
dc.contributor.authorGoh, GB-
dc.contributor.authorFuruhashi, M-
dc.contributor.authorSeto, WK-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, H-
dc.contributor.authorDi Sessa, A-
dc.contributor.authorLi, QH-
dc.contributor.authorCholongitas, E-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, L-
dc.contributor.authorSilveira, TR-
dc.contributor.authorSebastiani, G-
dc.contributor.authorAdams, LA-
dc.contributor.authorChen, W-
dc.contributor.authorQi, X-
dc.contributor.authorRankovic, I-
dc.contributor.authorde Ledinghen, V-
dc.contributor.authorLv, WJ-
dc.contributor.authorHamaguchi, M-
dc.contributor.authorKassir, R-
dc.contributor.authorMüller-Wieland, D-
dc.contributor.authorRomero-Gomez, M-
dc.contributor.authorXu, Y-
dc.contributor.authorXu, YC-
dc.contributor.authorChen, SY-
dc.contributor.authorKermansaravi, M-
dc.contributor.authorKuchay, MS-
dc.contributor.authorLefere, S-
dc.contributor.authorParmar, C-
dc.contributor.authorLip, GYH-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, CJ-
dc.contributor.authorÅberg, F-
dc.contributor.authorLau, G-
dc.contributor.authorGeorge, J-
dc.contributor.authorSarin, SK-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, JY-
dc.contributor.authorZheng, MH-
dc.contributor.authorMAFLD ICD-11 coding collaborators-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-27T01:07:06Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-27T01:07:06Z-
dc.date.issued2024-06-15-
dc.identifier.citationHepatology International, 2024-
dc.identifier.issn1936-0533-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344067-
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the implementation of the 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) and the publication of the metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) nomenclature in 2020, it is important to establish consensus for the coding of MAFLD in ICD-11. This will inform subsequent revisions of ICD-11.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Qualtrics XM and WJX platforms, questionnaires were sent online to MAFLD-ICD-11 coding collaborators, authors of papers, and relevant association members.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 890 international experts in various fields from 61 countries responded to the survey. We also achieved full coverage of provincial-level administrative regions in China. 77.1% of respondents agreed that MAFLD should be represented in ICD-11 by updating NAFLD, with no significant regional differences (77.3% in Asia and 76.6% in non-Asia, p = 0.819). Over 80% of respondents agreed or somewhat agreed with the need to assign specific codes for progressive stages of MAFLD (i.e. steatohepatitis) (92.2%), MAFLD combined with comorbidities (84.1%), or MAFLD subtypes (i.e., lean, overweight/obese, and diabetic) (86.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This global survey by a collaborative panel of clinical, coding, health management and policy experts, indicates agreement that MAFLD should be coded in ICD-11. The data serves as a foundation for corresponding adjustments in the ICD-11 revision.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.ispartofHepatology International-
dc.subjectGlobal survey-
dc.subjectICD-11-
dc.subjectMAFLD-
dc.titleA global survey on the use of the international classification of diseases codes for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12072-024-10702-5-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85196002868-
dc.identifier.eissn1936-0541-
dc.identifier.issnl1936-0533-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats