File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Stereotactic body radiotherapy as salvage treatment for recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer after prior surgery or radiotherapy

TitleStereotactic body radiotherapy as salvage treatment for recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer after prior surgery or radiotherapy
Authors
KeywordsLung
Re-irradiation
Resection
Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR)
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
Issue Date1-Feb-2019
PublisherAME Publishing
Citation
Translational Lung Cancer Research, 2018, v. 8, n. 1, p. 78-87 How to Cite?
Abstract

Treatment options for thoracic recurrences of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are limited. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging, potentially effective technology to manage recurrent NSCLC, although with limited prospective studies. This work reviews the outcomes of patients undergoing salvage SBRT for pulmonary recurrences after prior resection or prior radiotherapy for NSCLC. Following salvage SBRT, after prior external beam radiation (SBRT or conventionally fractionated), the 2-year overall survival (OS) ranged from 37% to 79% in 11 of the studies (397 patients) reviewed here, while the 2-year local control (LC) ranged from 37% to 90% in 6 studies that reported that outcome. Toxicity risks are acceptable albeit with appreciable risks of severe to potentially fatal toxicity, necessitating the need to weigh risks vs. benefits in the re-irradiation setting. There were fewer studies on the use of SBRT after prior resection. Following salvage SBRT, after prior resection, the 2-year OS ranged from 56% to 68% in 4 studies (131 patients) reviewed here, while the 2-year LC ranged from 83% to 100% in 3 of these studies. SBRT in the salvage setting after prior resection appeared to be well-tolerated, with toxicity risks comparable to historical patients treated with SBRT alone (i.e., SBRT without prior resection, which is not reviewed here). The data are limited due to the retrospective nature of published studies (all but 4 with <40 patients), with various clinical scenarios (i.e., original NSCLC stage, prior treatment, location of target amenable to salvage SBRT) and a range of SBRT dosing and techniques. More studies are needed to better understand the tumor control, survival and toxicity of SBRT for salvage therapy of NSCLC patients, as well as the potentially prognostic factors that could affect these outcomes.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344091
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.318

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMilano, Michael T-
dc.contributor.authorKong, FS-
dc.contributor.authorMovsas, Benjamin-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-03T08:40:35Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-03T08:40:35Z-
dc.date.issued2019-02-01-
dc.identifier.citationTranslational Lung Cancer Research, 2018, v. 8, n. 1, p. 78-87-
dc.identifier.issn2218-6751-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344091-
dc.description.abstract<p>Treatment options for thoracic recurrences of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are limited. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging, potentially effective technology to manage recurrent NSCLC, although with limited prospective studies. This work reviews the outcomes of patients undergoing salvage SBRT for pulmonary recurrences after prior resection or prior radiotherapy for NSCLC. Following salvage SBRT, after prior external beam radiation (SBRT or conventionally fractionated), the 2-year overall survival (OS) ranged from 37% to 79% in 11 of the studies (397 patients) reviewed here, while the 2-year local control (LC) ranged from 37% to 90% in 6 studies that reported that outcome. Toxicity risks are acceptable albeit with appreciable risks of severe to potentially fatal toxicity, necessitating the need to weigh risks <em>vs.</em> benefits in the re-irradiation setting. There were fewer studies on the use of SBRT after prior resection. Following salvage SBRT, after prior resection, the 2-year OS ranged from 56% to 68% in 4 studies (131 patients) reviewed here, while the 2-year LC ranged from 83% to 100% in 3 of these studies. SBRT in the salvage setting after prior resection appeared to be well-tolerated, with toxicity risks comparable to historical patients treated with SBRT alone (i.e., SBRT without prior resection, which is not reviewed here). The data are limited due to the retrospective nature of published studies (all but 4 with <40 patients), with various clinical scenarios (i.e., original NSCLC stage, prior treatment, location of target amenable to salvage SBRT) and a range of SBRT dosing and techniques. More studies are needed to better understand the tumor control, survival and toxicity of SBRT for salvage therapy of NSCLC patients, as well as the potentially prognostic factors that could affect these outcomes.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherAME Publishing-
dc.relation.ispartofTranslational Lung Cancer Research-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectLung-
dc.subjectRe-irradiation-
dc.subjectResection-
dc.subjectStereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR)-
dc.subjectStereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)-
dc.titleStereotactic body radiotherapy as salvage treatment for recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer after prior surgery or radiotherapy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.21037/tlcr.2018.08.15-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85060681759-
dc.identifier.volume8-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage78-
dc.identifier.epage87-
dc.identifier.eissn2226-4477-
dc.identifier.issnl2218-6751-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats