File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Diagnostic accuracy of salivary active matrix metalloproteinase (aMMP)‐8 point‐of‐care test for detecting periodontitis in adults: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

TitleDiagnostic accuracy of salivary active matrix metalloproteinase (aMMP)‐8 point‐of‐care test for detecting periodontitis in adults: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Authors
KeywordsaMMP-8
diagnostic accuracy
periodontitis
point-of-care test
systematic review
Issue Date19-May-2024
PublisherWiley
Citation
Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 2024 How to Cite?
Abstract

Objective

To determine the accuracy of salivary active matrix metalloproteinase (aMMP)-8 point-of-care test (POCT) for detecting periodontitis in adults, through meta-analysis.

Materials and Methods

Diagnostic studies evaluating the accuracy of salivary/oral rinse aMMP-8 POCT for detecting periodontitis in adults, when compared with clinical examination, were considered eligible. A comprehensive search was performed up to 31 August 2023 through five databases. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 was utilized to evaluate the methodological quality of the included articles. Meta-analysis was performed using Bayesian bivariate hierarchical model and subgroup analysis.

Results

From 368 screened studies, 6 studies (4 cross-sectional and 2 longitudinal studies) were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of salivary aMMP-8-POCT for detecting periodontitis were 0.63 (95% CI: 0.41–0.82) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.65–0.95), respectively. Subgroup analyses revealed that the 95% CI for oral fluid types, predefined diagnostic thresholds and the POCT systems largely overlapped, indicating that the differences between them may not be significant.

Conclusion

Salivary aMMP-8 POCT shows fair accuracy for detecting periodontitis. The diagnostic accuracy cannot be significantly influenced by the types of oral fluids, predefined diagnostic thresholds or the specific POCT systems used. More research is needed to confirm the clinical utility and implementation of aMMP-8 POCT in the diagnosis of periodontitis.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344199
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.249

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWei, Shimin-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Tingting-
dc.contributor.authorSáenz‐Ravello, Gustavo-
dc.contributor.authorGao, Hanqi-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yong-
dc.contributor.authorTonetti, Maurizio S-
dc.contributor.authorDeng, Ke-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-16T03:41:35Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-16T03:41:35Z-
dc.date.issued2024-05-19-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2024-
dc.identifier.issn0303-6979-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344199-
dc.description.abstract<h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the accuracy of salivary active matrix metalloproteinase (aMMP)-8 point-of-care test (POCT) for detecting periodontitis in adults, through meta-analysis.</p><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Diagnostic studies evaluating the accuracy of salivary/oral rinse aMMP-8 POCT for detecting periodontitis in adults, when compared with clinical examination, were considered eligible. A comprehensive search was performed up to 31 August 2023 through five databases. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 was utilized to evaluate the methodological quality of the included articles. Meta-analysis was performed using Bayesian bivariate hierarchical model and subgroup analysis.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>From 368 screened studies, 6 studies (4 cross-sectional and 2 longitudinal studies) were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of salivary aMMP-8-POCT for detecting periodontitis were 0.63 (95% CI: 0.41–0.82) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.65–0.95), respectively. Subgroup analyses revealed that the 95% CI for oral fluid types, predefined diagnostic thresholds and the POCT systems largely overlapped, indicating that the differences between them may not be significant.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Salivary aMMP-8 POCT shows fair accuracy for detecting periodontitis. The diagnostic accuracy cannot be significantly influenced by the types of oral fluids, predefined diagnostic thresholds or the specific POCT systems used. More research is needed to confirm the clinical utility and implementation of aMMP-8 POCT in the diagnosis of periodontitis.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Periodontology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectaMMP-8-
dc.subjectdiagnostic accuracy-
dc.subjectperiodontitis-
dc.subjectpoint-of-care test-
dc.subjectsystematic review-
dc.titleDiagnostic accuracy of salivary active matrix metalloproteinase (aMMP)‐8 point‐of‐care test for detecting periodontitis in adults: A systematic review and meta‐analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jcpe.14000-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85193485848-
dc.identifier.eissn1600-051X-
dc.identifier.issnl0303-6979-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats