Heterogeneity of microstructures in a Cu–Zr based amorphous alloy composite reinforced by crystalline phases

Abstract

<p>Amorphous alloy composites (AACs) comprising reinforcing crystalline phases exhibit far better mechanical properties than their base amorphous alloy counterparts, and Cu–Zr based alloys consisting of B2 phase particles embedded in an amorphous matrix are well-researched AACs in this respect. Traditionally, the B2 particles in Cu–Zr based AACs may appear to be homogeneously crystalline (without any amorphous phase inside), the glassy matrix homogeneously amorphous, and their interfaces atomically sharp. Yet, such a picture would pose difficulties in understanding how crystallization can happen in the glassy matrix, since the crystallized product is denser than but iso-stoichiometric with the matrix. The present work provides insights into this puzzle, by using electron microscopy, nanoindentation and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to investigate the structures and mechanical properties of the crystalline and amorphous phases, and their interfaces in a Cu62Zr34.5Al3Nb0.5 AAC. Surprisingly, in this AAC, the superficially crystalline particles with tens to hundreds of microns large are found to be heterogeneous at the sub-micron scale, comprising nano-crystallites embedded in a glassy matrix, and the amorphous phase outside also exhibits a gradient in free volume content towards the interface. Smaller particles containing only B2 nano-crystallites are found to be softer than the amorphous matrix, while larger particles are harder than the amorphous phase due to martensitic transformation into the B19’ phase. MD simulations indicate that the B2 phase is marginally more stable than the glassy state, and on crystallization the densification leads to free-volume generation in the surrounding glassy matrix as observed experimentally. Mechanics analysis indicates that the strain energy in the glassy matrix associated with free-volume generation scales with the volume of the crystallization, as would be the crystallization energy itself. Hence, crystallization in the AAC leading to a two-phase structure is a spontaneous but kinetically limiting process arising from the net energy difference between the crystallization energy and free-volume energy produced in the glassy matrix. This work provides a detailed understanding of the heterogeneity in the microstructures in Cu–Zr based AACs, to shed light on the crystallization of the iso-stoichiometric B2 phase from the amorphous phase.</p>