File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Popular contention and its impact in Rural China

TitlePopular contention and its impact in Rural China
Authors
KeywordsCollective action
Contention
Implementation
Peasants
Protest
Issue Date2005
Citation
Comparative Political Studies, 2005, v. 38, n. 3, p. 235-259 How to Cite?
AbstractProtest outcomes in rural China are typically an outgrowth of interaction between activists, sympathetic elites, targets, and the public. Popular agitation first alerts concerned officials to poor policy implementation and may prompt them to take corrective steps. As a result of participating in contention, certain activists feel empowered and become more likely to take part in future challenges, whereas others feel disillusioned and lapse into passivity. In the course of observing collective action, some onlookers are sensitized to protesters' concerns and public opinion is affected. Without popular action, better implementation, biographical change, and effects on the public would not emerge, but nor would they without involvement from above. Studying the impact of this protest thus sheds light on two issues that have long troubled students of contentious politics: (a) how to get a grip on indirect, mediated consequences; and (b) how to think about causality when change is a result of popular action as well as openings provided by sympathetic elites. © 2005 Sage Publications.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344456
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.491

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, Kevin J.-
dc.contributor.authorLianjiang, L. I.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-31T03:03:36Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-31T03:03:36Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.citationComparative Political Studies, 2005, v. 38, n. 3, p. 235-259-
dc.identifier.issn0010-4140-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344456-
dc.description.abstractProtest outcomes in rural China are typically an outgrowth of interaction between activists, sympathetic elites, targets, and the public. Popular agitation first alerts concerned officials to poor policy implementation and may prompt them to take corrective steps. As a result of participating in contention, certain activists feel empowered and become more likely to take part in future challenges, whereas others feel disillusioned and lapse into passivity. In the course of observing collective action, some onlookers are sensitized to protesters' concerns and public opinion is affected. Without popular action, better implementation, biographical change, and effects on the public would not emerge, but nor would they without involvement from above. Studying the impact of this protest thus sheds light on two issues that have long troubled students of contentious politics: (a) how to get a grip on indirect, mediated consequences; and (b) how to think about causality when change is a result of popular action as well as openings provided by sympathetic elites. © 2005 Sage Publications.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofComparative Political Studies-
dc.subjectCollective action-
dc.subjectContention-
dc.subjectImplementation-
dc.subjectPeasants-
dc.subjectProtest-
dc.titlePopular contention and its impact in Rural China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0010414004272528-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-16244376819-
dc.identifier.volume38-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage235-
dc.identifier.epage259-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats