File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: An interpretable knee replacement risk assessment system for osteoarthritis patients

TitleAn interpretable knee replacement risk assessment system for osteoarthritis patients
Authors
KeywordsKnee osteoarthritis
Machine learning
Prognosis
Self-administrable
Survival analysis
Issue Date1-Jun-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open, 2024, v. 6, n. 2 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a complex disease with heterogeneous representations. Although it is modifiable to prevention and early treatment, there still lacks a reliable and accurate prognostic tool. Hence, we aim to develop a quantitative and self-administrable knee replacement (KR) risk stratification system for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) patients with clinical features. Method: A total of 14 baseline features were extracted from 9592 cases in the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) cohort. A survival model was constructed using the Random Survival Forests algorithm. The prediction performance was evaluated with the concordance index (C-index) and average receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). A three-class KR risk stratification system was built to differentiate three distinct KR-free survival groups. Thereafter, Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) was introduced for model explanation. Results: KR incidence was accurately predicted by the model with a C-index of 0.770 (±0.0215) and an average AUC of 0.807 (±0.0181) with 14 clinical features. Three distinct survival groups were observed from the ten-point KR risk stratification system with a four-year KR rate of 0.79%, 5.78%, and 16.2% from the low, medium, and high-risk groups respectively. KR is mainly caused by pain medication use, age, surgery history, diabetes, and a high body mass index, as revealed by SHAP. Conclusion: A self-administrable and interpretable KR survival model was developed, underscoring a KR risk scoring system to stratify KOA patients. It will encourage regular self-assessments within the community and facilitate personalised healthcare for both primary and secondary prevention of KOA.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344632

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, HHT-
dc.contributor.authorChan, LC-
dc.contributor.authorChan, PK-
dc.contributor.authorWen, C-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-31T06:22:40Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-31T06:22:40Z-
dc.date.issued2024-06-01-
dc.identifier.citationOsteoarthritis and Cartilage Open, 2024, v. 6, n. 2-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344632-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a complex disease with heterogeneous representations. Although it is modifiable to prevention and early treatment, there still lacks a reliable and accurate prognostic tool. Hence, we aim to develop a quantitative and self-administrable knee replacement (KR) risk stratification system for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) patients with clinical features. Method: A total of 14 baseline features were extracted from 9592 cases in the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) cohort. A survival model was constructed using the Random Survival Forests algorithm. The prediction performance was evaluated with the concordance index (C-index) and average receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). A three-class KR risk stratification system was built to differentiate three distinct KR-free survival groups. Thereafter, Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) was introduced for model explanation. Results: KR incidence was accurately predicted by the model with a C-index of 0.770 (±0.0215) and an average AUC of 0.807 (±0.0181) with 14 clinical features. Three distinct survival groups were observed from the ten-point KR risk stratification system with a four-year KR rate of 0.79%, 5.78%, and 16.2% from the low, medium, and high-risk groups respectively. KR is mainly caused by pain medication use, age, surgery history, diabetes, and a high body mass index, as revealed by SHAP. Conclusion: A self-administrable and interpretable KR survival model was developed, underscoring a KR risk scoring system to stratify KOA patients. It will encourage regular self-assessments within the community and facilitate personalised healthcare for both primary and secondary prevention of KOA.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofOsteoarthritis and Cartilage Open-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectKnee osteoarthritis-
dc.subjectMachine learning-
dc.subjectPrognosis-
dc.subjectSelf-administrable-
dc.subjectSurvival analysis-
dc.titleAn interpretable knee replacement risk assessment system for osteoarthritis patients-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100440-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85185469395-
dc.identifier.volume6-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.eissn2665-9131-
dc.identifier.issnl2665-9131-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats