File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Robust insurance design with distortion risk measures

TitleRobust insurance design with distortion risk measures
Authors
KeywordsDistortion risk measure
L2 distance
Optimal insurance
Risk management
Tail Value-at-Risk
Issue Date16-Jul-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
European Journal of Operational Research, 2024, v. 316, n. 2, p. 694-706 How to Cite?
AbstractThis paper studies the optimal insurance problem within the risk minimization framework and from a policyholder's perspective. We assume that the decision maker (DM) is uncertain about the underlying distribution of her loss and considers all the distributions that are close to a given (benchmark) distribution, where the “closeness” is measured by the L2 or L1 distance. Under the expected-value premium principle, the DM picks the indemnity function that minimizes her risk exposure under the worst-case loss distribution. By assuming that the DM's preferences are given by a convex distortion risk measure, we disentangle the structures of the optimal indemnity function and worst-case loss distribution in an analytical way, and provide the explicit forms for both of them under specific distortion risk measures. We also compare the results under the L2 distance and the first-order Wasserstein (L1) distance. Some numerical examples are presented at the end to illustrate the implications of our main results.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344635
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 6.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.321

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBoonen, Tim J.-
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Wenjun-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-31T06:22:41Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-31T06:22:41Z-
dc.date.issued2024-07-16-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 2024, v. 316, n. 2, p. 694-706-
dc.identifier.issn0377-2217-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344635-
dc.description.abstractThis paper studies the optimal insurance problem within the risk minimization framework and from a policyholder's perspective. We assume that the decision maker (DM) is uncertain about the underlying distribution of her loss and considers all the distributions that are close to a given (benchmark) distribution, where the “closeness” is measured by the L2 or L1 distance. Under the expected-value premium principle, the DM picks the indemnity function that minimizes her risk exposure under the worst-case loss distribution. By assuming that the DM's preferences are given by a convex distortion risk measure, we disentangle the structures of the optimal indemnity function and worst-case loss distribution in an analytical way, and provide the explicit forms for both of them under specific distortion risk measures. We also compare the results under the L2 distance and the first-order Wasserstein (L1) distance. Some numerical examples are presented at the end to illustrate the implications of our main results.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Operational Research-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectDistortion risk measure-
dc.subjectL2 distance-
dc.subjectOptimal insurance-
dc.subjectRisk management-
dc.subjectTail Value-at-Risk-
dc.titleRobust insurance design with distortion risk measures-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejor.2024.02.002-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85185600992-
dc.identifier.volume316-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage694-
dc.identifier.epage706-
dc.identifier.eissn1872-6860-
dc.identifier.issnl0377-2217-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats