File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The Fulfillment of Parties’ Election Pledges: A Comparative Study on the Impact of Power Sharing

TitleThe Fulfillment of Parties’ Election Pledges: A Comparative Study on the Impact of Power Sharing
Authors
Issue Date2017
Citation
American Journal of Political Science, 2017, v. 61, n. 3, p. 527-542 How to Cite?
AbstractWhy are some parties more likely than others to keep the promises they made during previous election campaigns? This study provides the first large-scale comparative analysis of pledge fulfillment with common definitions. We study the fulfillment of over 20,000 pledges made in 57 election campaigns in 12 countries, and our findings challenge the common view of parties as promise breakers. Many parties that enter government executives are highly likely to fulfill their pledges, and significantly more so than parties that do not enter government executives. We explain variation in the fulfillment of governing parties’ pledges by the extent to which parties share power in government. Parties in single-party executives, both with and without legislative majorities, have the highest fulfillment rates. Within coalition governments, the likelihood of pledge fulfillment is highest when the party receives the chief executive post and when another governing party made a similar pledge.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345085
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 4.629

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorThomson, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorRoyed, Terry-
dc.contributor.authorNaurin, Elin-
dc.contributor.authorArtés, Joaquín-
dc.contributor.authorCostello, Rory-
dc.contributor.authorEnnser-Jedenastik, Laurenz-
dc.contributor.authorFerguson, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorKostadinova, Petia-
dc.contributor.authorMoury, Catherine-
dc.contributor.authorPétry, François-
dc.contributor.authorPraprotnik, Katrin-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-15T09:25:08Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-15T09:25:08Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2017, v. 61, n. 3, p. 527-542-
dc.identifier.issn0092-5853-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345085-
dc.description.abstractWhy are some parties more likely than others to keep the promises they made during previous election campaigns? This study provides the first large-scale comparative analysis of pledge fulfillment with common definitions. We study the fulfillment of over 20,000 pledges made in 57 election campaigns in 12 countries, and our findings challenge the common view of parties as promise breakers. Many parties that enter government executives are highly likely to fulfill their pledges, and significantly more so than parties that do not enter government executives. We explain variation in the fulfillment of governing parties’ pledges by the extent to which parties share power in government. Parties in single-party executives, both with and without legislative majorities, have the highest fulfillment rates. Within coalition governments, the likelihood of pledge fulfillment is highest when the party receives the chief executive post and when another governing party made a similar pledge.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Political Science-
dc.titleThe Fulfillment of Parties’ Election Pledges: A Comparative Study on the Impact of Power Sharing-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ajps.12313-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85020232769-
dc.identifier.volume61-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage527-
dc.identifier.epage542-
dc.identifier.eissn1540-5907-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats