File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/ocr.12826
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85196670189
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Tooth movement analysis of maxillary dentition distalization using clear aligners with buccal and palatal mini‐screw anchorages: A finite element study
Title | Tooth movement analysis of maxillary dentition distalization using clear aligners with buccal and palatal mini‐screw anchorages: A finite element study |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | clear aligner finite element analysis maxillary dentition distalization mini-screw |
Issue Date | 22-Jun-2024 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Citation | Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research, 2024 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objective: To assess the tooth movement trends during the three stages of maxillary dentition distalization with clear aligners (CA) and to compare the efficacy of different mini-screw anchorage systems. Materials and Methods: Three-dimensional (3D) finite element models of three anchorage systems (A, control group; B, buccal mini-screw anchorage group; C, palatal mini-screw anchorage group) were established. Three stages of simulating maxillary dentition distalization with CA included maxillary molar distalization (stage 1), maxillary premolar distalization (stage 2) and maxillary anterior teeth retraction (stage 3). Therefore, a total of nine models were constructed to analyse the 3D displacement of maxillary teeth during the distalization process. Results: The displacement pattern of maxillary dentition during distalization was similar across the three groups, but with varying magnitudes. During stage 1, groups B and C exhibited greater amounts of molar distalization compared to group A. Group C also demonstrated the least amount of labial movement of the maxillary central incisor compared to the other two groups. During stage 2, the mesial displacement of the maxillary first molar was less significant in groups B and C than in group A. In the final stage, group C exhibited a greater amount of maxillary anterior retraction compared to groups A and B. Conclusion: The palatal mini-screw anchorage system was effective in reducing anchorage loss and improving the efficacy of maxillary dentition distalization with CA. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/345621 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.4 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.967 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Guo, Runzhi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Li, Linwei | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, Xiang Yao | - |
dc.contributor.author | Qin, Qianyi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zheng, Yunfei | - |
dc.contributor.author | Huang, Yiping | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lin, Yifan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Li, Weiran | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-27T09:10:03Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-27T09:10:03Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-06-22 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research, 2024 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1601-6335 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/345621 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>Objective: To assess the tooth movement trends during the three stages of maxillary dentition distalization with clear aligners (CA) and to compare the efficacy of different mini-screw anchorage systems. Materials and Methods: Three-dimensional (3D) finite element models of three anchorage systems (A, control group; B, buccal mini-screw anchorage group; C, palatal mini-screw anchorage group) were established. Three stages of simulating maxillary dentition distalization with CA included maxillary molar distalization (stage 1), maxillary premolar distalization (stage 2) and maxillary anterior teeth retraction (stage 3). Therefore, a total of nine models were constructed to analyse the 3D displacement of maxillary teeth during the distalization process. Results: The displacement pattern of maxillary dentition during distalization was similar across the three groups, but with varying magnitudes. During stage 1, groups B and C exhibited greater amounts of molar distalization compared to group A. Group C also demonstrated the least amount of labial movement of the maxillary central incisor compared to the other two groups. During stage 2, the mesial displacement of the maxillary first molar was less significant in groups B and C than in group A. In the final stage, group C exhibited a greater amount of maxillary anterior retraction compared to groups A and B. Conclusion: The palatal mini-screw anchorage system was effective in reducing anchorage loss and improving the efficacy of maxillary dentition distalization with CA.<br></p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Wiley | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | clear aligner | - |
dc.subject | finite element analysis | - |
dc.subject | maxillary dentition distalization | - |
dc.subject | mini-screw | - |
dc.title | Tooth movement analysis of maxillary dentition distalization using clear aligners with buccal and palatal mini‐screw anchorages: A finite element study | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/ocr.12826 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85196670189 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1601-6343 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1601-6335 | - |