File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Achilles’ heel: elderly COVID-19 vaccination policy in China

TitleAchilles’ heel: elderly COVID-19 vaccination policy in China
Authors
KeywordsCOVID-19
Elderly vaccination
Multiple streams framework
Policy analysis
Issue Date1-Dec-2024
PublisherBioMed Central
Citation
Health Research Policy and Systems, 2024, v. 22, n. 1 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background: Despite high overall COVID-19 vaccine coverage, the continuously low elderly vaccination rate in mainland China remains a dangerous threat as the country shifts away from its zero-Covid policy. This retrospective study uses the Multiple Streams Framework to examine how macro-level factors may explain poor elderly vaccination outcomes. Methods: We performed a thematic analysis of qualitative data obtained from 95 official press conferences from October 20, 2020, to February 27, 2023, vaccination-related policy documents, and media coverage, using both inductive and deductive coding approaches. Results: Our findings suggest that in the problem stream, elderly vaccination was not a “focusing event” during the initial vaccine rollout, resulting in delayed outreach to this population. Additionally, ideologically driven complacency and discrepancies in top-down implementation undermined elderly vaccination in the political stream. In the policy stream, precautious and ambiguous statements, inconsistent policy content, radical shifting media messages, and less age-friendly digital technologies also affected elderly vaccination. Conclusions: The poor convergence of the three streams led the elderly to be the Achilles’ heel of China’s COVID-19 containment strategy. Future studies should focus on priority identification, adoption of enforcement measures, and timely and effective policy dissemination. The empirical lessons from China can inform and optimize elderly vaccination policy design and implementation in the post-pandemic era.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345950
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.563

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDeng, Ziru-
dc.contributor.authorGrépin, Karen A.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-04T07:06:43Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-04T07:06:43Z-
dc.date.issued2024-12-01-
dc.identifier.citationHealth Research Policy and Systems, 2024, v. 22, n. 1-
dc.identifier.issn1478-4505-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345950-
dc.description.abstract<p> Background: Despite high overall COVID-19 vaccine coverage, the continuously low elderly vaccination rate in mainland China remains a dangerous threat as the country shifts away from its zero-Covid policy. This retrospective study uses the Multiple Streams Framework to examine how macro-level factors may explain poor elderly vaccination outcomes. Methods: We performed a thematic analysis of qualitative data obtained from 95 official press conferences from October 20, 2020, to February 27, 2023, vaccination-related policy documents, and media coverage, using both inductive and deductive coding approaches. Results: Our findings suggest that in the problem stream, elderly vaccination was not a “focusing event” during the initial vaccine rollout, resulting in delayed outreach to this population. Additionally, ideologically driven complacency and discrepancies in top-down implementation undermined elderly vaccination in the political stream. In the policy stream, precautious and ambiguous statements, inconsistent policy content, radical shifting media messages, and less age-friendly digital technologies also affected elderly vaccination. Conclusions: The poor convergence of the three streams led the elderly to be the Achilles’ heel of China’s COVID-19 containment strategy. Future studies should focus on priority identification, adoption of enforcement measures, and timely and effective policy dissemination. The empirical lessons from China can inform and optimize elderly vaccination policy design and implementation in the post-pandemic era. <br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.relation.ispartofHealth Research Policy and Systems-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectCOVID-19-
dc.subjectElderly vaccination-
dc.subjectMultiple streams framework-
dc.subjectPolicy analysis-
dc.titleAchilles’ heel: elderly COVID-19 vaccination policy in China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12961-024-01155-1-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85200460737-
dc.identifier.volume22-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.eissn1478-4505-
dc.identifier.issnl1478-4505-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats