File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Health care access, costs, and treatment dynamics: Evidence from in vitro fertilization

TitleHealth care access, costs, and treatment dynamics: Evidence from in vitro fertilization
Authors
Issue Date2018
Citation
American Economic Review, 2018, v. 108, n. 12, p. 3725-3777 How to Cite?
AbstractWe study public policies designed to improve access and reduce costs for in vitro fertilization (IVF). High out-of-pocket prices can deter potential patients from IVF, while active patients have an incentive to risk costly high-order pregnancies to improve their odds of treatment success. We analyze IVF's rich choice structure by estimating a dynamic model of patients' choices within and across treatments. Policy simulations show that insurance mandates for treatment or hard limits on treatment aggressiveness can improve access or costs, but not both. Insurance plus price-based incentives against risky treatment, however, can together improve patient welfare and reduce medical costs.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/346688
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 10.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 22.344

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, Barton H.-
dc.contributor.authorJungheim, Emily-
dc.contributor.authorMcManus, Brian-
dc.contributor.authorPantano, Juan-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-17T04:12:36Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-17T04:12:36Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Economic Review, 2018, v. 108, n. 12, p. 3725-3777-
dc.identifier.issn0002-8282-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/346688-
dc.description.abstractWe study public policies designed to improve access and reduce costs for in vitro fertilization (IVF). High out-of-pocket prices can deter potential patients from IVF, while active patients have an incentive to risk costly high-order pregnancies to improve their odds of treatment success. We analyze IVF's rich choice structure by estimating a dynamic model of patients' choices within and across treatments. Policy simulations show that insurance mandates for treatment or hard limits on treatment aggressiveness can improve access or costs, but not both. Insurance plus price-based incentives against risky treatment, however, can together improve patient welfare and reduce medical costs.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Economic Review-
dc.titleHealth care access, costs, and treatment dynamics: Evidence from in vitro fertilization-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1257/aer.20161014-
dc.identifier.pmid30497124-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85057571738-
dc.identifier.volume108-
dc.identifier.issue12-
dc.identifier.spage3725-
dc.identifier.epage3777-
dc.identifier.eissn1944-7981-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats