File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Advance care planning after hospital discharge: Qualitative analysis of facilitators and barriers from patient interviews

TitleAdvance care planning after hospital discharge: Qualitative analysis of facilitators and barriers from patient interviews
Authors
KeywordsAdvance care planning
Communication
Conversation guide
Issue Date2018
Citation
BMC Palliative Care, 2018, v. 17, n. 1, article no. 127 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Patients who engage in Advance Care Planning (ACP) are more likely to get care consistent with their values. We sought to determine the barriers and facilitators to ACP engagement after discharge from hospital. Methods: Prior to discharge from hospital eligible patients received a standardized conversation about prognosis and ACP. Each patient was given an ACP workbook and asked to complete it over the following four weeks. We included frail elderly patients with a high risk of death admitted to general internal medicine wards at a tertiary care academic teaching hospital. Four weeks after discharge we conducted semi-structured interviews with patients. Interviews were transcribed, coded and analysed with thematic analysis. Themes were categorized according to the theoretical domains framework. Results: We performed 17 interviews. All Theoretical Domain Framework components except for Social/Professional Identity and Behavioral Regulation were identified in our data. Poor knowledge about ACP and physician communication skills were barriers partially addressed by our intervention. Some patients found it difficult to discuss ACP during an acute illness. For others acute illness made ACP discussions more relevant. Uncertainty about future health motivated some participants to engage in ACP while others found that ACP discussions prevented them from living in the moment and stripped them of hope that better days were ahead. Conclusions: For some patients acute illness resulting in admission to hospital can be an opportunity to engage in ACP conversations but for others ACP discussions are antithetical to the goals of hospital care.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/346689

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPeck, Vanessa-
dc.contributor.authorValiani, Sabira-
dc.contributor.authorTanuseputro, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorMulpuru, Sunita-
dc.contributor.authorKyeremanteng, Kwadwo-
dc.contributor.authorFitzgibbon, Edward-
dc.contributor.authorForster, Alan-
dc.contributor.authorKobewka, Daniel-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-17T04:12:37Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-17T04:12:37Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Palliative Care, 2018, v. 17, n. 1, article no. 127-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/346689-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Patients who engage in Advance Care Planning (ACP) are more likely to get care consistent with their values. We sought to determine the barriers and facilitators to ACP engagement after discharge from hospital. Methods: Prior to discharge from hospital eligible patients received a standardized conversation about prognosis and ACP. Each patient was given an ACP workbook and asked to complete it over the following four weeks. We included frail elderly patients with a high risk of death admitted to general internal medicine wards at a tertiary care academic teaching hospital. Four weeks after discharge we conducted semi-structured interviews with patients. Interviews were transcribed, coded and analysed with thematic analysis. Themes were categorized according to the theoretical domains framework. Results: We performed 17 interviews. All Theoretical Domain Framework components except for Social/Professional Identity and Behavioral Regulation were identified in our data. Poor knowledge about ACP and physician communication skills were barriers partially addressed by our intervention. Some patients found it difficult to discuss ACP during an acute illness. For others acute illness made ACP discussions more relevant. Uncertainty about future health motivated some participants to engage in ACP while others found that ACP discussions prevented them from living in the moment and stripped them of hope that better days were ahead. Conclusions: For some patients acute illness resulting in admission to hospital can be an opportunity to engage in ACP conversations but for others ACP discussions are antithetical to the goals of hospital care.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Palliative Care-
dc.subjectAdvance care planning-
dc.subjectCommunication-
dc.subjectConversation guide-
dc.titleAdvance care planning after hospital discharge: Qualitative analysis of facilitators and barriers from patient interviews-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12904-018-0379-0-
dc.identifier.pmid30518345-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85058529341-
dc.identifier.volume17-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 127-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 127-
dc.identifier.eissn1472-684X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats