File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1186/s12913-021-07318-y
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85120782068
- PMID: 34872546
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Characteristics and resource utilization of high-cost users in the intensive care unit: a population-based cohort study
Title | Characteristics and resource utilization of high-cost users in the intensive care unit: a population-based cohort study |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Costs Critically ill Healthcare expenditure High-cost users Intensive care unit |
Issue Date | 2021 |
Citation | BMC Health Services Research, 2021, v. 21, n. 1, article no. 1312 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background: Healthcare expenditure within the intensive care unit (ICU) is costly. A cost reduction strategy may be to target patients accounting for a disproportionate amount of healthcare spending, or high-cost users. This study aims to describe high-cost users in the ICU, including health outcomes and cost patterns. Methods: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of patients with ICU admissions in Ontario from 2011 to 2018. Patients with total healthcare costs in the year following ICU admission (including the admission itself) in the upper 10th percentile were defined as high-cost users. We compared characteristics and outcomes including length of stay, mortality, disposition, and costs between groups. Results: Among 370,061 patients included, 37,006 were high-cost users. High-cost users were 64.2 years old, 58.3% male, and had more comorbidities (41.2% had ≥3) when likened to non-high cost users (66.1 years old, 57.2% male, 27.9% had ≥3 comorbidities). ICU length of stay was four times greater for high-cost users compared to non-high cost users (22.4 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 22.0–22.7 days vs. 5.56 days, 95% CI 5.54–5.57 days). High-cost users had lower in-hospital mortality (10.0% vs.14.2%), but increased dispositioning outside of home (77.4% vs. 42.2%) compared to non-high-cost users. Total healthcare costs were five-fold higher for high-cost users ($238,231, 95% CI $237,020–$239,442) compared to non-high-cost users ($45,155, 95% CI $45,046–$45,264). High-cost users accounted for 37.0% of total healthcare costs. Conclusion: High-cost users have increased length of stay, lower in-hospital mortality, and higher total healthcare costs when compared to non-high-cost users. Further studies into cost patterns and predictors of high-cost users are necessary to identify methods of decreasing healthcare expenditure. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/346818 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Dziegielewski, Claudia | - |
dc.contributor.author | Talarico, Robert | - |
dc.contributor.author | Imsirovic, Haris | - |
dc.contributor.author | Qureshi, Danial | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choudhri, Yasmeen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tanuseputro, Peter | - |
dc.contributor.author | Thompson, Laura H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kyeremanteng, Kwadwo | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-17T04:13:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-17T04:13:28Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | BMC Health Services Research, 2021, v. 21, n. 1, article no. 1312 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/346818 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Healthcare expenditure within the intensive care unit (ICU) is costly. A cost reduction strategy may be to target patients accounting for a disproportionate amount of healthcare spending, or high-cost users. This study aims to describe high-cost users in the ICU, including health outcomes and cost patterns. Methods: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of patients with ICU admissions in Ontario from 2011 to 2018. Patients with total healthcare costs in the year following ICU admission (including the admission itself) in the upper 10th percentile were defined as high-cost users. We compared characteristics and outcomes including length of stay, mortality, disposition, and costs between groups. Results: Among 370,061 patients included, 37,006 were high-cost users. High-cost users were 64.2 years old, 58.3% male, and had more comorbidities (41.2% had ≥3) when likened to non-high cost users (66.1 years old, 57.2% male, 27.9% had ≥3 comorbidities). ICU length of stay was four times greater for high-cost users compared to non-high cost users (22.4 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 22.0–22.7 days vs. 5.56 days, 95% CI 5.54–5.57 days). High-cost users had lower in-hospital mortality (10.0% vs.14.2%), but increased dispositioning outside of home (77.4% vs. 42.2%) compared to non-high-cost users. Total healthcare costs were five-fold higher for high-cost users ($238,231, 95% CI $237,020–$239,442) compared to non-high-cost users ($45,155, 95% CI $45,046–$45,264). High-cost users accounted for 37.0% of total healthcare costs. Conclusion: High-cost users have increased length of stay, lower in-hospital mortality, and higher total healthcare costs when compared to non-high-cost users. Further studies into cost patterns and predictors of high-cost users are necessary to identify methods of decreasing healthcare expenditure. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | BMC Health Services Research | - |
dc.subject | Costs | - |
dc.subject | Critically ill | - |
dc.subject | Healthcare expenditure | - |
dc.subject | High-cost users | - |
dc.subject | Intensive care unit | - |
dc.title | Characteristics and resource utilization of high-cost users in the intensive care unit: a population-based cohort study | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12913-021-07318-y | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 34872546 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85120782068 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 21 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. 1312 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. 1312 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1472-6963 | - |