File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Endocuff with or Without Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy in Detection of Colorectal Adenoma: A Randomized Colonoscopy Trial

TitleEndocuff with or Without Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy in Detection of Colorectal Adenoma: A Randomized Colonoscopy Trial
Authors
Keywordsartificial intelligence
colonic adenoma.
colonic polyp
colonoscopy
endocuff
Issue Date1-Jul-2024
PublisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Citation
The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2024, v. 119, n. 7, p. 1318-1325 How to Cite?
AbstractINTRODUCTION:Both artificial intelligence (AI) and distal attachment devices have been shown to improve adenoma detection rate and reduce miss rate during colonoscopy. We studied the combined effect of Endocuff and AI on enhancing detection rates of various colonic lesions.METHODS:This was a 3-Arm prospective randomized colonoscopy study involving patients aged 40 years or older. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to undergo Endocuff with AI, AI alone, or standard high-definition (HD) colonoscopy. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR) between the Endocuff-AI and AI groups while secondary outcomes included detection rates of polyp (PDR), sessile serrated lesion (sessile detection rate [SDR]), and advanced adenoma (advanced adenoma detection rate) between the 2 groups.RESULTS:A total of 682 patients were included (mean age 65.4 years, 52.3% male), with 53.7% undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy. The ADR for the Endocuff-AI, AI, and HD groups was 58.7%, 53.8%, and 46.3%, respectively, while the corresponding PDR was 77.0%, 74.0%, and 61.2%. A significant increase in ADR, PDR, and SDR was observed between the Endocuff-AI and AI groups (ADR difference: 4.9%, 95% CI: 1.4%-8.2%, P = 0.03; PDR difference: 3.0%, 95% CI: 0.4%-5.8%, P = 0.04; SDR difference: 6.4%, 95% CI: 3.4%-9.7%, P < 0.01). Both Endocuff-AI and AI groups had a higher ADR, PDR, SDR, and advanced adenoma detection rate than the HD group (all P < 0.01).DISCUSSION:Endocuff in combination with AI further improves various colonic lesion detection rates when compared with AI alone.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347184
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 8.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.391

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLui, Thomas Ka Luen-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Carla Pui Mei-
dc.contributor.authorTo, Elvis Wai Pan-
dc.contributor.authorKo, Michael Kwan Lung-
dc.contributor.authorTsui, Vivien Wai Man-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Kevin Sze Hang-
dc.contributor.authorHui, Cynthia Ka Yin-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Michael Ka Shing-
dc.contributor.authorMak, Loey Lung Yi-
dc.contributor.authorHui, Rex Wan Hin-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Siu Yin-
dc.contributor.authorSeto, Wai Kay-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Wai K-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T00:30:58Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-18T00:30:58Z-
dc.date.issued2024-07-01-
dc.identifier.citationThe American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2024, v. 119, n. 7, p. 1318-1325-
dc.identifier.issn0002-9270-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347184-
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION:Both artificial intelligence (AI) and distal attachment devices have been shown to improve adenoma detection rate and reduce miss rate during colonoscopy. We studied the combined effect of Endocuff and AI on enhancing detection rates of various colonic lesions.METHODS:This was a 3-Arm prospective randomized colonoscopy study involving patients aged 40 years or older. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to undergo Endocuff with AI, AI alone, or standard high-definition (HD) colonoscopy. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR) between the Endocuff-AI and AI groups while secondary outcomes included detection rates of polyp (PDR), sessile serrated lesion (sessile detection rate [SDR]), and advanced adenoma (advanced adenoma detection rate) between the 2 groups.RESULTS:A total of 682 patients were included (mean age 65.4 years, 52.3% male), with 53.7% undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy. The ADR for the Endocuff-AI, AI, and HD groups was 58.7%, 53.8%, and 46.3%, respectively, while the corresponding PDR was 77.0%, 74.0%, and 61.2%. A significant increase in ADR, PDR, and SDR was observed between the Endocuff-AI and AI groups (ADR difference: 4.9%, 95% CI: 1.4%-8.2%, P = 0.03; PDR difference: 3.0%, 95% CI: 0.4%-5.8%, P = 0.04; SDR difference: 6.4%, 95% CI: 3.4%-9.7%, P < 0.01). Both Endocuff-AI and AI groups had a higher ADR, PDR, SDR, and advanced adenoma detection rate than the HD group (all P < 0.01).DISCUSSION:Endocuff in combination with AI further improves various colonic lesion detection rates when compared with AI alone.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkins-
dc.relation.ispartofThe American Journal of Gastroenterology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectartificial intelligence-
dc.subjectcolonic adenoma.-
dc.subjectcolonic polyp-
dc.subjectcolonoscopy-
dc.subjectendocuff-
dc.titleEndocuff with or Without Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy in Detection of Colorectal Adenoma: A Randomized Colonoscopy Trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.14309/ajg.0000000000002684-
dc.identifier.pmid38305278-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85197985020-
dc.identifier.volume119-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.spage1318-
dc.identifier.epage1325-
dc.identifier.eissn1572-0241-
dc.identifier.issnl0002-9270-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats