File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Semi-automatic proximal humeral trabecular bone density assessment tool: technique application and clinical validation

TitleSemi-automatic proximal humeral trabecular bone density assessment tool: technique application and clinical validation
Authors
KeywordsBone mineral density
Humeral proximal
Phantom-less QCT
Issue Date9-Mar-2024
PublisherSpringer
Citation
Osteoporosis International, 2024, v. 35, n. 6, p. 1049-1059 How to Cite?
Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to apply a newly developed semi-automatic phantom-less QCT (PL-QCT) to measure proximal humerus trabecular bone density based on chest CT and verify its accuracy and precision. Methods: Subcutaneous fat of the shoulder joint and trapezius muscle were used as calibration references for PL-QCT BMD measurement. A self-developed algorithm based on a convolution map was utilized in PL-QCT for semi-automatic BMD measurements. CT values of ROIs used in PL-QCT measurements were directly used for phantom-based quantitative computed tomography (PB-QCT) BMD assessment. The study included 376 proximal humerus for comparison between PB-QCT and PL-QCT. Two sports medicine doctors measured the proximal humerus with PB-QCT and PL-QCT without knowing each other’s results. Among them, 100 proximal humerus were included in the inter-operative and intra-operative BMD measurements for evaluating the repeatability and reproducibility of PL-QCT and PB-QCT. Results: A total of 188 patients with 376 shoulders were involved in this study. The consistency analysis indicated that the average bias between proximal humerus BMDs measured by PB-QCT and PL-QCT was 1.0 mg/cc (agreement range – 9.4 to 11.4; P > 0.05, no significant difference). Regression analysis between PB-QCT and PL-QCT indicated a good correlation (R-square is 0.9723). Short-term repeatability and reproducibility of proximal humerus BMDs measured by PB-QCT (CV: 5.10% and 3.41%) were slightly better than those of PL-QCT (CV: 6.17% and 5.64%). Conclusions: We evaluated the bone quality of the proximal humeral using chest CT through the semi-automatic PL-QCT system for the first time. Comparison between it and PB-QCT indicated that it could be a reliable shoulder BMD assessment tool with acceptable accuracy and precision. Summary: This study developed and verify a semi-automatic PL-QCT for assessment of proximal humeral bone density based on CT to assist in the assessment of proximal humeral osteoporosis and development of individualized treatment plans for shoulders.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347275
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.111

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGuo, De Ming-
dc.contributor.authorWeng, Yuan Zhi-
dc.contributor.authorYu, Ze Hao-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Shi Huai-
dc.contributor.authorQu, Wen Rui-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Xiao Ning-
dc.contributor.authorQi, Huan-
dc.contributor.authorMa, Chi-
dc.contributor.authorTang, Xiong Feng-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Rui Yan-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Qinghe-
dc.contributor.authorXu, Hao-
dc.contributor.authorLu, Weijia William-
dc.contributor.authorQin, Yan Guo-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-20T00:31:08Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-20T00:31:08Z-
dc.date.issued2024-03-09-
dc.identifier.citationOsteoporosis International, 2024, v. 35, n. 6, p. 1049-1059-
dc.identifier.issn0937-941X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347275-
dc.description.abstract<p>Purpose: This study aimed to apply a newly developed semi-automatic phantom-less QCT (PL-QCT) to measure proximal humerus trabecular bone density based on chest CT and verify its accuracy and precision. Methods: Subcutaneous fat of the shoulder joint and trapezius muscle were used as calibration references for PL-QCT BMD measurement. A self-developed algorithm based on a convolution map was utilized in PL-QCT for semi-automatic BMD measurements. CT values of ROIs used in PL-QCT measurements were directly used for phantom-based quantitative computed tomography (PB-QCT) BMD assessment. The study included 376 proximal humerus for comparison between PB-QCT and PL-QCT. Two sports medicine doctors measured the proximal humerus with PB-QCT and PL-QCT without knowing each other’s results. Among them, 100 proximal humerus were included in the inter-operative and intra-operative BMD measurements for evaluating the repeatability and reproducibility of PL-QCT and PB-QCT. Results: A total of 188 patients with 376 shoulders were involved in this study. The consistency analysis indicated that the average bias between proximal humerus BMDs measured by PB-QCT and PL-QCT was 1.0 mg/cc (agreement range – 9.4 to 11.4; P > 0.05, no significant difference). Regression analysis between PB-QCT and PL-QCT indicated a good correlation (R-square is 0.9723). Short-term repeatability and reproducibility of proximal humerus BMDs measured by PB-QCT (CV: 5.10% and 3.41%) were slightly better than those of PL-QCT (CV: 6.17% and 5.64%). Conclusions: We evaluated the bone quality of the proximal humeral using chest CT through the semi-automatic PL-QCT system for the first time. Comparison between it and PB-QCT indicated that it could be a reliable shoulder BMD assessment tool with acceptable accuracy and precision. Summary: This study developed and verify a semi-automatic PL-QCT for assessment of proximal humeral bone density based on CT to assist in the assessment of proximal humeral osteoporosis and development of individualized treatment plans for shoulders.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.ispartofOsteoporosis International-
dc.subjectBone mineral density-
dc.subjectHumeral proximal-
dc.subjectPhantom-less QCT-
dc.titleSemi-automatic proximal humeral trabecular bone density assessment tool: technique application and clinical validation-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00198-024-07047-y-
dc.identifier.pmid38459138-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85186851112-
dc.identifier.volume35-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage1049-
dc.identifier.epage1059-
dc.identifier.eissn1433-2965-
dc.identifier.issnl0937-941X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats