File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Age Differences in Electronic Mental Health Literacy: Qualitative Study

TitleAge Differences in Electronic Mental Health Literacy: Qualitative Study
Authors
Keywordsage-related difference
eHealth literacy
electronic mental health literacy
eMHL
mental health
mental health literacy
Issue Date16-Jul-2024
PublisherJMIR Publications
Citation
Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2024, v. 26, n. 1 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background: Electronic mental health literacy (eMHL) is critical for accessing and effectively using digital mental health resources. However, there is a paucity of research on how eMHL varies across age groups. Objective: This study aimed to investigate differences in eMHL among young, middle-aged, and older adults; provide insights into the needs, behaviors, and attitudes of different age groups in relation to digital mental health resources; and ultimately, inform the improvement of mental health services. Methods: A qualitative investigation was conducted to examine the differences in eMHL across different age demographics in the Chinese population in 2023. The study sample comprised 3 distinct age groups: 18-34 years, 35-64 years, and 65 years and older. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling to ensure a diverse representation of the population. Data were collected through semistructured one-on-one interviews, which allowed for in-depth exploration of individual experiences and perceptions. The gathered data were subsequently subjected to rigorous thematic analysis to enable the identification and interpretation of recurring patterns and themes. Results: The principal outcomes derived from these interviews were synthesized into 5 distinct dimensions: emotional needs, use of digital mental health resources, assessment of digital mental health information, engagement with social media to regulate emotions, and coping strategies. These dimensions were uniformly observed across the 3 age groups. Conclusions: We identified differences in knowledge, skills, and attitudes regarding the use of web-based information for managing mental health problems between the 3 age groups. The findings highlight the importance of age-specific strategies for improving eMHL.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347525
ISSN
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.020

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorXu, Richard Huan-
dc.contributor.authorTian, Lidan-
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Liling-
dc.contributor.authorCao, Yuan-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Sherry Kit Wa-
dc.contributor.authorDong, Dong-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Wai Ling Annie-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Eliza Lai Yi-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T00:30:31Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-25T00:30:31Z-
dc.date.issued2024-07-16-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2024, v. 26, n. 1-
dc.identifier.issn1439-4456-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347525-
dc.description.abstract<p>Background: Electronic mental health literacy (eMHL) is critical for accessing and effectively using digital mental health resources. However, there is a paucity of research on how eMHL varies across age groups. Objective: This study aimed to investigate differences in eMHL among young, middle-aged, and older adults; provide insights into the needs, behaviors, and attitudes of different age groups in relation to digital mental health resources; and ultimately, inform the improvement of mental health services. Methods: A qualitative investigation was conducted to examine the differences in eMHL across different age demographics in the Chinese population in 2023. The study sample comprised 3 distinct age groups: 18-34 years, 35-64 years, and 65 years and older. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling to ensure a diverse representation of the population. Data were collected through semistructured one-on-one interviews, which allowed for in-depth exploration of individual experiences and perceptions. The gathered data were subsequently subjected to rigorous thematic analysis to enable the identification and interpretation of recurring patterns and themes. Results: The principal outcomes derived from these interviews were synthesized into 5 distinct dimensions: emotional needs, use of digital mental health resources, assessment of digital mental health information, engagement with social media to regulate emotions, and coping strategies. These dimensions were uniformly observed across the 3 age groups. Conclusions: We identified differences in knowledge, skills, and attitudes regarding the use of web-based information for managing mental health problems between the 3 age groups. The findings highlight the importance of age-specific strategies for improving eMHL.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherJMIR Publications-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Medical Internet Research-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectage-related difference-
dc.subjecteHealth literacy-
dc.subjectelectronic mental health literacy-
dc.subjecteMHL-
dc.subjectmental health-
dc.subjectmental health literacy-
dc.titleAge Differences in Electronic Mental Health Literacy: Qualitative Study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.2196/59131-
dc.identifier.pmid39012686-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85198955519-
dc.identifier.volume26-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.eissn1438-8871-
dc.identifier.issnl1438-8871-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats