File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.12809/HKJR2217393
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85128609149
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: First-line Therapy for Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer: a Network Meta-analysis
Title | First-line Therapy for Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer: a Network Meta-analysis |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Meta-analysis Prostatic neoplasms Therapeutics |
Issue Date | 1-Jan-2022 |
Publisher | Hong Kong Academy of Medicine Press |
Citation | Hong Kong Journal of Radiology, 2022, v. 25, n. 1, p. 6-15 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objective: The treatment landscape of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) has been transforming in the past decade. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone (AAP), apalutamide (APA), enzalutamide (ENZA), and docetaxel (Doce) added to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were shown to outperform ADT alone. However, data on direct comparison of the different regimens are sparse. We sought to review current evidence on first-line therapies in mCSPC and compare their results in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in a network meta-analysis. Methods: We performed a systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library databases in September 2020. ADT was the reference category. Treatments were grouped into four categories: Doce+ADT, AAP+ADT, APA+ADT, and ENZA+ADT. The primary endpoint of our study was OS. Results: We analysed eight trials with 7790 total patients, using frequentist network meta-analysis and P-score to rank the treatments. AAP+ADT showed the highest P-score of 86% with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.56-0.71) in OS while ENZA+ADT performed best in PFS (HR=0.40, 95% CI=0.34-0.46) with a P-score of 98%. Conclusion: We found that AAP+ADT treatment was most effective in prolonging OS. ENZA+ADT might provide better PFS in mCSPC. Analysis of OS and PFS provides guidance on selecting the best choice of first-line treatments. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/347675 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 0.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.127 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Zheng, KYC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fong, AKH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, SK | - |
dc.contributor.author | So, TH | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-27T00:30:17Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-27T00:30:17Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-01-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Hong Kong Journal of Radiology, 2022, v. 25, n. 1, p. 6-15 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2223-6619 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/347675 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>Objective: The treatment landscape of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) has been transforming in the past decade. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone (AAP), apalutamide (APA), enzalutamide (ENZA), and docetaxel (Doce) added to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were shown to outperform ADT alone. However, data on direct comparison of the different regimens are sparse. We sought to review current evidence on first-line therapies in mCSPC and compare their results in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in a network meta-analysis. Methods: We performed a systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library databases in September 2020. ADT was the reference category. Treatments were grouped into four categories: Doce+ADT, AAP+ADT, APA+ADT, and ENZA+ADT. The primary endpoint of our study was OS. Results: We analysed eight trials with 7790 total patients, using frequentist network meta-analysis and P-score to rank the treatments. AAP+ADT showed the highest P-score of 86% with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.56-0.71) in OS while ENZA+ADT performed best in PFS (HR=0.40, 95% CI=0.34-0.46) with a P-score of 98%. Conclusion: We found that AAP+ADT treatment was most effective in prolonging OS. ENZA+ADT might provide better PFS in mCSPC. Analysis of OS and PFS provides guidance on selecting the best choice of first-line treatments.</p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Hong Kong Academy of Medicine Press | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Hong Kong Journal of Radiology | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | Meta-analysis | - |
dc.subject | Prostatic neoplasms | - |
dc.subject | Therapeutics | - |
dc.title | First-line Therapy for Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer: a Network Meta-analysis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.12809/HKJR2217393 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85128609149 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 25 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 6 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 15 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2307-4620 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 2223-6619 | - |