File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: First-line Therapy for Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer: a Network Meta-analysis

TitleFirst-line Therapy for Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer: a Network Meta-analysis
Authors
KeywordsMeta-analysis
Prostatic neoplasms
Therapeutics
Issue Date1-Jan-2022
PublisherHong Kong Academy of Medicine Press
Citation
Hong Kong Journal of Radiology, 2022, v. 25, n. 1, p. 6-15 How to Cite?
Abstract

Objective: The treatment landscape of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) has been transforming in the past decade. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone (AAP), apalutamide (APA), enzalutamide (ENZA), and docetaxel (Doce) added to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were shown to outperform ADT alone. However, data on direct comparison of the different regimens are sparse. We sought to review current evidence on first-line therapies in mCSPC and compare their results in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in a network meta-analysis. Methods: We performed a systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library databases in September 2020. ADT was the reference category. Treatments were grouped into four categories: Doce+ADT, AAP+ADT, APA+ADT, and ENZA+ADT. The primary endpoint of our study was OS. Results: We analysed eight trials with 7790 total patients, using frequentist network meta-analysis and P-score to rank the treatments. AAP+ADT showed the highest P-score of 86% with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.56-0.71) in OS while ENZA+ADT performed best in PFS (HR=0.40, 95% CI=0.34-0.46) with a P-score of 98%. Conclusion: We found that AAP+ADT treatment was most effective in prolonging OS. ENZA+ADT might provide better PFS in mCSPC. Analysis of OS and PFS provides guidance on selecting the best choice of first-line treatments.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347675
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 0.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.127

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZheng, KYC-
dc.contributor.authorFong, AKH-
dc.contributor.authorChan, SK-
dc.contributor.authorSo, TH-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-27T00:30:17Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-27T00:30:17Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01-01-
dc.identifier.citationHong Kong Journal of Radiology, 2022, v. 25, n. 1, p. 6-15-
dc.identifier.issn2223-6619-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347675-
dc.description.abstract<p>Objective: The treatment landscape of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) has been transforming in the past decade. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone (AAP), apalutamide (APA), enzalutamide (ENZA), and docetaxel (Doce) added to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were shown to outperform ADT alone. However, data on direct comparison of the different regimens are sparse. We sought to review current evidence on first-line therapies in mCSPC and compare their results in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in a network meta-analysis. Methods: We performed a systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library databases in September 2020. ADT was the reference category. Treatments were grouped into four categories: Doce+ADT, AAP+ADT, APA+ADT, and ENZA+ADT. The primary endpoint of our study was OS. Results: We analysed eight trials with 7790 total patients, using frequentist network meta-analysis and P-score to rank the treatments. AAP+ADT showed the highest P-score of 86% with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.56-0.71) in OS while ENZA+ADT performed best in PFS (HR=0.40, 95% CI=0.34-0.46) with a P-score of 98%. Conclusion: We found that AAP+ADT treatment was most effective in prolonging OS. ENZA+ADT might provide better PFS in mCSPC. Analysis of OS and PFS provides guidance on selecting the best choice of first-line treatments.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherHong Kong Academy of Medicine Press-
dc.relation.ispartofHong Kong Journal of Radiology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectMeta-analysis-
dc.subjectProstatic neoplasms-
dc.subjectTherapeutics-
dc.titleFirst-line Therapy for Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer: a Network Meta-analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.12809/HKJR2217393-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85128609149-
dc.identifier.volume25-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage6-
dc.identifier.epage15-
dc.identifier.eissn2307-4620-
dc.identifier.issnl2223-6619-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats