File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Outdoor public recreation spaces and social connectedness among adolescents

TitleOutdoor public recreation spaces and social connectedness among adolescents
Authors
KeywordsBeaches
Neighbourhood
Parks
Paths
Physical activity
Social connectedness
Social interaction
Sports facilities
Streets
Youth
Issue Date24-Jan-2022
PublisherBioMed Central
Citation
BMC Public Health, 2022, v. 22, n. 1 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background: Outdoor public recreation spaces are important settings for leisure and physical activity. Adolescents’ use of these spaces may contribute to social connectedness via social interaction with peers and the community in these settings. However, research on this topic is limited. This exploratory study examined associations of frequency of visitation and physical activity in outdoor public recreation spaces with social connectedness among adolescents in Melbourne, Australia. Methods: Adolescents self-reported their frequency of visitation to parks, trails, beach/lake, and sports facilities; frequency of physical activity in a park, local street or path, and their street; and social connectedness. Separate analyses were conducted for visitation (n = 349, 15.4 ± 1.6 years, 58% female) and physical activity (n = 441, 15.4 ± 1.6 years, 59% female) using multilevel linear regression models. Results: No significant associations were observed for frequency of visitation to a park (B = 0.86, 95% CI = − 0.26, 1.99), trails (B = 0.41, 95% CI = − 0.61, 1.44), beach/lake (B = − 0.44, 95% CI = − 1.46, 0.57), or sports facilities (B = 0.64, 95% CI = − 0.43, 1.70), nor for frequency of physical activity in their street (B = − 0.07, 95% CI = − 0.46, 0.31), local street/path (B = − 0.05, 95% CI = − 0.43, 0.33) or in a park (B = 0.23, 95% CI = − 0.14, 0.60) with adolescents’ social connectedness. Conclusions: The findings did not support the hypothesis that visiting and being active in outdoor public recreation spaces are associated with adolescents’ social connectedness. Future research should consider the duration and context of outdoor public recreation space use (e.g., sports, socialising, relaxing alone) and whether different types and/or a combination of public spaces are more/less conducive to social connectedness.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347822
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.253

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRivera, Elise-
dc.contributor.authorVeitch, Jenny-
dc.contributor.authorLoh, Venurs HY-
dc.contributor.authorSalmon, Jo-
dc.contributor.authorCerin, Ester-
dc.contributor.authorMavoa, Suzanne-
dc.contributor.authorVillanueva, Karen-
dc.contributor.authorTimperio, Anna-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-01T00:30:31Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-01T00:30:31Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01-24-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Public Health, 2022, v. 22, n. 1-
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347822-
dc.description.abstract<p>Background: Outdoor public recreation spaces are important settings for leisure and physical activity. Adolescents’ use of these spaces may contribute to social connectedness via social interaction with peers and the community in these settings. However, research on this topic is limited. This exploratory study examined associations of frequency of visitation and physical activity in outdoor public recreation spaces with social connectedness among adolescents in Melbourne, Australia. Methods: Adolescents self-reported their frequency of visitation to parks, trails, beach/lake, and sports facilities; frequency of physical activity in a park, local street or path, and their street; and social connectedness. Separate analyses were conducted for visitation (n = 349, 15.4 ± 1.6 years, 58% female) and physical activity (n = 441, 15.4 ± 1.6 years, 59% female) using multilevel linear regression models. Results: No significant associations were observed for frequency of visitation to a park (B = 0.86, 95% CI = − 0.26, 1.99), trails (B = 0.41, 95% CI = − 0.61, 1.44), beach/lake (B = − 0.44, 95% CI = − 1.46, 0.57), or sports facilities (B = 0.64, 95% CI = − 0.43, 1.70), nor for frequency of physical activity in their street (B = − 0.07, 95% CI = − 0.46, 0.31), local street/path (B = − 0.05, 95% CI = − 0.43, 0.33) or in a park (B = 0.23, 95% CI = − 0.14, 0.60) with adolescents’ social connectedness. Conclusions: The findings did not support the hypothesis that visiting and being active in outdoor public recreation spaces are associated with adolescents’ social connectedness. Future research should consider the duration and context of outdoor public recreation space use (e.g., sports, socialising, relaxing alone) and whether different types and/or a combination of public spaces are more/less conducive to social connectedness.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Public Health-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectBeaches-
dc.subjectNeighbourhood-
dc.subjectParks-
dc.subjectPaths-
dc.subjectPhysical activity-
dc.subjectSocial connectedness-
dc.subjectSocial interaction-
dc.subjectSports facilities-
dc.subjectStreets-
dc.subjectYouth-
dc.titleOutdoor public recreation spaces and social connectedness among adolescents-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12889-022-12558-6-
dc.identifier.pmid35073899-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85123479948-
dc.identifier.volume22-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2458-
dc.identifier.issnl1471-2458-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats