File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparison between deep learning architectures for the 1 km, 10/15-min estimation of downward shortwave radiation from AHI and ABI

TitleComparison between deep learning architectures for the 1 km, 10/15-min estimation of downward shortwave radiation from AHI and ABI
Authors
KeywordsABI
AHI
CNN
Deep learning
DeNET
Geostationary
GRU
Shortwave radiation
Solar energy
Solar radiation
Issue Date1-Sep-2023
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Remote Sensing of Environment, 2023, v. 295 How to Cite?
AbstractThe retrieval of downward shortwave radiation (DSR) with high spatiotemporal resolution and short latency is critical. It is the fundamental driving force of surface energy, carbon, and hydrological circulations, and a key energy source for photovoltaic electricity. However, existing methods face significant challenges owing to cloud heterogeneity and their reliance on other satellite-derived products, which hinder the retrieval of accurate and timely DSR with high spatiotemporal resolution. In addition to the spectral features used in traditional approaches, deep learning (DL) can incorporate the spatial and temporal features of satellite data. This study developed and compared three DL methods, namely the DenseNet, the bidirectional gated recurrent unit without surface albedo as inputs (BiGRUnor), and the convolutional neural network with gated recurrent unit without surface albedo as inputs (CNNGRUnor). These methods were used to estimate DSR at 1 km and 10/15 min resolutions directly from top-of-atmosphere reflectance over the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI) onboard Himawari-8 and the Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) onboard GOES-16 coverage, achieving high accuracies. The instantaneous root mean square error (RMSE) and relative RMSE for the three models were 68.4 (16.1%), 69.4 (16.3%), and 67.1 (15.7%) W/m2, respectively, which are lower than the baseline machine learning method, the multilayer perceptron model (MLP), with RMSE at 76.8 W/m2 (18.0%). Hourly accuracies for the three DL methods were 58.6 (14.1%), 57.8 (14.0%), and 57.3 (13.8%) W/m2, which are within the DSR RMSEs that we estimated for existing datasets of the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) (88.8 W/m2, 21.4%) and GeoNEX (77.8 W/m2, 18.8%). The study illustrates that DL models that incorporate temporal information can eliminate the need for surface albedo as an input, which is crucial for timely monitoring and nowcasting of DSR. Incorporating spatial information can enhance retrieval accuracy in overcast conditions, and incorporating infrared bands can further improve the accuracy of DSR estimation.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347910
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 11.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 4.310

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, Ruohan-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Dongdong-
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Shunlin-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-03T00:30:25Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-03T00:30:25Z-
dc.date.issued2023-09-01-
dc.identifier.citationRemote Sensing of Environment, 2023, v. 295-
dc.identifier.issn0034-4257-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347910-
dc.description.abstractThe retrieval of downward shortwave radiation (DSR) with high spatiotemporal resolution and short latency is critical. It is the fundamental driving force of surface energy, carbon, and hydrological circulations, and a key energy source for photovoltaic electricity. However, existing methods face significant challenges owing to cloud heterogeneity and their reliance on other satellite-derived products, which hinder the retrieval of accurate and timely DSR with high spatiotemporal resolution. In addition to the spectral features used in traditional approaches, deep learning (DL) can incorporate the spatial and temporal features of satellite data. This study developed and compared three DL methods, namely the DenseNet, the bidirectional gated recurrent unit without surface albedo as inputs (BiGRUnor), and the convolutional neural network with gated recurrent unit without surface albedo as inputs (CNNGRUnor). These methods were used to estimate DSR at 1 km and 10/15 min resolutions directly from top-of-atmosphere reflectance over the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI) onboard Himawari-8 and the Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) onboard GOES-16 coverage, achieving high accuracies. The instantaneous root mean square error (RMSE) and relative RMSE for the three models were 68.4 (16.1%), 69.4 (16.3%), and 67.1 (15.7%) W/m2, respectively, which are lower than the baseline machine learning method, the multilayer perceptron model (MLP), with RMSE at 76.8 W/m2 (18.0%). Hourly accuracies for the three DL methods were 58.6 (14.1%), 57.8 (14.0%), and 57.3 (13.8%) W/m2, which are within the DSR RMSEs that we estimated for existing datasets of the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) (88.8 W/m2, 21.4%) and GeoNEX (77.8 W/m2, 18.8%). The study illustrates that DL models that incorporate temporal information can eliminate the need for surface albedo as an input, which is crucial for timely monitoring and nowcasting of DSR. Incorporating spatial information can enhance retrieval accuracy in overcast conditions, and incorporating infrared bands can further improve the accuracy of DSR estimation.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofRemote Sensing of Environment-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectABI-
dc.subjectAHI-
dc.subjectCNN-
dc.subjectDeep learning-
dc.subjectDeNET-
dc.subjectGeostationary-
dc.subjectGRU-
dc.subjectShortwave radiation-
dc.subjectSolar energy-
dc.subjectSolar radiation-
dc.titleComparison between deep learning architectures for the 1 km, 10/15-min estimation of downward shortwave radiation from AHI and ABI -
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rse.2023.113697-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85162813154-
dc.identifier.volume295-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-0704-
dc.identifier.issnl0034-4257-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats