File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033879
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85198036977
- PMID: 38934865
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Evaluating the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guideline—Recommended and Contemporary Pretest Probability Models in a Mixed Asian Cohort: The Contribution of Coronary Artery Calcium
Title | Evaluating the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guideline—Recommended and Contemporary Pretest Probability Models in a Mixed Asian Cohort: The Contribution of Coronary Artery Calcium |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | computed tomography angiography coronary artery calcium score coronary artery disease pretest probability risk factor |
Issue Date | 27-Jun-2024 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Citation | Journal of the American Heart Association Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, 2024, v. 13, n. 13 How to Cite? |
Abstract | BACKGROUND: Most pretest probability (PTP) tools for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) were Western-developed. The most appropriate PTP models and the contribution of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) in Asian populations remain unknown. In a mixed Asian cohort, we compare 5 PTP models: local assessment of the heart (LAH), CAD Consortium (CAD2), risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood, the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology and the European Society of Cardiology PTP and 3 extended versions of these models that incorporated CACS: LAH(CACS), CAD2(CACS), and the CACS-clinical likelihood. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study cohort included 771 patients referred for stable chest pain. Obstructive CAD prevalence was 27.5%. Calibration, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) and net reclassification index were evaluated. LAH clinical had the best calibration (χ2 5.8; P=0.12). For CACS models, LAH(CACS) showed least deviation between observed and expected cases (χ2 37.5; P<0.001). There was no difference in AUCs between the LAH clinical (AUC, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.69–0.77]), CAD2 clinical (AUC, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.68–0.76]), risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood (AUC, 0.73 [95% CI: 0.69–0.76) and European Society of Cardiology PTP (AUC, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.67–0.75]). CACS improved discrimination and reclassification of the LAH(CACS) (AUC, 0.88; net reclassification index, 0.46), CAD2(CACS) (AUC, 0.87; net reclassification index, 0.29) and CACS-CL (AUC, 0.87; net reclassification index, 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: In a mixed Asian cohort, Asian-derived LAH models had similar discriminatory performance but better calibration and risk categorization for clinically relevant PTP cutoffs. Incorporating CACS improved discrimination and reclassification. These results support the use of population-matched, CACS-inclusive PTP tools for the prediction of obstructive CAD. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/348559 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 5.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.126 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Baskaran, Lohendran | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yan, Linxuan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tan, Chun S | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, Woon W | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tan, Swee Y | - |
dc.contributor.author | Williams, Michelle C | - |
dc.contributor.author | Han, Donghee | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nakanishi, Rine | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cerci, Rodrigo J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ng, Ming Yen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shaw, Leslee J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chua, Terrance S J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Douglas, Pamela | - |
dc.contributor.author | Winther, Simon | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-10T00:31:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-10T00:31:34Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-06-27 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of the American Heart Association Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, 2024, v. 13, n. 13 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2047-9980 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/348559 | - |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Most pretest probability (PTP) tools for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) were Western-developed. The most appropriate PTP models and the contribution of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) in Asian populations remain unknown. In a mixed Asian cohort, we compare 5 PTP models: local assessment of the heart (LAH), CAD Consortium (CAD2), risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood, the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology and the European Society of Cardiology PTP and 3 extended versions of these models that incorporated CACS: LAH(CACS), CAD2(CACS), and the CACS-clinical likelihood. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study cohort included 771 patients referred for stable chest pain. Obstructive CAD prevalence was 27.5%. Calibration, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) and net reclassification index were evaluated. LAH clinical had the best calibration (χ2 5.8; P=0.12). For CACS models, LAH(CACS) showed least deviation between observed and expected cases (χ2 37.5; P<0.001). There was no difference in AUCs between the LAH clinical (AUC, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.69–0.77]), CAD2 clinical (AUC, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.68–0.76]), risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood (AUC, 0.73 [95% CI: 0.69–0.76) and European Society of Cardiology PTP (AUC, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.67–0.75]). CACS improved discrimination and reclassification of the LAH(CACS) (AUC, 0.88; net reclassification index, 0.46), CAD2(CACS) (AUC, 0.87; net reclassification index, 0.29) and CACS-CL (AUC, 0.87; net reclassification index, 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: In a mixed Asian cohort, Asian-derived LAH models had similar discriminatory performance but better calibration and risk categorization for clinically relevant PTP cutoffs. Incorporating CACS improved discrimination and reclassification. These results support the use of population-matched, CACS-inclusive PTP tools for the prediction of obstructive CAD. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Wiley | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of the American Heart Association Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | computed tomography angiography | - |
dc.subject | coronary artery calcium score | - |
dc.subject | coronary artery disease | - |
dc.subject | pretest probability | - |
dc.subject | risk factor | - |
dc.title | Evaluating the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guideline—Recommended and Contemporary Pretest Probability Models in a Mixed Asian Cohort: The Contribution of Coronary Artery Calcium | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1161/JAHA.123.033879 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 38934865 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85198036977 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 13 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 13 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2047-9980 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 2047-9980 | - |