File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Combined quantitative amyloid-β PET and structural MRI features improve Alzheimer's Disease classification in random forest model - A multicenter study

TitleCombined quantitative amyloid-β PET and structural MRI features improve Alzheimer's Disease classification in random forest model - A multicenter study
Authors
KeywordsAlzheimer's Disease
Centiloid scale
Multi-site
Random forest model
Regional Aβ deposition
Issue Date1-Jan-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Academic Radiology, 2024 How to Cite?
AbstractRationale and Objectives: Prior to clinical presentations of Alzheimer's Disease (AD), neuropathological changes, such as amyloid-β and brain atrophy, have accumulated at the earlier stages of the disease. The combination of such biomarkers assessed by multiple modalities commonly improves the likelihood of AD etiology. We aimed to explore the discriminative ability of Aβ PET features and whether combining Aβ PET and structural MRI features can improve the classification performance of the machine learning model in older healthy control (OHC) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from AD. Material and methods: We collected 94 AD patients, 82 MCI patients, and 85 OHC from three different cohorts. 17 global/regional Aβ features in Centiloid, 122 regional volume, and 68 regional cortical thickness were extracted as imaging features. Single or combined modality features were used to train the random forest model on the testing set. The top 10 features were sorted based on the Gini index in each binary classification. Results: The results showed that AUC scores were 0.81/0.86 and 0.69/0.68 using sMRI/Aβ PET features on the testing set in differentiating OHC and MCI from AD. The performance was improved while combining two-modality features with an AUC of 0.89 and an AUC of 0.71 in two classifications. Compared to sMRI features, particular Aβ PET features contributed more to differentiating AD from others. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated the discriminative ability of Aβ PET features in differentiating AD from OHC and MCI. A combination of Aβ PET and structural MRI features can improve the RF model performance.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/348562
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.062

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBao, Yi Wen-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Zuo Jun-
dc.contributor.authorShea, Yat Fung-
dc.contributor.authorChiu, Patrick Ka Chun-
dc.contributor.authorKwan, Joseph SK-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Felix Hon Wai-
dc.contributor.authorMak, Henry Ka Fung-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-10T00:31:36Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-10T00:31:36Z-
dc.date.issued2024-01-01-
dc.identifier.citationAcademic Radiology, 2024-
dc.identifier.issn1076-6332-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/348562-
dc.description.abstractRationale and Objectives: Prior to clinical presentations of Alzheimer's Disease (AD), neuropathological changes, such as amyloid-β and brain atrophy, have accumulated at the earlier stages of the disease. The combination of such biomarkers assessed by multiple modalities commonly improves the likelihood of AD etiology. We aimed to explore the discriminative ability of Aβ PET features and whether combining Aβ PET and structural MRI features can improve the classification performance of the machine learning model in older healthy control (OHC) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from AD. Material and methods: We collected 94 AD patients, 82 MCI patients, and 85 OHC from three different cohorts. 17 global/regional Aβ features in Centiloid, 122 regional volume, and 68 regional cortical thickness were extracted as imaging features. Single or combined modality features were used to train the random forest model on the testing set. The top 10 features were sorted based on the Gini index in each binary classification. Results: The results showed that AUC scores were 0.81/0.86 and 0.69/0.68 using sMRI/Aβ PET features on the testing set in differentiating OHC and MCI from AD. The performance was improved while combining two-modality features with an AUC of 0.89 and an AUC of 0.71 in two classifications. Compared to sMRI features, particular Aβ PET features contributed more to differentiating AD from others. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated the discriminative ability of Aβ PET features in differentiating AD from OHC and MCI. A combination of Aβ PET and structural MRI features can improve the RF model performance.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofAcademic Radiology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectAlzheimer's Disease-
dc.subjectCentiloid scale-
dc.subjectMulti-site-
dc.subjectRandom forest model-
dc.subjectRegional Aβ deposition-
dc.titleCombined quantitative amyloid-β PET and structural MRI features improve Alzheimer's Disease classification in random forest model - A multicenter study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.acra.2024.06.040-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85198330342-
dc.identifier.issnl1076-6332-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats