File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Limited impact of lifting universal masks on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in schools: The crucial role of outcome measurements

TitleLimited impact of lifting universal masks on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in schools: The crucial role of outcome measurements
Authors
KeywordsCOVID
masking
school transmission
Issue Date1-Jun-2024
PublisherOxford University Press
Citation
PNAS Nexus, 2024, v. 3, n. 6 How to Cite?
AbstractAmid the COVID-19 pandemic, education systems globally implemented protective measures, notably mandatory mask wearing. As the pandemic's dynamics changed, many municipalities lifted these mandates, warranting a critical examination of these policy changes' implications. This study examines the effects of lifting mask mandates on COVID-19 transmission within Massachusetts school districts. We first replicated previous research that utilized a difference-in-difference (DID) model for COVID-19 incidence. We then repeated the DID analysis by replacing the outcome measurement with the reproductive number (Rt), reflecting the transmissibility. Due to the data availability, the Rt we estimated only measures the within school transmission. We found a similar result in the replication using incidence with an average treatment effect on treated (ATT) of 39.1 (95% CI: 20.4 to 57.4) COVID-19 cases per 1,000 students associated with lifting masking mandates. However, when replacing the outcome measurement to Rt, our findings suggest that no significant association between lifting mask mandates and reduced Rt (ATT: 0.04, 95% CI: -0.09 to 0.18), except for the first 2 weeks postintervention. Moreover, we estimated Rt below 1 at 4 weeks before lifting mask mandates across all school types, suggesting nonsustainable transmission before the implementation. Our reanalysis suggested no evidence of lifting mask mandates in schools impacted the COVID-19 transmission in the long term. Our study highlights the importance of examining the transmissibility outcome when evaluating interventions against transmission.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/348672

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, Mingwei-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Bingyi-
dc.contributor.authorCowling, Benjamin J.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-11T00:31:24Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-11T00:31:24Z-
dc.date.issued2024-06-01-
dc.identifier.citationPNAS Nexus, 2024, v. 3, n. 6-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/348672-
dc.description.abstractAmid the COVID-19 pandemic, education systems globally implemented protective measures, notably mandatory mask wearing. As the pandemic's dynamics changed, many municipalities lifted these mandates, warranting a critical examination of these policy changes' implications. This study examines the effects of lifting mask mandates on COVID-19 transmission within Massachusetts school districts. We first replicated previous research that utilized a difference-in-difference (DID) model for COVID-19 incidence. We then repeated the DID analysis by replacing the outcome measurement with the reproductive number (Rt), reflecting the transmissibility. Due to the data availability, the Rt we estimated only measures the within school transmission. We found a similar result in the replication using incidence with an average treatment effect on treated (ATT) of 39.1 (95% CI: 20.4 to 57.4) COVID-19 cases per 1,000 students associated with lifting masking mandates. However, when replacing the outcome measurement to Rt, our findings suggest that no significant association between lifting mask mandates and reduced Rt (ATT: 0.04, 95% CI: -0.09 to 0.18), except for the first 2 weeks postintervention. Moreover, we estimated Rt below 1 at 4 weeks before lifting mask mandates across all school types, suggesting nonsustainable transmission before the implementation. Our reanalysis suggested no evidence of lifting mask mandates in schools impacted the COVID-19 transmission in the long term. Our study highlights the importance of examining the transmissibility outcome when evaluating interventions against transmission.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherOxford University Press-
dc.relation.ispartofPNAS Nexus-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectCOVID-
dc.subjectmasking-
dc.subjectschool transmission-
dc.titleLimited impact of lifting universal masks on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in schools: The crucial role of outcome measurements-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae212-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85196670147-
dc.identifier.volume3-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.eissn2752-6542-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats